Not Guilty on all counts

Wow! You guys are delusional. Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Explain?

Get triggered often... Originally Posted by bb1961

Why would I be triggered? I'm not a howler monkey.

Explain? Originally Posted by Turd Ferguson ATX

Somebody said Rittenhouse was going to get a trillion dollars....that is delusional

Why are people like you who resent white Americans obsessed with trailer parks? Originally Posted by Turd Ferguson ATX

Do you live in one? Did you grow up in One? Do you aspire to move up to that status?

From what I read you wrote far more than “Trump has a right” it was more along the lines of “evidence of fraud this and evidence of fraud that” and “it’ll be presented in court this” and “supreme will decide that”. But if you say you said “trumps gonna lose because everything the Republican congressman and he and his attys are saying is fake false and bullshit” I missed that. But it’s a lot to read so it may (not) be there.

Anyway, Next you’ll be saying the McMichaels will will walk because it’s self defense there too. At least that’s what he’s claiming as his defense.

Since I’m gonna start sport betting on court cases, please provide me your grand wisdom so we can all make money off your magic ball. Originally Posted by NoirMan

And once AGAIN, you offer no proof to back up your assertions but I guess I ought to be use to that by now. Nope, I never argued the fraud angle other than to say that a couple of States illegally, according to their Constitution, made changes to their voting laws and that "might be" grounds for review. Apparently the SC didn't want to get involved in a States rights matter.


And saying "the Supreme Court will decide that" is supporting Trump some how? Didn't you say the same damn thing with regard to this case?



Glad you brought up the McMichaels case since you were making the case that the cases were the same. They were not. Sure, in both cases self defense was claimed but in that case, the McMicaels were the aggressor. They ran after Arbery, he did run towards them in an aggressive manner like the 3 idiots in the Rittenhouse case. McMichaels will say that Arbery tried to take McMichaels gun away and that provided him with a self defense plea but "the aggressor angle" carries more weight in my lay, legal opinion. I'd bet that is exactly what the Rittenhouse jurors would say. Brown case, Brown ran towards the cop. Martin case, he ran towards Zimerman and attacked him, physically attacked him not merely trying to take the gun away. One has to consider all the evidence and then apply the law not "feelings"



I think the McMicaels will be found guilty and should be found guilty. Two very similar but different cases

I do not claim to be an economist, far from it. Originally Posted by WTF

No, you just claim to understand economics better than any economist does.

You don't understand the difference between empirical and polemical. All of your posts are in the latter category.

The only thing you're consistent about is saying dim-retards deserve credit for every positive economic trend that occurs on their watch, but every negative trend is somehow owned by Republicans.

Then when Republicans are in office, every positive economic trend is merely a continuation of what the last dim-retard administration started, while every negative trend is entirely of their own making.

Your bottom line is - no matter who is President, dim-retards get 100% of any credit, Republicans get 100% of any blame.

And whenever you're corrected with facts and (empirical) data, you say the person correcting you is a "partisan hack" lol.

Somebody said Rittenhouse was going to get a trillion dollars....that is delusional Originally Posted by WTF

Like the 3.5 trillion that the libtards say won't cost anything...

I said early on it looked like he would walk. Especially after the Judge got rid of the weapons charge.

I also have said there will be no rioting. Originally Posted by WTF

... YES, you did.

... BUT - we shall see IF there's riots and what-not.
It aint dark yet.

... I surely believe we may see some riots
and destruction of property over the next
day or two... Around the country.

### Salty

Somebody said Rittenhouse was going to get a trillion dollars....that is delusional Originally Posted by WTF

... Obviously the "trillion dollars" was for Exclamation.

But the Rittenhouse lad DOES have proper standing to
SUE the Bastards who are slandering his good name
to defame him.

.. Good for him.

### Salty

https://twitter.com/Brick_Suit/statu...862561280?s=19

But the Rittenhouse lad DOES have proper standing to SUE the Bastards who are slandering his good name to defame him.

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Do you really think Rittenhouse would win a defamation case?

He took a gun to a dangerous location and killed two people.

I doubt any jury will give him money. Just my opinion.

Do you really think Rittenhouse would win a defamation case?

He took a gun to a dangerous location and killed two people.

I doubt any jury will give him money. Just my opinion. Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Yes, he can. Plus, he was acquitted on all charges. He voluntarily handed over his phone. No evidence of White Supremacy contacts, Information what so ever. No evidence anywhere of it.

Im hoping that Kyle is balls deep in some whores cum shoot celebrating

Do you really think Rittenhouse would win a defamation case?

He took a gun to a dangerous location and killed two people.

I doubt any jury will give him money. Just my opinion. Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

... Won't make it to a jury, mate.
The news outlets will settle and PAY $$$ him.
YOU been watching the wrong media reports
on things... Look around at some conservative
ones so YOU can make up yer-own mind.

He brought the weapon for protection as he
was working as a voulanteer aide at the time.

As far as "crossing state lines" HE lives 20k
away from where he was - right off the state line,
and WORKED in the area...

Anyhow - defamation is defamation. He's NOT a Murderer
as he acted in self-defence... "Sue the Bastards!"

#### Salty

From what I read you wrote far more than “Trump has a right” it was more along the lines of “evidence of fraud this and evidence of fraud that” and “it’ll be presented in court this” and “supreme will decide that”.



"Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we attempt to deceive". Let's see, you joined this board Sep 29th 2021. Pretty sure everything you are talking about, sorry, making up, happened long before that. So you went back and researched what I wrote but you can't provide quotes, only crap that you make up? Or, you are the banned 1bm1 and still making up crap you can't prove.



Since I’m gonna start sport betting on court cases, please provide me your grand wisdom so we can all make money off your magic ball. Originally Posted by NoirMan

I'll provide the wisdom that you NEED when ever you want. Just remember don't bet against me. Imagine how much money you could have lost arguing against me in the Rittenhouse case