Female clients?

I dont think we disagree at all. But as a provider, I am just more inclined to take a PC approach in my writings on here. From a business perspective, imo, I have plenty to lose if I'm not careful about how I word things... :-) Originally Posted by VegasJen

I understand, Jen.

We've had a few ladies post a review of their memorable encounter with another lady. Some have used the standard review format, and all were posted in the Co-Ed section. They've been some of the hottest reviews I've ever read! Originally Posted by CoverMe

Exactly! Which is why they should have been in the review section where they belong. I understand that doing it that way is making the best of a crappy situation, but it shouldn't be that way in the first place

We've had a few ladies post a review of their memorable encounter with another lady. Some have used the standard review format, and all were posted in the Co-Ed section. They've been some of the hottest reviews I've ever read! Originally Posted by CoverMe

That's great and all, but I can see DakineOne's point. It's like sloppy seconds.

Exactly! Which is why they should have been in the review section where they belong. I understand that doing it that way is making the best of a crappy situation, but it shouldn't be that way in the first place Originally Posted by DakineOne777

A review is a review. It should be handled the same way regardless of who writes it. No different that abolition or women's suffrage. But sadly there are usually people who have vested interests in not doing the right thing.

Storytime.....

I used to be a very active patron of strip clubs. I've perviously asked why I couldn't post a review of my experiences in the review forum and so have the ability to keep my ROS hidden. I'm sorry but I really did not want the girls to get mad at me because I said something not super flattering. Private tags do not work for me. I still don't understand why providers can't write reviews. A mod has to assign PA credit so it's not like the providers will start popping up in the locker room.

As for female clients being treated like the male ones on this site....again this site is way too paranoid about providers making another profile and then gaining access to the "supar sekret man cave". They could try implementing a female client verification procedure such as multiple UNAFFILIATED providers vouching for them or in this thread's particular case proof that the female client is the controller of another well-established review board account.

That's great and all, but I can see DakineOne's point. It's like sloppy seconds. Originally Posted by Hurricane805

Thank you!

A review is a review. It should be handled the same way regardless of who writes it. No different that abolition or women's suffrage. But sadly there are usually people who have vested interests in not doing the right thing. Originally Posted by Old-T

Agree 1000% with you, Old-T. At least part of it is the "it ain't broke so don't fix it" mentality. But it seriously DOES need fixing.

Storytime.....

I used to be a very active patron of strip clubs. I've perviously asked why I couldn't post a review of my experiences in the review forum and so have the ability to keep my ROS hidden. I'm sorry but I really did not want the girls to get mad at me because I said something not super flattering. Private tags do not work for me. I still don't understand why providers can't write reviews. A mod has to assign PA credit so it's not like the providers will start popping up in the locker room.

As for female clients being treated like the male ones on this site....again this site is way too paranoid about providers making another profile and then gaining access to the "supar sekret man cave". They could try implementing a female client verification procedure such as multiple UNAFFILIATED providers vouching for them or in this thread's particular case proof that the female client is the controller of another well-established review board account. Originally Posted by SA Angel

You make great points, SA Angel. They could easily find a way to accommodate everybody and make this a fair and equal system with little to no drama. But they appear to be very close-minded here.

What really upsets me is the fact that TS providers (99% of whom are pre-op so they are still biologically MALE) can post ads and have provider profiles. That is a complete and utter DOUBLE STANDARD!!!! How does ECCIE justify allowing TS men into the provider areas but continue to block women from the customer areas? Is this selective misogynistic homophobia? How do they justify this obvious double standard?

What really upsets me is the fact that TS providers (99% of whom are pre-op so they are still biologically MALE) can post ads and have provider profiles. That is a complete and utter DOUBLE STANDARD!!!! How does ECCIE justify allowing TS men into the provider areas but continue to block women from the customer areas? Is this selective misogynistic homophobia? How do they justify this obvious double standard? Originally Posted by DakineOne777

Interesting point about TS posts on this site.
I'd love to hear the admin's rational on that one.

I think that some ladies have a few ‘ lady friends with benefits’ in the hobby. Originally Posted by ugotme10

Maybe, but it goes both ways. A provider could read the reviews(and I am sure many have) if she wanted to. This isn't a good argument for not allowing women to write reviews.

. But sadly there are usually people who have vested interests in not doing the right thing. Originally Posted by Old-T

But what are these vested interests you speak of?

Maybe, but it goes both ways. A provider could read the reviews(and I am sure many have) if she wanted to. This isn't a good argument for not allowing women to write reviews. Originally Posted by Vitamin

I agree that a statement like that does the opposite and undermines what I am asking for. But I don't think that was posted as a support but as just an observation.




I PM'd the admin for my local board (since no one from this board ever replied), and he replied as if I were a provider. Idiot. Check it out:

#9 - No form of private communications between members are to be posted in our forums. This includes the contents of emails, PMs, IMs, private chat logs, privately shared images, etc. This is an invasion of another's privacy and will not be allowed.

LMAO - Apparently either he's dumber than a bag of hammers or it is so beyond his ability to comprehend that there may be lady hobbyists out there that he vomited up the above drivel assuming that I was a provider w/o bothering to really read my PM.
Let's see how my response goes over

It really makes you wonder:
--did they not read it? or
--did they not comprehend?

I agree that a statement like that does the opposite and undermines what I am asking for. But I don't think that was posted as a support but as just an observation.




I PM'd the admin for my local board (since no one from this board ever replied), and he replied as if I were a provider. Idiot. Check it out:

#9 - No form of private communications between members are to be posted in our forums. This includes the contents of emails, PMs, IMs, private chat logs, privately shared images, etc. This is an invasion of another's privacy and will not be allowed.

LMAO - Apparently either he's dumber than a bag of hammers or it is so beyond his ability to comprehend that there may be lady hobbyists out there that he vomited up the above drivel assuming that I was a provider w/o bothering to really read my PM.
Let's see how my response goes over Originally Posted by DakineOne777

It really makes you wonder:
--did they not read it? or
--did they not comprehend?

Originally Posted by Old-T

Not sure, but either way he's an idiot.

He did reply, and that response was a joke too, so I told him where he & the owner can stick it.
I probably hurt his itty-bitty feelings so I'll no doubt get banned, which is probably how they deal with anyone (especially a WOMAN! OMG!) who disagrees with them, calls them on it, and they have no viable answer.

I do know that (some) of the ladies read the reviews and sometimes manage to bite their tongue about posting a reply or rebuttal to what was written.

I do know that (some) of the ladies read the reviews and sometimes manage to bite their tongue about posting a reply or rebuttal to what was written. Originally Posted by ugotme10

Do tell. Psychic? Or is it that ladies kiss n tell?

Reminds me of a funny story...martini's n keyboarding. LOL. Not a good combo. ijs

Not sure, but either way he's an idiot.

He did reply, and that response was a joke too, so I told him where he & the owner can stick it.
I probably hurt his itty-bitty feelings so I'll no doubt get banned, which is probably how they deal with anyone (especially a WOMAN! OMG!) who disagrees with them, calls them on it, and they have no viable answer. Originally Posted by DakineOne777

Seems like the mods here all obediently drink the Kool Aid and never question any policies coming from Boss Hogg.

I'm voyeuristically curious if any of you ladies have entertained a single female (not part of a couple) as a client? Someone who wanted to try being with another woman with no strings. Doooo tell. Originally Posted by Satyrrical

Although I'm a rub and tug girl, I've seen several female clients.
A few regulars actually. Ladies like Happy endings too

This one client comes in once a month for a 90min appt from Waco.
She is fucking GORGOUS! Just flawless. First time I saw her it came time for the ending and she squirted. I've never seen that before she I jumped back like "what the dick was that?!" While I'm looking around to make sure no little alien is running around the floor or anything She says "omg that's never happened before" I called her a liar, congratulated her and told her she could take those sheets with her lol
Next time she came in she walks into my office and starts cracking up and calls me an asshole.
I was wearing rain boots and had laid a piece of tarp on the floor

That was 2 years ago.. And to this day is one of my favorite clients

I agree that a statement like that does the opposite and undermines what I am asking for. But I don't think that was posted as a support but as just an observation.




I PM'd the admin for my local board (since no one from this board ever replied), and he replied as if I were a provider. Idiot. Check it out:

#9 - No form of private communications between members are to be posted in our forums. This includes the contents of emails, PMs, IMs, private chat logs, privately shared images, etc. This is an invasion of another's privacy and will not be allowed.

LMAO - Apparently either he's dumber than a bag of hammers or it is so beyond his ability to comprehend that there may be lady hobbyists out there that he vomited up the above drivel assuming that I was a provider w/o bothering to really read my PM.
Let's see how my response goes over Originally Posted by DakineOne777

Ohhhhhhh DakineOne broke a rule! Number 9 rule! IN RED!!!! OMFG!!!!

Hey DakineOne - you gonna get a lawyer? I know a guy

Although I'm a rub and tug girl, I've seen several female clients.
A few regulars actually. Ladies like Happy endings too

This one client comes in once a month for a 90min appt from Waco.
She is fucking GORGOUS! Just flawless. First time I saw her it came time for the ending and she squirted. I've never seen that before she I jumped back like "what the dick was that?!" While I'm looking around to make sure no little alien is running around the floor or anything She says "omg that's never happened before" I called her a liar, congratulated her and told her she could take those sheets with her lol
Next time she came in she walks into my office and starts cracking up and calls me an asshole.
I was wearing rain boots and had laid a piece of tarp on the floor

That was 2 years ago.. And to this day is one of my favorite clients Originally Posted by Little Miss Cuntcakes

I'm getting some pretty amazing visuals from your post, Little Miss CC