So from your carefully crafted rhetoric, are we to assume then that if he didn’t suck as a bomber, you would support him? Or if he had somehow succeeded rather than being an “attempted bomber?”
Coy?
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
That would be a terrible and incorrect assumption. I object to him being called a bomber at all.
He built prop bombs, meant to scare people, but he had neither the requisite skill nor resources to create a proper bomb, thank God. His bomb was a pussy bomb, built by a pussy who was too fucking stupid to actually detonate a bomb. A half assed moron could explode a bomb.
Those fucking liberals in the 60's and 70's exploded bombs and killed people on a regular basis, and they are heroes today to the very assholes acting so offended by this loser mailing fake bombs. If dumbass hippy radicals could blow shit up with homemade bombs 50 years ago, I would think it would be real easy to do these days, what with the internet and all.
This guy was likely led around by some unknown operative whispering in his ear that he could be a real man if he just mailed fake bombs and scared people.
As for rhetoric, he is more useful for Democrat political purposes than for those of us who wish for a better America.
