Another beautiful thing about taint is that taint does not violate icky guidelines in any way. All showcases should have at least two taint photos.
Originally Posted by pyramider
You got that right brother 3sides!!
42,000 porn sites on the Internet, a good half dozen links to other adult sites here, and Blad is mad because this isn't a porn site.
If you wanna good look at the pussy, Blad, you are gonna have to pay these ladies in person to see it. This isn't a jack-off site.
Originally Posted by Glenn Quagmire
Son I have paid more than you ever could. And your statement above seems your trying to be a certain granny hookers bitch boy. She won't give you a freebie or discount so cut the umbilical cord to granny and try being yourself for a change.
But your just not smart enough to have figured out my pointing this out in such an abrupt manner was trying to find out what I will go into below.
you can follow the intent of the guideline, or you can follow Blads interpretation of the guideline. One path is likely to lead to drama and the other is not. Thankfully most of the ladies in Ar. have enough class not to throw their "money-maker" out there in a fashion that that causes problems with this guideline. As to those that would show such pics, Blad will happily use you to further promote this tempest in a teapot, remember, it costs him nothing to goad you into testing the limits he perceives.
Originally Posted by Lazrback
Or better yet
your interpretation to the guideline rule where I pointed out two pictures that broke said rule and you stated the below.
In short no, not even close to the same general rule violation as they don't have their genital area as the main subject of the actual picture, nor is it easily noted,,, we allow as much leniency as possible when it comes to our members,, they are (when found in violation of our guidelines) given ample time to fix the picture, it is only when they don't respond that further measures are warranted.
Originally Posted by Lazrback
So which is it exactly? All we are looking for is a little consistency. Which the two above offered explanations do not offer since they differ so much.
actually they do,,, I don't need to teach you all anything, it is laid out quite clearly in the site guidelines:
#12 - Respect the posted "Image Standards" which apply to our public coed forums. (including Showcase) In short, images which depict subjects which are topless are allowed, but below the waist nudity which displays exposed genitalia or images depicting pornography are to be avoided. Additionally, posting URL links to external sites depicting pornography is not permitted. (use RTM to report images which you feel may not be in compliance)
camel toes are not nude, and show no exposed genitalia so they do indeed "dance" around the intent of the guideline, good call sir. Just a point of order,, paint does not conceal nudity,,, so pics of a lady's bits that are painted, yet nude are still out of order,,, yes, it has been discussed already, lol.
Originally Posted by Lazrback
It seems quite clear yet when I pointed out two reference pictures which indeed are (or were) currently on the site with
exposed genitalia which in short is a violation of said rule #12 your replied to my query with
In short no, not even close to the same general rule violation as they don't have their genital area as the main subject of the actual picture, nor is it easily noted,,, we allow as much leniency as possible when it comes to our members,, they are (when found in violation of our guidelines) given ample time to fix the picture, it is only when they don't respond that further measures are warranted.
Originally Posted by Lazrback
Which leads one to believe as long as it is not the "focused subject matter it is ok. Yet the rule clearly states
but below the waist nudity which displays exposed genitalia or images depicting pornography are to be avoided. Additionally, posting URL links to external sites depicting pornography is not permitted. (use RTM to report images which you feel may not be in compliance)
In short no, not even close to the same general rule violation as they don't have their genital area as the main subject of the actual picture, nor is it easily noted
Originally Posted by Lazrback
Not the "main subject" yet still exposed.. So which exactly is it? Consistency is a great thing to have on a board as it tends to solidify the general comprehension for any given rule.
Blad, you really should just start your own site, as our rules are to restricting for you, you could set your own. Hell, I'd pay to join it, believe me, I would.
Originally Posted by Lazrback
Been there done that. Will never do it again. Too many headaches and I have very limited free time.