Raid during massage

DNinja69's Avatar
You are misleading people. Period.

So you are going to argue with the cop that the cop lacked probable cause to arrest you and based on YOUR evaluation of PC you are refusing to identify yourself to him? And you are giving that kind of advice to an anonymous person on a blog board?

Since you are a lawyer, you will be FREE to assist them with the legal problems they have gotten themselves into by following your BLOG ADVICE!!! All they need to do is PM for your bar license number so they can get your RW contact information for when they are in jail after following your advice.

Before you dig too deep a hole you should probably review the LEGAL DEFINITION OF "ARREST" and "PROBABLE CAUSE"!

So here is the customary scenario in a spa: naked with condoms and money changing hands. Good luck with winning your "PC" DEBATE!!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover
LexusLover for someone who so openly objects to legal advice being given in this forum, you are certainly doing quite a bit of it.
Lapdog's Avatar
LexusLover for someone who so openly objects to legal advice being given in this forum, you are certainly doing quite a bit of it. Originally Posted by DNinja69
He just does it to increase his post count and show us his "expertise" with "quotation marks".
Don't talk and play dumb.
LexusLover's Avatar
LexusLover for someone who so openly objects to legal advice being given in this forum, you are certainly doing quite a bit of it. Originally Posted by DNinja69
I suppose there are a number of false statements all rolled into those three lines, but if I recall correctly, my "advice" was to hire an attorney and discuss the matter with the hired attorney. That's not "legal advice." That's sound, practical advice.

One should understand the distinction between "legal advice" and "legal opinions" before attempting to criticize a poster for doing either one.

As for an "increased post" count ... most those "counts" have been "EARNED" responding to disrespectful, uninformed, meaningless remarks by persons who lack any substantial substance in the way of knowledge about the topic who cast aspersions in an effort to dissuade someone who is knowledgeable from continuing the discussion. It works on folks who have insecurities about that which they write and speak, and it's normally used by those who do have insecurities.

Now, do you see why my post count is so high. Fertile fields.
Russ38's Avatar
The outcome of most interactions with L.E. is determined by your common sense, attitude & demeanor regardless of the circumstances or "hard facts". Sure there are some "by the book" types & very few are straight up dicks, as long as you don't come at them with any "sovereign citizen" type of b.s. things usually go fine.
Not giving advice just speaking from my experiences over the years. Originally Posted by MarcellusWalluz
Exactly what I was speaking of earlier in this thread....has nothing to do with “outsmarting” LE....It’s how you read and interact....basically knowing how to work and keep your shit together regardless......