.... I suspect that will be all they need. Had any of you Obama haters listened to the science you would have seen this successful conclusion too. Thus my thread. This is a way for you to bash Obama , when in fact you should wind up tipping your hat and saying, "Job well done."
Originally Posted by WTF
"The Science" coming from you is rich. No, Obama said that the possibility of Ebola making our shores was "extreme small" just weeks before it hit the shores.
Then his CDC director said that "Any hospital with isolation unit can treat an Ebola patient." What happens? Two nurses get the disease and Duncan dies.
Then the CDC waits to whisk the nurses off (which they have the resources to do) to hospitals that can effectively treat the disease without the caregivers becoming victims themselves.
From what I read yesterday, the American Embassy in Liberia is still handing out travel visa.
No, this has more more to do with "competence" than "cost/benefit" analysis.
Everything has a cost/benefit analysis. That you do not agree with this one , yet you did with the 2003 invasion of Iraq tells me all I need to know.
Originally Posted by WTF
You are WTF the moronic buffoon. Can't even keep your own thread on topic. I look forward to examining the pre-2004 numbers and sources you used in your 2003 Iraq invasion cost/benefit analysis.
I'd rather catch Ebola than spend a day with that self centered bitch.
Originally Posted by WTF
In the unlikely event Kimmy spent a day with me, Ebola would be the last thing she caught.