Jackie our girl Condalisa

Hahahaha.... you think I "hang on every word" you say? Your narcissism is running amok again. You put up quite a front trying to hide your deep-seated inferiority complex. Everyone can see you are getting hammered word for word, point by point, in this thread. The fact that you can't rebut anything HFC says - word for word, or point by point - is pitifully clear. So you bitch and moan about his style while getting killed on substance. And you keep coming back for more! It appears that masochism goes hand in glove with your narcissistic personality disorder.

Your mindless babbling about trumpanzees and Trump wagons is deflection and delusion. You're still so clueless you think anyone who pushes back against libtard hysteria is a blind Trump supporter. The sheeple are on your side of the fence, not ours. You and your fellow libtard monsters like James Hodgkinson are your own worst enemies. The more you foam at the mouth, scream like banzees, smash windows and shoot Republicans, the more counties turn red. Originally Posted by lustylad

Your response sounds like something out of HFS's bunk. Typical lemming!
Funny you called Hodgkins a liberal. I though the "Bern" was a Socialist. then again deep down you know Hilary would have been a better choice so you are still slinging mud her way. Worry not, when trump steps down like Nixon she will not be the POTUS. We will then have to deal with pence. How come I know you will be in full support of his agenda.

As many have mentioned. The conservatives were the one's who suggested we use the 2nd amendment if the election did not come out the way we wanted it.
Weird that after all the people killed it took just one wounded congressman for you pussies to think we should be more civil.
As for me I have always thought we should be civil. But as I have said before, Dems have plenty of guns. They just have more decorum. You poke the bear enough,it is gonna eat you.

SCAT Boy: I just noticed this reply.

Because you get pissed at the fact that we refuse to let up on you, that we insist on continuing to hammer you. So, when you see our replies, you get so emotional, that your narcissism driven emotions drive both your actions and responses. This has a tendency to cause you to miss detail, including what else was said on this thread.

SCAT Boy: Funny you seem to hang on every word I say.

This coming from the same guy that "just noticed a reply". This is an indication that you have to hang onto our replies, responding to them instead of doing the wise thing that you should be doing... Bowing out of an argument you've thoroughly been defeated in.

No, none of us are hanging on to every word that you say. What we are doing is calling you out for every point that you make. As much as you want us to "let you type last", we hammer you each time you spew your BS.

SCAT Boy: And pretty much every time you run your mouth someone has to take up for you.

Correction, every time he says something to you, in the form of hammering you for substantive errors in your argument. This could involve errors in your argument or errors in your tactics. The only person here, that is running his mouth, is you. As you can see, every time you run your mouth, we jump in and stomp your little pee pee into the ground.

SCAT Boy: I would imagine anyone that thinks HFC has any eminence, (the king of queening) has a pretty low self esteem.

Actually, they are pointing things out to you that your narcissism is blinding you to. Your intellect is acknowledging that I have superiority over you in this argument, evident by your use of "eminence", and your attempt to argue against that. Anybody that points that out to you, that I have an upper hand relative to you in this argument, is simply presenting the obvious.

This has nothing to do with esteem on our part. In fact, your continuing to argue in an argument, where you are getting destroyed consistently by multiple people, speaks volumes to your low self-esteem. In fact, your actions here indicate that you are attempting to keep arguing, despite getting destroyed consistently, in order to "type last" as a substitute for winning.

This goes back to what I indicated earlier in this thread, you are attempting to give yourself this false sense of victory and accomplishment via your attempts to remain in a fight that you are losing. Your remaining, despite your continued defeat, is your way to make up for your low self-esteem.

SCAT Boy: So yes I would imagine him and a few such as yourself would feel inferior to me.

WRONG! Again, this is your narcissism speaking. Only someone with narcissism issues would feel that others would feel "inferior" to you. No, I don't feel that at all. Neither do those who are also hammering you here or elsewhere. It's virtually impossible to feel that way when we're destroying you in this debate, and with your demonstrating that you have been a loser in real life via the piss poor judgment that you are demonstrating here.

The same piss poor judgment that you're displaying on this thread, by continuously arguing a position that you have thoroughly been destroyed and, is what you demonstrate outside of this message board. This is why I strongly believe that you have a work history that you are not proud of, one that involves a wake of short stints and failed career attempts.

SCAT Boy: I bet it pisses you off when you see us guys that have the ability to make our own opinions, while you are tied to the spin of the day with all the other trumpanzees.

WRONG! Again, I argued against your side of the argument for 13, going up to 14 years. Your side of the argument, including you, has advanced the same talking points, many of the same arguments, that I have repeatedly dismantled. These are the same talking points that are spewed by the mainstream media talking heads as well as the mainstream media.

It's like you guys are simply parroting what you hear from the criminally liberal biased media instead of thinking about what it is that you are taking a position on. I will give you an example, climate change and the so-called 97% agreement:

The media perpetrates this myth, that there is a 97% agreement among climate scientists that the planet is "warming up" and that people are "behind it". Your side of the argument eats that up and argues that on these threads.

What does my side of the argument do?

Well, I'm glad you asked. I downloaded the paper, the study, that came to the conclusion that there was a "97% agreement" among climate scientists. This is the same "study" that the medi references when they push the "consensus" BS.

What did I discover? It was based on a keyword search designed to stack the deck/results with papers favoring anthropomorphic global warming.

Despite using these keywords, designed to skew the results toward man-made global warming, approximately 67% of the papers that they pulled up did not take a position one way or another. This is based on over 11,000 papers. Out of the remaining 33%, approximately 32% expressed a position, and approximately 1% was inconclusive.

I discovered that the 97% figure was based on that 32%. I also saw, in that same paper, the acknowledgment that these papers that they downloaded represented a fraction of the total literature. So, I use this thing called the brain, something that your side of the argument refused to use to come to the following conclusion:

This 97% of the 32% of the total abstracts reviewed didn't constitute a consensus. Common sense also dictated that had they used a more neutral keyword search such as "climate change", the percentage of papers not expressing a position for or against man-made global warming would have even been larger.

THAT is how you come up with your own position, not like what your side of the argument does, blindly follows what you are told. The fact that I would argue this position, while your side would argue that 97% canard, speaks volumes as to which side of the argument uses their own brain, and which side of the argument blindly follows propaganda.

SCAT Boy: Just pray that when the Trump wagon rolls out of DC on fire,

This statement is further proof that you people don't get it. You people made assumptions, and blew hot air out of the pie holes on your faces, then acted like children when what you didn't expect to happen ended up happening. Trump winning the White House. Like the liberal talking heads that force-feed you your talking points, if you keep underestimating him, and keep spewing BS about him, you guys risk waking up in the aftermath of the next presidential elections agitated that Trump got another term.

SCAT Boy: that we do not seek exile for you lemmings.

The only lemmings that I see, on this message board and elsewhere, are those that argue the false canard of the "97% agreement among scientists" regarding global warming, as well as argue the other BS regressive arguments. That is not the only thing that you lemmings argue. Nearly every position that you guys have taken, that I have hammered you will, involve you guys arguing the same talking points spewed by liberal talking heads.

When it comes to the people that I argue with, it is like you guys pass the same script book, with the same talking points, to each other. It's as if this happens in the background when I find a new regressive to hammer: "Hey, I argued against herfacechair before, here is my 'cheat sheet', argue these points." But, unfortunately for your side of the argument, you guys' arguments meet a similar fate to the lemmings in the story involving them jumping to their fate.

SCAT Boy: I do understand at this point you are all in so keep on running your pie hole. (PROJECTING OWN TRAIT ONTO THE OPPOSITION)

What I told you before:

"You've been reduced to being a liberal windbag, blowing empty air out as if you were a vehicle with wheels rapidly spinning, but with the vehicle going nowhere." -- herfacechair

This trend still stands. Again, you've abandoned not only your original argument, but the series of sidetracking arguments, that you engaged in on this thread. I destroyed you in every attempt, and defeated every tactic that you used on this thread. You've been transitioning from a meltdown to simply fading away.

Your latest replies are becoming more unorganized, and show a thought process that is going in multiple directions, with no specific unified goal. You are simply in disarray. That is a sign that someone, in this case, you, have more than thoroughly been defeated. Your actions show that you are too slow to see this, thus you are taking actions that are embarrassing you... Actions that are actually damaging your credibility beyond what I have done to your arguments.

SCAT Boy: I am amused that you see HFC as a wordsmith.

No you aren't, your narcissism is agitated over the fact that others are pointing out to you what your intellect is also trying to point out to you. If you look beyond your attempts to downplay my responses, one can discover that subconsciously, you are in agreement.

SCAT Boy: I bet your hero is Jubal Sackett. LOL!

Jubal Sackett is a representation of one of the concepts that makes America great. The story involving him has him going on an adventurer that pushes out west instead of remaining in the comforts of the familiar. In his adventures, he prevails over challenges that both nature and humans can throw his way.

This is like how I prevail over your attempts to baffle me with BS, and your attempts to utilize other antics designed to get me to stop hammering you. This is pissing you off, as we can see with your replies. But, the fact that you'd mention Jubal Sackett is an indication that subconsciously, you know that what you thought was just a lizard turned out to be an unstoppable Godzilla that refuses to let you "type last".

SCAT Boy: Dam! you responded to me

This shouldn't come as a surprise to you, given that I've consistently responded to you. Remember the speech that I gave you regarding the "X" causing "Y" thing. Remember, if "X", then "Y", you provide X, I provide Y. So you should know by now that if you respond (X), I'll respond (Y).

SCAT Boy: talking about how you go on and on and not really saying anything

False. I "go on" regarding dismantling your posts, yes, but I go on with sentences, and paragraphs, that are jam packed with information that your ego shields are preventing you from seeing. The only person there, that's not really saying anything, is you. Look at your posts, they've increasingly shown that you can't keep your thoughts organized, and you can't even argue with an argument aimed at accomplishing an objective.

In fact, within the same sentence, you went in multiple directions, failed to show a common thought or objective, and showed us that you were "taking a stab" and pulling random thoughts out just to have something to say in response. This is a strategy that someone, getting his/her ass handed to him, would use in response to continuously getting proven wrong.

SCAT Boy: with a record breaking rant

First, that wasn't a rant, but a fact based, reasoned argument that destroyed your drivel and tripe. Second, that wasn't a record breaking post, I generated a longer post in a previous series of replies to you here. What I do see, regarding "breaking" is you, as you are demonstrating to us that you're reaching another one of your breaking points as you march towards total disintegration on this thread.

SCAT Boy: that was not even to a post addressed to you.

You may not have directed that post AT me, but you took swipes at me just the same. This required me to hammer that post, addressed to someone else, just as I would've done had you addressed me. You advanced "X" in the form of taking swipes at me. Guess what had to happen next? You guessed it, "Y", my holding you accountable for your stupidity.

You see, I saw what you were doing. You attempted to get me to stop hammering you, in that one aspect, by responding to someone else. You figured, erroneously, that I'd ignore that post thus "letting you type last". Instead, I saw it for what it was, you taking swipes at me while attempting to escape a response.

SCAT Boy: And all the while confirming what I said about you.

Wrong, I didn't confirm anything that you said about me, unless you said something related to my kicking your ass in this debate, or related to what makes it possible for me to kick your ass in debate. Now, if you were to say that I have every intention to deny you the opportunity to "type last", then I'd confirm that each time you try to "type last".

SCAT Boy: That you filibuster everything in your path.

If you paid attention to what's going on in this thread, you'd notice that my replies to those, that I'm not arguing with, are shorter, a lot shorter, than my replies to you. This alone proves you wrong. Also, what you describe as "filibuster" is my thoroughly dismantling your arguments each time you jump on here.

SCAT Boy: You once you said you did use speech to text.

I said this to you multiple times, yet you insist that I've been writing these posts. But yes, I do use speech to text in order to quickly dismantle your BS.

SCAT Boy: I may have to concede that you are a good little butt licker.

First, for you, that should be "ass kicker", as in I'm very good at kicking your ass in debate. You can't even call this a "squaring off", as this is a one-sided event involving my carpet bombing you and you retreating constantly.

Second, DATO has nothing to do with our debate, but the fact that you'd randomly throw this in proves my point that your thoughts are all over the place while you respond to me. This is understandable given the fact that you're getting more emotional. This increase in emotion is driving your actions, and clouding your ability to generate an organized post.

SCAT Boy: Do you have the girls sit on your face while you concoct these masterpieces of Narcissistic fodder?

First, the narcissistic fodder, that you're seeing in my replies, are YOUR statements that I'm dismantling. Yup, I fucked you up so hard in this debate that you're starting to fail to recognize your own narcissistic comments.

Second, no, I don't need to "concoct" anything, as the information that I use to dismantle your arguments is always with me, and is expandable with further studying/research. You're the one that has to "concoct" things to say, as you don't have the facts on your side. Your replies here indicate that you're concocting things just to pull crap out of your butt.

Third, don't mistake your strategy, to obtain further arguments, as something similar to what the rest of us do. We don't. You may get turned on by the idea of being a toilet slave to get your arguments, the rest of us would rather come to our own conclusions based on the analysis of the information that we get.

SCAT Boy: Your post proved every point I made.

Wrong. My post dismantled every point that you made, proving your arguments wrong. You, on the other hand, prove my points about your profile correct. You've disintegrated to copycatting me as an increasing part of your strategy. I didn't prove every point that you made about me, instead, my actions proved every point that you made about me wrong. I've thoroughly proven you wrong, but your narcissism drives you on.

SCAT Boy: You basically ordain yourself at every turn.

Don't mistake my accurately pointing out my experience and fact advantage over you as "self-ordaining". That's simply my spelling something out for you that you're too arrogant to see on your own... the fact that when it comes to this argument, I have an advantage over you in the logic and reason argument. I also destroy your arguments at every turn.

SCAT Boy: I am amused.

No you're not. The only person, in this exchange between us, that's amused is me. I take sadistic pleasure with destroying you guys in debate. You're reacting the way I expect you to react given the words, sentences, and paragraphs that I use to destroy your arguments.

In reality, you're getting more agitated when I continue to keep coming back to destroy you in debate. With each reply, I deny you your false sense of victory, sense of control, and your desire to have your BS left unchallenged.

I get a kick out of your reaction, your responses make me laugh. Causing you to respond the way you do here is like causing a dog to chase after its own tail.

SCAT Boy: I have met some pretty arrogant folks in my day

You need to be honest with the readers and acknowledge which person, between the two of us, is arrogant. It's not me, it's you, this is given my constantly describing you as narcissistic. The fact that I've destroyed you thoroughly in this debate is pretty clear to others. So is the fact that you insist in arguing a losing argument.

You're showing that you acknowledge this on a subconscious level, but your narcissism is driving you to keep coming back to get destroyed again. Your narcissism prevents you from seriously acknowledging your defeat, so you keep coming back to keep arguing an argument that you've lost, an argument where you're getting thoroughly dismantled in.

Your actions prove that you're the arrogant person between the two of us, not me.

SCAT Boy: but you are by far the most delusional.

Said without an ounce of proof. But again, you won't find that proof because my arguments are fact based, logical, and reasoned arguments. You, on the other hand, demonstrate delusion in your own replies. One of the many reasons to why I'm dismantling your arguments, and proving you wrong point by point, is because you're delusional.

You're also delusional if you think that any of your antics could prevent me from dismantling your replies. You'd also be delusional if you think that I'm just going to let your BS stand unchallenged. Meaning, if you think that I'm going to let you "type last", you're delusional. But again, a look at your posts is all that's needed to tell the audience that you're delusional, without my having to spell that out.

SCAT Boy: You remember in the movie K-pax when the guy said he could time travel. It makes me think of you.

That's a red herring comparison, there's no relationship between that character's actions, and my actions on this thread. I've thoroughly proven you wrong on this thread. You've consistently failed to prove me wrong, or to prove that my fact based, reasoned, logical arguments are something other than fact based, reasoned, logical arguments.

It's YOU that's comparable to the K-pax character that claims to be able to time travel. You do realize that this is one of the reasons to why I brought up the fixed post of you swinging your upper body back and forth in the day room, do you? I mean, my mention of that one brain celled activity in your head, that toy monkey in your head playing cymbals, or any other similar commentary, is to point out how retarded your arguments are.

SCAT Boy: Your response sounds like something out of HFS's bunk.

When two different people are looking at the same set of facts, they're going to come to the very same, or similar, conclusions. What he pointed out, he witnessed, observed, and analyzed, on his own. You're getting your ass handed to you, you're getting thoroughly debunked in a way that leaves you unable to effectively defend your position. Yet, you come back because you're driven by narcissism to do so.

That's a far cry from you liberals following the cues that your liberal talking head opinion masters provide you. You people argue using the same talking points I've seen in the liberal media, it's like you guys are zombies, with no brains, relaying arguments. But again, your MT cranial cavity has nothing but a toy monkey banging its cymbals inside.

I see that your SCAT mistress is using you more frequently now than before, for a part of this week, you came here infrequently... You need to show up and be in position on time for her to poop in your mouth and all over your face so that you could have arguments to present.

SCAT Boy: Typical lemming!

Not applicable to the conservatives on this forum. We independently came to our own conclusions based on the obvious facts, facts that you people keep ignoring. I've argued against your talking points when others like you advanced them over the past few years. These are the same talking points spewed by liberal talking heads and the criminally liberal media. They spew propaganda, you people mindlessly repeat that propaganda like brainless drones... Then meet a blistering fact checking scrutiny repeatedly. You, and those on your side of the argument, are the lemmings.

SCAT Boy: Funny you called Hodgkins a liberal. I though the "Bern" was a Socialist.

Both are liberals, yes, socialism is one of the objectives of today's liberals/regressives. So this shouldn't come as a surprise to you, and no, he's not contradicting himself.

SCAT Boy: then again deep down you know Hilary would have been a better choice so you are still slinging mud her way.

Wrong. Hilary was the worst choice, by a longshot. No, neither he, nor any other person capable of critical thought, would think that Hilary would've been a better choice. She proved, through her actions as Secretary of State, that she wasn't qualified for the office of the presidency.

Like Hussein O'Shitstain, she had no clue about how the economy worked, let alone how to get it going. She'd definitely be incompetent as a commander in chief. I'm sorry, but you don't leave people behind. She did that by failing the diplomatic team in Libya when she had the opportunity to mitigate the danger they actually experienced.

I could go on, and on, about why Spillage Shrillery, or Bolshevik Bernie, were poor choices for president.

SCAT Boy: Worry not,

No, there's nothing to worry about. You don't have a clue about what you're talking about, and your liberal opinion task masters don't have a clue about what they're talking about. You're just spitting poo out of your mouth as if you were a poo machine gun, spraying all that poo that your scat mistress fed you today.

SCAT Boy: when trump steps down like Nixon she will not be the POTUS.

Like the liberal media did during the run up to the election, like what the liberal media did during the run up to the Sessions testimony, you underestimate Trump and ignore the variables in play that'll prove you wrong. Trump is playing you guys like a fiddle, knowing full well that the media would eat up any BS story that puts Trump in a bad light.

Considering that you have your MT cranial cavity up your butt, you're not going to see how Trump is deliberately eroding the media's credibility in a way that the media is doing all the work.

SCAT Boy: We will then have to deal with pence. How come I know you will be in full support of his agenda.

For the same reason we'd know you would've supported Bolshevik Bernie or Spillage Shrillery's agendas... Conservatives generally support conservative policies, Regressives generally support regressive policies.

SCAT Boy: As many have mentioned.

Many have mentioned the flaws in your argument on this message board, but you disregard them. Why should we seriously take what many on your side has mentioned? Beyond the fact that your side of the argument doesn't know what it's talking about?

SCAT Boy: The conservatives were the one's who suggested we use the 2nd amendment if the election did not come out the way we wanted it.

We? Are you admitting to being a conservative?

Yes, there were those on the extreme who were talking about using the 2nd Amendment... Provided that nonlegal activity was involved to support election theft. If you paid attention to history, you'll learn of an instance where citizens had to take up arms, literally, in the face of election theft. I read about this incident in the VFW magazine, but you'd be able to access this information online.

The rest of us conservatives weren't advocating armed violence if the election didn't go our way. Had there been evidence of fraud, we would've taken a legal approach to dealing with it.

The real violence perpetrators are those who weren't satisfied with the results of the 2016 Presidential election. Many Regressives showed their true colors, and proved that the parties didn't switch. The Democratic Party has always been the party of thugs that wants to silence opposition. Today's Regresives don't need to put hoods and robes on to do their deeds.

SCAT Boy: Weird that after all the people killed it took just one wounded congressman for you pussies to think we should be more civil. (STRAWMAN)

We've demanded that you people demonstrate civility back when Bush was president. When a bunch of Regressives decided to re-enact Planet of the Apes, we demanded that you people act civil.

Yes, we've been accurately pointing out the fact that when it comes to freedom of speech, you guys don't include those that disagree with you. When it comes to compromise, you guys want us to abandon our side in favor of fully embracing yours. Compromise to you guys means that we completely concede to you guys and do things your way.

This call to be civil has been consistent. You people want to pull tantrums when things don't go your way. So now, when a Regressive decides to shoot an elected representative, we're going to continue to call for civility, and start hinting at options in case that madness doesn't stop.

SCAT Boy: As for me I have always thought we should be civil.

Part of civility involves bowing out of an argument you've been crushed in. What you're doing, remaining engaged in a debate you've thoroughly been destroyed in, is uncivil. When you add insults and attacks, like what you did to me when I previously didn't address you, it becomes an act of incivility.

What you're doing, on this thread, is equivalent to someone engaging in a terrible tantrum. Just read your reactions to my replying to your latest posts. That's not "civil".

SCAT Boy: But as I have said before, Dems have plenty of guns.

Yes, that was proven with the recent shooting that sent a Republican to the hospital, shooting done by a deranged Regressive. That was proven with other shootings that took place across the country.

SCAT Boy: They just have more decorum.

False. Look at the Regressives on this thread, including you. I don't see decorum coming from any of you guys. No, you guys don't show more decorum, you guys show little to no decorum. You guys are a bunch of crybabies that pull terrible two tantrums when you people don't get your way.

SCAT Boy: You poke the bear enough,it is gonna eat you.

What? Is there an echo here? That's what lustylad told you, you dimwit!

SCAT Boy: Your response sounds like something out of HFS's bunk.

When two different people are looking at the same set of facts, they're going to come to the very same, or similar, conclusions. What he pointed out, he witnessed, observed, and analyzed, on his own. You're getting your ass handed to you, you're getting thoroughly debunked in a way that leaves you unable to effectively defend your position. Yet, you come back because you're driven by narcissism to do so.

That's a far cry from you liberals following the cues that your liberal talking head opinion masters provide you. You people argue using the same talking points I've seen in the liberal media, it's like you guys are zombies, with no brains, relaying arguments. But again, your MT cranial cavity has nothing but a toy monkey banging its cymbals inside.

I see that your SCAT mistress is using you more frequently now than before, for a part of this week, you came here infrequently... You need to show up and be in position on time for her to poop in your mouth and all over your face so that you could have arguments to present.

SCAT Boy: Typical lemming!

Not applicable to the conservatives on this forum. We independently came to our own conclusions based on the obvious facts, facts that you people keep ignoring. I've argued against your talking points when others like you advanced them over the past few years. These are the same talking points spewed by liberal talking heads and the criminally liberal media. They spew propaganda, you people mindlessly repeat that propaganda like brainless drones... Then meet a blistering fact checking scrutiny repeatedly. You, and those on your side of the argument, are the lemmings.

SCAT Boy: Funny you called Hodgkins a liberal. I though the "Bern" was a Socialist.

Both are liberals, yes, socialism is one of the objectives of today's liberals/regressives. So this shouldn't come as a surprise to you, and no, he's not contradicting himself.

SCAT Boy: then again deep down you know Hilary would have been a better choice so you are still slinging mud her way.

Wrong. Hilary was the worst choice, by a longshot. No, neither he, nor any other person capable of critical thought, would think that Hilary would've been a better choice. She proved, through her actions as Secretary of State, that she wasn't qualified for the office of the presidency.

Like Hussein O'Shitstain, she had no clue about how the economy worked, let alone how to get it going. She'd definitely be incompetent as a commander in chief. I'm sorry, but you don't leave people behind. She did that by failing the diplomatic team in Libya when she had the opportunity to mitigate the danger they actually experienced.

I could go on, and on, about why Spillage Shrillery, or Bolshevik Bernie, were poor choices for president.

SCAT Boy: Worry not,

No, there's nothing to worry about. You don't have a clue about what you're talking about, and your liberal opinion task masters don't have a clue about what they're talking about. You're just spitting poo out of your mouth as if you were a poo machine gun, spraying all that poo that your scat mistress fed you today.

SCAT Boy: when trump steps down like Nixon she will not be the POTUS.

Like the liberal media did during the run up to the election, like what the liberal media did during the run up to the Sessions testimony, you underestimate Trump and ignore the variables in play that'll prove you wrong. Trump is playing you guys like a fiddle, knowing full well that the media would eat up any BS story that puts Trump in a bad light.

Considering that you have your MT cranial cavity up your butt, you're not going to see how Trump is deliberately eroding the media's credibility in a way that the media is doing all the work.

SCAT Boy: We will then have to deal with pence. How come I know you will be in full support of his agenda.

For the same reason we'd know you would've supported Bolshevik Bernie or Spillage Shrillery's agendas... Conservatives generally support conservative policies, Regressives generally support regressive policies.

SCAT Boy: As many have mentioned.

Many have mentioned the flaws in your argument on this message board, but you disregard them. Why should we seriously take what many on your side has mentioned? Beyond the fact that your side of the argument doesn't know what it's talking about?

SCAT Boy: The conservatives were the one's who suggested we use the 2nd amendment if the election did not come out the way we wanted it.

We? Are you admitting to being a conservative?

Yes, there were those on the extreme who were talking about using the 2nd Amendment... Provided that nonlegal activity was involved to support election theft. If you paid attention to history, you'll learn of an instance where citizens had to take up arms, literally, in the face of election theft. I read about this incident in the VFW magazine, but you'd be able to access this information online.

The rest of us conservatives weren't advocating armed violence if the election didn't go our way. Had there been evidence of fraud, we would've taken a legal approach to dealing with it.

The real violence perpetrators are those who weren't satisfied with the results of the 2016 Presidential election. Many Regressives showed their true colors, and proved that the parties didn't switch. The Democratic Party has always been the party of thugs that wants to silence opposition. Today's Regresives don't need to put hoods and robes on to do their deeds.

SCAT Boy: Weird that after all the people killed it took just one wounded congressman for you pussies to think we should be more civil. (STRAWMAN)

We've demanded that you people demonstrate civility back when Bush was president. When a bunch of Regressives decided to re-enact Planet of the Apes, we demanded that you people act civil.

Yes, we've been accurately pointing out the fact that when it comes to freedom of speech, you guys don't include those that disagree with you. When it comes to compromise, you guys want us to abandon our side in favor of fully embracing yours. Compromise to you guys means that we completely concede to you guys and do things your way.

This call to be civil has been consistent. You people want to pull tantrums when things don't go your way. So now, when a Regressive decides to shoot an elected representative, we're going to continue to call for civility, and start hinting at options in case that madness doesn't stop.

SCAT Boy: As for me I have always thought we should be civil.

Part of civility involves bowing out of an argument you've been crushed in. What you're doing, remaining engaged in a debate you've thoroughly been destroyed in, is uncivil. When you add insults and attacks, like what you did to me when I previously didn't address you, it becomes an act of incivility.

What you're doing, on this thread, is equivalent to someone engaging in a terrible tantrum. Just read your reactions to my replying to your latest posts. That's not "civil".

SCAT Boy: But as I have said before, Dems have plenty of guns.

Yes, that was proven with the recent shooting that sent a Republican to the hospital, shooting done by a deranged Regressive. That was proven with other shootings that took place across the country.

SCAT Boy: They just have more decorum.

False. Look at the Regressives on this thread, including you. I don't see decorum coming from any of you guys. No, you guys don't show more decorum, you guys show little to no decorum. You guys are a bunch of crybabies that pull terrible two tantrums when you people don't get your way.

SCAT Boy: You poke the bear enough,it is gonna eat you.

What? Is there an echo here? That's what lustylad told you, you dimwit! Originally Posted by herfacechair

Why is it some of you become others mouth pieces? Can he not answer for himself? Just send him a PM and he can copy and paste it. Seems like that is how he gets most of his replies anyway. Nobody gives a shit what you have to say. It is just the same garbage with a few words changed over and over again. Shut up and let the adults handle it. Be good or your mommy is gonna smother you again. Reading through all the BS you posted is saddening. I think you believe all the fabrications you come up with. Wouldn't it be great if everyone was like you and did all those sick things you talk about? It would make you feel less obscene I bet. When you and lusty get back from your honeymoon tell him to reply if he likes. You better hang on to him I know Gey Rey has a thing for him too!

Why is it some of you become others (sic) mouth pieces? Can he not answer for himself?

I'm lustylad, and I approved HFC's message.

Just send him a PM and he can copy and paste it. Seems like that is how he gets most of his replies anyway.

That wouldn't work. HFC is better at carpet-bombing. I'm a sniper. I make every bullet count.

Nobody gives a shit what you have to say.

You obviously do. That's why you keep coming back for more.

It is just the same garbage with a few words changed over and over again.

In other words, you want him to keep kicking your ass but try to mix it up more? Got it!

Shut up and let the adults handle it.

Judging from your posts, you're either 14 or a 14-year-old adolescent trapped inside an "adult" body.

Be good or your mommy is gonna smother you again.

Hmmm... is that how she controlled you? Is that why you practice auto-erotic self-asphyxiation?

Reading through all the BS you posted is saddening.

Yet you can't stop reading it all. That's not sad?

I think you believe all the fabrications you come up with.

Fabrications? You mean lies? Be specific, pockface. You said HFC's posts are 17 times as prolific as yours. But you have yet to point out a single, specific fabrication.

Wouldn't it be great if everyone was like you and did all those sick things you talk about? It would make you feel less obscene I bet.

Admit it... you're dying for a gorgeous woman to smother you with her pot of gold. It torments you knowing it'll never happen no matter how much you beg.

When you and lusty get back from your honeymoon tell him to reply if he likes.

I just replied.

You better hang on to him I know Gey Rey has a thing for him too!

If that's supposed to be some kind of homo trash talk, you have zero game. On a hooker board or in real life. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Better clean up your trailer trash this weekend, pockface. Your Dungan Street neighbors are complaining again.
.

Better clean up your trailer trash this weekend, pockface. Your Dungan Street neighbors are complaining again.
. Originally Posted by lustylad

Are they upset over all of the used condoms left throw all over his yard AGAIN ? ! The neighbors should have figured that out one MT Fluffer hoisted the rainbow flag in his yard !

Is this held at the HEB?

probably.

given the way the fluffers fluffing fluff about.

Originally Posted by MT Pockets View Post
Why is it some of you become others (sic) mouth pieces? Can he not answer for himself?

I'm lustylad, and I approved HFC's message.

Thats a good boy! Obey the Zen of Ostentation
Just send him a PM and he can copy and paste it. Seems like that is how he gets most of his replies anyway.

That wouldn't work. HFC is better at carpet-bombing. I'm a sniper. I make every bullet count.
Well I agree he is a carpet bomber. Just about as good as his hero Trump. Since you guys like to play Army. How's about I lay down and you blow the hell out of me!
Nobody gives a shit what you have to say.

You obviously do. That's why you keep coming back for more.

I guess the same can be said about me. Seems like a few have to comment on every post I make. I guess I have a fan club!
It is just the same garbage with a few words changed over and over again.

In other words, you want him to keep kicking your ass but try to mix it up more? Got it!
More like licking my ass. You know that is what he likes to do. Dont you?
Shut up and let the adults handle it.

Judging from your posts, you're either 14 or a 14-year-old adolescent trapped inside an "adult" body.
So now you are gonna try your hand at the psychobabble? You have a good mentor.
Be good or your mommy is gonna smother you again.

Hmmm... is that how she controlled you? Is that why you practice auto-erotic self-asphyxiation?

I think you meant to address your lover HFC with that question. Unless all his fabrications are lies as you mention below.
Reading through all the BS you posted is saddening.

Yet you can't stop reading it all. That's not sad?

I just skim through some. They just go on and on about how great he is.
I think you believe all the fabrications you come up with.

Fabrications? You mean lies? Be specific, pockface. You said HFC's posts are 17 times as prolific as yours. But you have yet to point out a single, specific fabrication.

You may be right. I was being polite when I said fabrications . But honestly I agree, those fables he tells are just that, Lies. Thanks for supporting my view.
Wouldn't it be great if everyone was like you and did all those sick things you talk about? It would make you feel less obscene I bet.

Admit it... you're dying for a gorgeous woman to smother you with her pot of gold. It torments you knowing it'll never happen no matter how much you beg.
So let me get this straight. HFC say's that I do it and then you say he is right, then you say he is lying and now you say that I am envious? Are you envious?
When you and lusty get back from your honeymoon tell him to reply if he likes.

I just replied.

LOL! How was the honeymoon? I assume not that good if you are hooking up with HFC already.
You better hang on to him I know Gey Rey has a thing for him too!

If that's supposed to be some kind of homo trash talk, you have zero game. On a hooker board or in real life.
No I am just trying to keep all you fags apprised at who is cheating on who. I am sort of a straight male fag hag. That is why I wave the rainbow flag, so you guys know who is safe. Remember "I will go with you" if you get scared I will protect you from the gay bashers.

Better clean up your trailer trash this weekend, pockface. Your Dungan Street neighbors are complaining again.
. Originally Posted by lustylad

Sorry you got me confused with DSK. I am not the one who knows where the slum is in Mckinney. Look we all know you and rey have a thing going. I suggest you drop HSK ans stick to rey. I know he is a candy ass but do you really want to spend the rest of your life hearing HFC talk about himself?

Are they upset over all of the used condoms left throw all over his yard AGAIN ? ! The neighbors should have figured that out one MT Fluffer hoisted the rainbow flag in his yard ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Did you throw your condoms out again? The last time all of DSK's kids thought they were those balloons for making animals cause they were so skinny.

Is this held at the HEB? Originally Posted by R.M.

We tried but Gey rey can only stay for 5 minutes we had to move it to his house. From what I can tell he lives next door to DSK or at least Lusty thinks so.

Toilet Slave: Why is it some of you become others mouth pieces?

Hmmm, because you took swipes at me in the posts that you made in response to them? You do realize that I'm treating these debates like a combat operation, do you? Fire in my direction, I'm going to fire back, regardless of which direction you're firing at. It's that simple.

If you don't want me "responding for others", then you need to think about the consequences of your actions. Not taking swipes at me, in your responses towards others, would help in that end.

Toilet Slave: Can he not answer for himself?

Yes, he's able to answer for himself. It just happened that I came here before he did, saw you taking swipes at me, and I responded in kind. As you can see, he is quite capable of replying for himself and for others as well. It's a strategy that we use the military as well, where the primary target of one is a secondary target of another, and vice versa, to ensure thorough destruction. In this case to ensure your arguments destruction.

Toilet Slave: Just send him a PM and he can copy and paste it.

No point in doing that if his reply is going to take a different path in destroying you. I'm simply destroying you in one way, based on your attempts to take a swipe at me with the false assumption that I wasn't going to reply to your response to someone else.

Toilet Slave: Seems like that is how he gets most of his replies anyway.

Wrong. He gets his information from his information sources, then does with them what you fail to do with the propaganda that you get... He analyzes and synthesizes his information. Then, he presents his arguments. Unlike you, who is force feed propaganda, who accepts propaganda hook, line, and sinker, and who also gets his arguments by being a toilet slave, he doesn't need to be assigned his responses.

Toilet Slave: Nobody gives a shit what you have to say.

You proved yourself wrong. If nobody gave a shit about what I have to say, nobody would reply to me. As lustylad pointed out, you most certainly would not have replied to me.

If you didn't care about what I had to say, you wouldn't have quickly logged back on as soon as I started destroying your replies, and you most definitely wouldn't be reading my replies, or responding to them. THAT'S how much you care about what I have to say.

Toilet Slave: It is just the same garbage with a few words changed over and over again. (REPEAT POINT)

Again, notice how I keep replying to you point by point. If you feel like I'm "giving you the same thing", it's because you're saying the same thing over and over again. If you feel like I've "reworded" the same message, it's because you reworded your replies. If you feel like I'm "repeating myself", in these replies, it's because YOU'RE repeating yourself in your replies.

Again, if X, then Y. If you don't want me to repeat something that I said before, then you need to quit repeating what you said before, so as to prevent a repeat of the rebuttal I previously gave you.

Toilet Slave: Shut up and let the adults handle it.

It doesn't work that way. Again, let "X" be your response. Let "Y" be my response. You can't advance "X", then demand that "Y" not be provided to balance out "X". In other words, if you want me to "shut up", you'll need to shut up first. Refrain from advancing "X", your reply, and I won't have a need to respond with "Y". It's THAT simple.

But no, I'm not going to shut up, I'm going to keep preventing you from "typing last". I'm having too much fun doing this.

If you want the adults to handle this situation, then you'll bow out of this argument and do just that. Your replies here don't reflect well on the adult community, especially the latest posts showing that you're disintegrating worse. You're acting like you have a terrible two tantrum person inside of you. You're not acting like an adult on this thread, so you're the one that needs to do as you preach.

Toilet Slave: Be good or your mommy is gonna smother you again.

You should be more focused about balancing out the volume of the poo poo gathered on your face every morning, as your scat mistress provides you with your daily dose or argument, than you are at making false assumptions about reality on my end.

Just because your mom used you as her toilet slave as your gift on your 18th birthday, after you broke the only working toilet bowl in your home, doesn't mean that other people here were treated in obscene ways by their mothers. Perhaps if you weren't that 18-year-old fifth grader struggling to understand fifth grade level English, you would have read and understood the directions on how to use that specific toilet bowl.

Toilet Slave: Reading through all the BS you posted is saddening.

You're so consumed with narcissism driven emotion, in response to my replies, that I highly doubt that you're "reading through" the fact based, logical, reasoned argument destroying your arguments. What you consider as "saddening" is my refusal to let you "type last". I keep hammering you as I have fun destroying your arguments, and watching your reactions.

Toilet Slave: I think you believe all the fabrications you come up with. (Projecting your traits onto opposition)

The only fabrications that exists, between the two of us on this thread, are your replies. I've consistently proved you wrong with a fact based, reasoned, logical argument. You, on the other hand, have consistently failed to defend your position, or to attack my position.

The fact that you've abandoned your original argument, as well as your inductive fallacy arguments, speaks volumes to the fact that we both know that my arguments aren't "fabrications". This is just you projecting your own traits onto me.

Again, I'm giving you a fact based, logical, reasoned argument. Not fabrications. Yes, facts, reason, and logic are easy to believe, your BS, on the other hand, not so much.

Toilet Slave: Wouldn't it be great if everyone was like you and did all those sick things you talk about?

You do you realize that what you see in my username, the rest of society see regarding this hobby, do you? The rest of society consider what we do here, to include your reviews as well as that of ours, as obscene and "sick". This is a perfect example of the pot calling the kettle "black".

We both know the reason why you are attacking the things associated with my username is because you have long ago ran out of argument, and are left with just spewing nonsense as the major portion of your replies.

Toilet Slave: It would make you feel less obscene I bet.

I don't feel obscene for either my fetish or for my actions in this hobby. By your definition, "everybody else" here is also obscene. One thing for sure, there is a good chance that you feel like an idiot when you read the responses to your replies.

Toilet Slave: When you and lusty get back from your honeymoon

Lustylad and I are hammering you from two different areas, during different times of the day. What you label as a "honeymoon" is actually impromptu alliance with those on my side of the argument on one side, and those on your side of the argument on the other side. Our side is destroying your side of the argument.

Toilet Slave: tell him to reply if he likes.

As you can see, that's precisely what he did. Replying to you, and watching you continue to disintegrate, and become more insignificant, is extremely fun. This goes beyond liking to respond to you. Responding to you is great enjoyment.

Toilet Slave: You better hang on to him I know Gey Rey has a thing for him too!

Don't mistake our impromptu coalition, against the dimwits on this board, as the same thing that you, and those on your side of the argument, are doing. That deal with you guys running mobile glory holes in the HEB parking lot? That's just you guys.

Better clean up your trailer trash this weekend, pockface. Your Dungan Street neighbors are complaining again.
. Originally Posted by lustylad

He needs to clean up the excess argument on his face that his SCAT mistress left on him as she was feeding him his new batches of arguments. He doesn't realize that the garbage he left, in his area of operations, would draw attention from him walking around shitfaced, with pieces of his argument dripping down his face.

Are they upset over all of the used condoms left throw all over his yard AGAIN ? ! The neighbors should have figured that out one MT Fluffer hoisted the rainbow flag in his yard ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

That's not the only flag that he hoisted in his yard. Right next to it is a flag with a picture of a toilet slave toilet bowl, and a homemade sign underneath it. It reads, "Will work for poo to keep arguing, God bless!"

Is this held at the HEB? Originally Posted by R.M.

HEB is where his main gig is at, operating this mobile glory hole where he enjoys tube steak sandwiches with plenty of man mayo, and dingle berries. His boss Luke_Wyatt runs this operation. The stuff going on in the trailer park? That's his side job, he has to earn enough money to pay for rent for living in his mom's basement.

probably.

given the way the fluffers fluffing fluff about. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

He fluffs the meat tube flute when that toy monkey bangs its cymbals in his MT cranial cavity, making him feel that he is a part of a duo band.