Joe Manchin came through!

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-20-2021, 06:33 PM
Psssst, It’s RINO. Republican In Name Only. Rhino’s are animals with big horns. Originally Posted by bambino
You ever use a rhino horn for a prostrate massage?

Maybe that is the root of all this election anger.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
Global temperatures are on the rise and have been for decades, step inside the data and see the magnitude of climate change.




For more Immersive stories click here. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Any reviews on the Augmented Reality?















The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Any reviews on the Augmented Reality?

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

i left that in my post intentionally for you. and you fell for it. again.


why did they stop calling it "global warming"? because that fraud Dr. Mann's hockey stick graph didn't pan out so they had to change it to "climate change", possibly the most ambiguous false term ever invented.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
i left that in my post intentionally for you. and you fell for it. again.


why did they stop calling it "global warming"? because that fraud Dr. Mann's hockey stick graph didn't pan out so they had to change it to "climate change", possibly the most ambiguous false term ever invented. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
From the guy who denied the warming of the Earth.
















The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
From the guy who denied the warming of the Earth.

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

i do deny it because the data behind that ridiculous presentation is false and has been faked for decades to push this false narrative.








https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hElTSfQEdsk
... Ye Christ! ... HOW did we get from Joe Manchin to
the economy and global warming all in one thread?!

... Like a sad patchel of joeys in a tacker...

Any of you droobs wanna barney about abortion or the
higher prices of tea in London??

#### Salty
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
Salty... That was only because BBB had a number of climate change provisions in it.


Climate change is one of the biggiest and sleaziest scam ever perpetrated on humanity.
lustylad's Avatar
... Hmmm... I don't quite see it that-way, mate.

I don't fancy Mitt Romney - I surely believe he's a
backstabbing lout who can't be trusted. Originally Posted by Salty Again

Hey mate,

Romney could have been trusted to tame runaway federal spending - and that's 99% of what I care about.

When he was campaigning, I read he would iron his own shirts instead of spending $5 to have the hotel clean and press them. He buys his shirts at Costco too.

That's exactly the fucking mentality we needed in 2012 - and we need even more today - to slay the federal spending monster!
... Hmmmmmm... surely reckon we'll see.

#### Salty
Yssup Rider's Avatar
From the east end to Melbourne in one sentence.

Talented!

At least you had the good sense to point out that the boyz can’t help but work in the talking points du hour into every conversation.

But I am disappointed we haven’t gotten to abortion yet.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHSLLLLEM MINGS
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-21-2021, 10:04 AM
Hey mate,

Romney could have been trusted to tame runaway federal spending - and that's 99% of what I care about.

When he was campaigning, I read he would iron his own shirts instead of spending $5 to have the hotel clean and press them. He buys his shirts at Costco too.

That's exactly the fucking mentality we needed in 2012 - and we need even more today - to slay the federal spending monster! Originally Posted by lustylad
I like Mitt too. All those Mormons r really. Got a place up in Park City and they are a frugal bunch.


But this was from an article I provided you in another thread.


According to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, President Obama’s long-term budget plan would allow publicly held debt as a fraction of GDP to rise further, up to 75%, within a decade. Mitt Romney’s proposal, featuring tax cuts and defense spending increases and as-yet-unspecified (and thus less than fully credible) entitlement reform, appears worse. It would probably drive publicly held debt to 95% of GDP over the same period. Put differently, though both are serious and pragmatic men, neither major party’s presidential candidate is adequately stepping up to the plate, with Romney’s plan the more troubling of the two.
  • Tiny
  • 12-21-2021, 10:17 AM
Hey mate,

Romney could have been trusted to tame runaway federal spending - and that's 99% of what I care about.

When he was campaigning, I read he would iron his own shirts instead of spending $5 to have the hotel clean and press them. He buys his shirts at Costco too.

That's exactly the fucking mentality we needed in 2012 - and we need even more today - to slay the federal spending monster! Originally Posted by lustylad
Absolutely! Salty and WD, I think if you look beyond his preppie image and criticism of Trump you’ll like what you see.
  • Tiny
  • 12-21-2021, 10:28 AM
I like Mitt too. All those Mormons r really. Got a place up in Park City and they are a frugal bunch.


But this was from an article I provided you in another thread.


According to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, President Obama’s long-term budget plan would allow publicly held debt as a fraction of GDP to rise further, up to 75%, within a decade. Mitt Romney’s proposal, featuring tax cuts and defense spending increases and as-yet-unspecified (and thus less than fully credible) entitlement reform, appears worse. It would probably drive publicly held debt to 95% of GDP over the same period. Put differently, though both are serious and pragmatic men, neither major party’s presidential candidate is adequately stepping up to the plate, with Romney’s plan the more troubling of the two. Originally Posted by WTF
WTF, Note, “publicly held debt.” Not gross debt.

While he was a bit of a hawk, he wouldn’t have outspent Obama. The Democrats went kind of crazy on the spending side in 2009 and 2010, when they controlled Congress.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
Romney and his magic underware are okay by me. Respectable.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTsQjfYUSEc
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-21-2021, 10:40 AM
WTF, Note, “publicly held debt.” Not gross debt.

While he was a bit of a hawk, he wouldn’t have outspent Obama. The Democrats went kind of crazy on the spending side in 2009 and 2010, when they controlled Congress. Originally Posted by Tiny
Yea they were both worse on the gross debt side!

Like I said...I liked Romney.

Who knows what would have happened.

Obama did reduce his deficits from his first 4 years.

But we can't say what Romney would have done....but I do know you're not cutting deficits and debt without cutting military spending.