If the global warming crowd has lost Walter Cronkite then they've lost the war

Ok, What kind of bullshit are you trying start? Nobody gives a shit about you, who you are, or who's dick you're sucking. You're obviously just another flame artist.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Hahaha Mojo Jojo seems awfully pissed today. Must not be getting as many dicks in his mouth as he's used to!

Well, ShamWow, you're the one who said you were going to turn your attention to a "cock or two". Now you can live your lifestyle however you want, but why do you use your private practices as a pejorative (look it up) against others?

Yeah, that's about as scientific an argument as the rest of the bullshit you idiots throw up on the issue.

95% of the world's climatologists are in agreement on the issue. But, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity know better......fuuuuuck you. Originally Posted by timpage

I thought thst number was higher.

Totally agree with the Fuuuuck them....

Well, ShamWow, you're the one who said you were going to turn your attention to a "cock or two". Now you can live your lifestyle however you want, but why do you use your private practices as a pejorative (look it up) against others? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Haha it seems that time has retarded CuteOldGAY to the point where he can't tell the difference between a "cockatoo" and a "cock or two"! Your old ass sure loves to talk about cock!

Speaking of old, we sure are glad your are here oldGEEZER! You are in prime position to be inform us on this topic! seeing as you have been around for the better part of the last BILLION years! So tell us, was the weather a little colder when your buddies invented the wheel? what about fire? Boy, I sure am glad you are here!

Haha it seems that time has retarded CuteOldGAY to the point where he can't tell the difference between a "cockatoo" and a "cock or two"! Your old ass sure loves to talk about cock!
Originally Posted by shanm

It should, a "cock or two" is his 'bidness'!

He's quite fond of 'em!

Hahaha Mojo Jojo seems awfully pissed today. Must not be getting as many dicks in his mouth as he's used to! Originally Posted by shanm

Or could it be there is to many Dicks posting on this thread. You could be the poster child for that gig. Now go play with your chemistry set you fucking wannabe.


Jim

Or could it be there is to many Dicks posting on this thread. You could be the poster child for that gig. Now go play with your chemistry set you fucking wannabe. Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Aww looks like Mojo Jojo got his "feelings" hurt! Maybe if you didn't act like a DICK in the first place, people wouldn't be a DICK to you! Hah! its that simple

It should, a "cock or two" is his 'bidness'!

He's quite fond of 'em! Originally Posted by bigtex

Agreed! CuteOldcocklover sure loves his cocks.

Aww looks like Mojo Jojo got his "feelings" hurt! Maybe if you didn't act like a DICK in the first place, people wouldn't be a DICK to you! Hah! its that simple Originally Posted by shanm

That's not happening. I refuse to let a shallow fuck like you hurt my feelings, especially a foreign one.


Jim

Yes, Run that line when the earth becomes uninhabitable in a 1000 years, instead of the trillion we first estimated.

Climate change is inevitable, its been well documented throughout history. What we are doing, as humans, is speeding up that process so that it occurs much faster. We have to think about the future of the human race, not just ourselves. Originally Posted by shanm

It really is very sad that you believe that. All it should take is about 4 hours of sincere investigation and you will discover so many discrepancies that even if you don't get the joke you'll start to question. Questioning leads to enlightenment. And lets can the canard about "climate change", we're talking about global warming. Climate change was just plan B after the evidence of global warming started to fall apart. The climate is always changing and man had nothing to do with it. Hell, I saw an article in USA Today back in 1990 about the changing of the jetstream. It was going to cause dryer, warmer summers in the midwest. There was your global warming. A natural phenomenom that was well understood was used to fool people into panicing. Next bit of knowledge, the jet stream changes about every 20 years. That means we are going through some more changes having to do with jetstream rather than man made global warming.

I will also point out a fatal flaw in your argument; you say that climate change is inevitable. That means nothing can stop it. That also means that nothing can affect it. So we can't speed up the process as our power is so small against something that is unstoppable. So we can't affect climate change, we can't speed it up and we can't stop it. So any expenditure of time or money is purely wasted.

^guaranteed that none of these idiots commenting on climate change have a scientific background whatsoever Originally Posted by shanm

....There's almost complete agreement in the scientific community that the heating is largely due to humans. Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

It looks like the libtard echo chamber is in full blast tonight.... so shammytard and undercunt think everyone with a scientific background agrees? Here's a story from yesterday's WSJ. The author and 6 other top scientists (all well credentialed from places like MIT) are being harassed for their apostasy:



The Political Assault on Climate Skeptics

Members of Congress send inquisitorial letters to universities, energy companies, even think tanks.

By Richard S. Lindzen
March 4, 2015 6:50 p.m. ET

Research in recent years has encouraged those of us who question the popular alarm over allegedly man-made global warming. Actually, the move from “global warming” to “climate change” indicated the silliness of this issue. The climate has been changing since the Earth was formed. This normal course is now taken to be evidence of doom.

Individuals and organizations highly vested in disaster scenarios have relentlessly attacked scientists and others who do not share their beliefs. The attacks have taken a threatening turn.

As to the science itself, it’s worth noting that all predictions of warming since the onset of the last warming episode of 1978-98—which is the only period that the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) attempts to attribute to carbon-dioxide emissions—have greatly exceeded what has been observed. These observations support a much reduced and essentially harmless climate response to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide.

In addition, there is experimental support for the increased importance of variations in solar radiation on climate and a renewed awareness of the importance of natural unforced climate variability that is largely absent in current climate models. There also is observational evidence from several independent studies that the so-called “water vapor feedback,” essential to amplifying the relatively weak impact of carbon dioxide alone on Earth temperatures, is canceled by cloud processes.

There are also claims that extreme weather—hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, floods, you name it—may be due to global warming. The data show no increase in the number or intensity of such events. The IPCC itself acknowledges the lack of any evident relation between extreme weather and climate, though allowing that with sufficient effort some relation might be uncovered.

World leaders proclaim that climate change is our greatest problem, demonizing carbon dioxide. Yet atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide have been vastly higher through most of Earth’s history. Climates both warmer and colder than the present have coexisted with these higher levels.

Currently elevated levels of carbon dioxide have contributed to increases in agricultural productivity. Indeed, climatologists before the recent global warming hysteria referred to warm periods as “climate optima.” Yet world leaders are embarking on costly policies that have no capacity to replace fossil fuels but enrich crony capitalists at public expense, increasing costs for all, and restricting access to energy to the world’s poorest populations that still lack access to electricity’s immense benefits.

Billions of dollars have been poured into studies supporting climate alarm, and trillions of dollars have been involved in overthrowing the energy economy. So it is unsurprising that great efforts have been made to ramp up hysteria, even as the case for climate alarm is disintegrating.

The latest example began with an article published in the New York Times on Feb. 22 about Willie Soon, a scientist at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Mr. Soon has, for over 25 years, argued for a primary role of solar variability on climate. But as Greenpeace noted in 2011, Mr. Soon was, in small measure, supported by fossil-fuel companies over a period of 10 years.

The Times reintroduced this old material as news, arguing that Mr. Soon had failed to list this support in a recent paper in Science Bulletin of which he was one of four authors. Two days later Arizona Rep. Raul Grijalva, the ranking Democrat on the Natural Resources Committee, used the Times article as the basis for a hunting expedition into anything said, written and communicated by seven individuals— David Legates, John Christy, Judith Curry, Robert Balling, Roger Pielke Jr., Steven Hayward and me—about testimony we gave to Congress or other governmental bodies. We were selected solely on the basis of our objections to alarmist claims about the climate.

In letters he sent to the presidents of the universities employing us (although I have been retired from MIT since 2013), Mr. Grijalva wanted all details of all of our outside funding, and communications about this funding, including “consulting fees, promotional considerations, speaking fees, honoraria, travel expenses, salary, compensation and any other monies.” Mr. Grijalva acknowledged the absence of any evidence but purportedly wanted to know if accusations made against Mr. Soon about alleged conflicts of interest or failure to disclose his funding sources in science journals might not also apply to us.

Perhaps the most bizarre letter concerned the University of Colorado’s Mr. Pielke. His specialty is science policy, not science per se, and he supports reductions in carbon emissions but finds no basis for associating extreme weather with climate. Mr. Grijalva’s complaint is that Mr. Pielke, in agreeing with the IPCC on extreme weather and climate, contradicts the assertions of John Holdren, President Obama ’s science czar.

Mr. Grijalva’s letters convey an unstated but perfectly clear threat: Research disputing alarm over the climate should cease lest universities that employ such individuals incur massive inconvenience and expense—and scientists holding such views should not offer testimony to Congress. After the Times article, Sens. Edward Markey (D., Mass.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D., R.I.) and Barbara Boxer (D., Calif.) also sent letters to numerous energy companies, industrial organizations and, strangely, many right-of-center think tanks (including the Cato Institute, with which I have an association) to unearth their alleged influence peddling.

The American Meteorological Society responded with appropriate indignation at the singling out of scientists for their scientific positions, as did many individual scientists. On Monday, apparently reacting to criticism, Mr. Grijalva conceded to the National Journal that his requests for communications between the seven of us and our outside funders was “overreach.”

Where all this will lead is still hard to tell. At least Mr. Grijalva’s letters should help clarify for many the essentially political nature of the alarms over the climate, and the damage it is doing to science, the environment and the well-being of the world’s poorest.

Mr. Lindzen is professor emeritus of atmospheric sciences at MIT and a distinguished senior fellow of the Cato Institute.

.

6 whole scientists that disagree. How cute. And one isn't even a scientist but an expert on science policy. Yes that's valid lol. Read this article. We're dumber as a country than we've ever been.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...g-down-america

6 whole scientists that disagree. How cute. And one isn't even a scientist but an expert on science policy. Yes that's valid lol. Read this article. We're dumber as a country than we've ever been.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...g-down-america Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

You exemplify the "dumb" discussed in your cited article, you "#Grubered" Odumbo Minion, considering it's primarily your generation and younger that your cited article is calling "dumb".

Mark Bauerlein, in his book, The Dumbest Generation (link is external), reveals how a whole generation of youth are being dumbed down by their aversion to reading anything of substance and their addiction to digital "crap" via social media.

According to the National Endowment for the Arts report in 1982, 82% of college graduates read novels or poems for pleasure; two decades later only 67% did. And more than 40% of Americans under 44 did not read a single book--fiction or nonfiction--over the course of a year.

6 whole scientists that disagree. How cute. And one isn't even a scientist but an expert on science policy. Yes that's valid lol. Read this article. We're dumber as a country than we've ever been.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...g-down-america Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

The fact that you think there are only six scientists who don't subscribe to AGW theory absolutely exposes your ignorance on this issue. You are the poster child for "dumbed down". There are many more scientists both here and abroad who's opinions differ with those views espoused by the alarmists. Since 2010 there's been over 200 papers written by climatologists on the effects of sun spot activity and it's effect on climate alone.
I'm willing to bet that you couldn't names three types of clouds without Google if your life depended on it. I'll save you the trouble. Don't bother, I wouldn't believe you. But by all means, keep posting your ridiculous twaddle. The entertainment value is off the charts.