This is post #46. How do I refer to a post that hasn't happened? Why do you have so much invested in the government's story about this? Why is it so important that this story be true, in light of all the lies the government has told us?
I don't know what proof would be sufficient. The official story may well be true. But I am not going to believe it just because the government says it. The leaked emails cast a lot of suspicion about the official story. Those were obviously emails the government didn't want exposed. I wonder why?
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Oops. Bad eyesight. Post #41.
Shouldn't the question be why do you and others have so much invested in framing the story of OBL's death as a lie? Why is it so important to you that it be false?
I don't see anything in the record that indicates the story is not true. What makes you think those e-mail are real? How do you know the government even CARES about them? Did the government call you and tell you it was concerned?
The government does not have the time or the resources to refute every false rumor and outright lie that gets spread on the Internet.
What makes anyone think the speculation of two guys in a private company are definitive about what happened to OBL's body? They sound like they are both repeating rumors. You are doing the same right now. Does that enhance its reliability or detract from it?