Originally Posted by texassapperAnd which SpaceX billionaire would benefit from this kind of deregulation?
Conflict of interest?
Yeah only one guy in the entire would benefit from deregulation. Originally Posted by texassapperNo but putting Musk in charge of deregulation is putting the fox in charge of the hen house.
Originally Posted by txdot-guyand when the govt collapses cos there arent enough people to run the day-to-day operations (for whatever reason - layoffs, firings, resignations, etc),
No but putting Musk in charge of deregulation is putting the fox in charge of the hen house.
His businesses have to comply with these regulations and he has a large financial incentive to create and follow only those regulations that don’t interfere with his business. Regardless of the outcome to the public at large.
It’s a perfect example of the kind of patronage system that Trump and the conservatives are trying to implement in Washington.
They don’t like the bureaucratic system we have now and are under the illusion that staffing the government with loyalists will somehow make things better. Originally Posted by txdot-guy
Comer to create DOGE subcommittee chaired by Marjorie Taylor Greene to work with Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy
Ramaswamy tells Fox News Digital he and his team have already met with Comer and Greene and they 'look forward to working together'
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/com...ivek-ramaswamy
This isn’t about government efficiency but is rather a political witch hunt to root out people they don’t like and recommend them for termination. All run by MTG.
Sounds like McCarthyism to me.
The American Heritage Dictionary gives the definition of McCarthyism as: 1. The political practice of publicizing accusations of disloyalty or subversion with insufficient regard to evidence; and 2. The use of methods of investigation and accusation regarded as unfair, in order to suppress opposition. Originally Posted by txdot-guy