Well, I guess at least three people read it!
You read my position. Sorry you don't care to comprehend it. I am not going to put my sources at risk to humor you. It doesn't work that way.
Just about all of everything you wrote was irrelevant. I don't care about your credentials but how about some names of some very public people. Even the press doesn't use your excuse. Public people and we should know their names. Why would you shield a racist former democrat staffer is beyond me. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornI have known quite a number of staffers over the years, on the state and national levels who did not share political ideology with their bosses. It's the job, dipshit.
You are correct, IB will read it. He can't help himself, he is stalking me. Fortunately I recognize him as annoying but harmless.You are a lying son of a bitch, Old-THUMPER. If there ever was a trollish stalker it is you, Old-THUMPER. Have you ever made it a whole month without casting an unprovoked, lame-ass insult in my direction, like you've done in this thread three times now, Old-THUMPER? There's more than ample evidence to show where your pathetic dumb-ass has been stalking my posts for over two years now, Old-THUMPER, or do you want to continue discuss examples of your stupidity, Old-THUMPER.
PS: Thanks for quoting it. That way people who ARE literate have two opportunities to read it.
Originally Posted by Old-T
You are a lying son of a bitch, Old-THUMPER. If there ever was a trollish stalker it is you, Old-THUMPER. Have you ever made it a whole month without casting an unprovoked, lame-ass insult in my direction, like you've done in this thread three times now, Old-THUMPER? There's more than ample evidence to show where your pathetic dumb-ass has been stalking my posts for over two years now, Old-THUMPER, or do you want to continue discuss examples of your stupidity, Old-THUMPER. Originally Posted by I B HankeringTemper, temper!
Temper, temper!You trollishly threw out a direct insult at post #2, Old-THUMPER. Did you honestly expect not to be directly addressed and called on your insult at post #2, Old-THUMPER? Are you really that stupid, Old-THUMPER? You received a reply to your insult, Old-THUMPER! A true and proper example of 'stalking' is YOU, Old-THUMPER, at post #340 in this other thread: http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1056...&postcount=340
There you go again with your lies and insults little IB! But they just aren't true.
I said you would read my post. You obviously did. TRUTH!!!!
I said you would stalk me. I added post #2 on this thread, you immediately quote me in post #3. I post in #4, you stalk me in #5. The same with your posts #13 and this one. YOU are coming behind MY posts. YOU are the stalker. TRUTH!!!! Originally Posted by Old-T
You trollishly threw out a direct insult at post #2, Old-THUMPER. Did you honestly expect not to be directly addressed and called on your insult at post #2, Old-THUMPER? Are you really that stupid, Old-THUMPER? You received a reply to your insult, Old-THUMPER! A true and proper example of 'stalking' is YOU, Old-THUMPER, at post #340 in this other thread: http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1056...&postcount=340All anyone has to do is watch you follow I'va Biggen around to know the truth about you, poultry dick!
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Gay Broadway musical afficionado!You're the "gay Broadway musical aficionado", you Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.
IBIdiot continues to use a mythical language to make a point that nobody understands.
Kind of like MOST everything he calls people repeatedly in each post.
What an imbecile! When was the last time you made a point in any discussion in ENGLISH, imbecilic douchebag? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Poor IIFFy. Trying so hard to act all grown up. No, that was NOT the point of my post to JD that you quoted. The main point, very clearly stated, was about discretion--and a good operative protecting their sources. Originally Posted by Old-T