Look up the name Lloyd Mark Bucher. It may give you a little more information. I spoke of Hummers, trucks, cars, and other such equipment. Not one word FROM ME about guns (I don't think they have naval guns at the embassy), rifles, pistols, code machines or anything like this. You keep adding things to what I am supposed to have said so you can attack me for something I didn't say. Is this going to be how you handle everything on here?
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Look at your first post in this thread. You mused on how well-armed the marines would be and spoke of them being able to defend themselves. What the fuck else am I supposed to think you're referring to if not for guns? You never said a word about truck, cars or anything else. I didn't add shit. I merely echoed what the article said. Your problem is with them then, not me. You don't know what they have at a US Embassy that would need destroying when vacating it, but you pontificate on it? It's pretty standard.
Here's what you said, just so we're clear:
"I wonder how well armed our "future hostages" ummm, Marines are. Can they protect themselves and have they been given orders that they can protect themselves? Where is Obama when we need to know these things?
Meanwhile back in that foreign policy success called Yemen, our equipment is being taken over by jihadists and drone flights are not longer possible out of that country. Over 60% of the drone flights in the Middle East have come from Yemen. So this is a strategic defeat for the Obama and the US."