It's funny how he thinks it's over...isn't it... Originally Posted by WakeupFunnier that you think that I think that it is over. I am not naive, but the public bitching, moaning and speculation "should" have been over a long time ago imo. I would have already shut this pissfest down and let the grown ups do thier job. Fuck 'em they do not like it or the results. Anyone who bitches should step up to lead or stfu.
...but the public bitching, moaning and speculation "should" have been over a long time ago... Originally Posted by MythosIncorrect...
I would have already shut this pissfest down and let the grown ups do thier job. Originally Posted by MythosIncorrect...
Internally, we indians should never know what happens next. Originally Posted by MythosIncorrect...
Thus... we move along. Originally Posted by MythosIncorrect...
Just in general, if a "male" is close friends with a provider and has access (with her permission) to her account, screens and you know, things like that..he's called a pimp?? JA.. Originally Posted by hornfreak
What's the answer for post # 541.....? Mods... Originally Posted by hornfreakIt is possible for a male to have access to a providers account. If it is done behind staff's back, we will find out eventually. At which time it turns into vacation time.
Oh hell no. This is not medical speculation, but at least 2 members would have apoplexy strokes if we did that. From extreme glee. Right DH and Wu.Each case is different I agree with you there. As is each case in every industry. However, everywhere else in the world you will find that there are minimum standards or requirements. Those can be dates, times, phone numbers, screen shots of communications, emails between the parties, receipts, video/photographic evidence. I realize some of what I listed is not relevant to hooker land, but some are and there should be something that you Mods look for as MINIMUM required evidence.
Have you noticed that there are few rules but many guidelines on the board? The answer to your question is simple, but yet not. You have to supply info which shows that the review is true. It could be just one item. It make take 20 smaller items which add to the whole. As you said, each case is different. Originally Posted by Pistolero
I am not always correct. Originally Posted by WakeupYou saying anything is incorrect hardly makes it thus. I said I respected your honest nature... I did not always say you were always right. I believe you speak the truth, as you believe it, again, this does not make you always right. Sometimes you are, imo, sometimes you are not. Posturing does nothing for me.
You saying anything is incorrect hardly makes it thus. I said I respected your honest nature... I did not always say you were always right. I believe you speak the truth, as you believe it, again, this does not make you always right. Sometimes you are, imo, sometimes you are not. Posturing does nothing for me. Originally Posted by MythosHow is this different from anyone else on the board? I am sure the majority of the people here don't say things that are not the truth as they see it.
How is this different from anyone else on the board? I am sure the majority of the people here don't say things that are not the truth as they see it. Originally Posted by gtomanI did not say it was, however; his manner is pointedly different than others, imo. I respect that about him. Good grief people, not everything is an issue. All you fuckers need to lighten the hell up.