Face it, impossible to totally eliminate risks. Originally Posted by RockydocYes, Rocky – you are correct. It is impossible to "eliminate" risk entirely. However...
Hmmm... There are those on here that will try to create an argument out of nearly any situation. Go figure. Lol.
Yes, Rocky – you are correct. It is impossible to "eliminate" risk entirely. However...
I think that nearly everyone would agree that the risks involved with barebacking a SO, even one that occasionally strays, are drastically lower than a hobbyist or a provider that habitually barebacks in the hobby.
It's essentially the same behavior, but the frequency of having interactions with multiple different partners would obviously be greater in the hobby, making the risks involved exponentially greater. Originally Posted by Ginger Doll
Well I believe if there is a hobbiest or two (or a hundred who knows) who is out barebacking then should they not be named along with the ladies they have seen so those of us who like to remain safe can avoid all parties who have been involved with said activities? Originally Posted by bladtinzuThat is the purpose of the Reviews here on Eccie. Additionally, that information can be discussed/documented in the "Private" area available to the Hobbyists. The Providers have a similar area available to them as well.
That is the purpose of the Reviews here on Eccie. Additionally, that information can be discussed/documented in the "Private" area available to the Hobbyists. The Providers have a similar area available to them as well.Actually it was since someone else brought it up (the barebacking by hobbiests). Don't see you berating her publicly for changing the subject.. Makes one go humm now doesn't it?
If you do not feel that the "Private" area available to you is secure enough, you still have the ability to PM your fellow members of a like mind and share that information.
The discussion contained in the quote above should be moved to a new thread or dropped in this one.
It is not germane to the subject of this thread - Broken Condoms
Please stay on topic.
Biomed1 Originally Posted by biomed1
...Plus add to the fact you are not listed as a mod here yet acting in the capacity of one who officially can mod here. Wonder why? Originally Posted by bladtinzuI would be very interested in hearing what exactly that has to do with condoms.
Actually, my point was directly related to "when & if a condom breaks in the hobby," you'd better make sure you're seeing someone who consistently practices safe sex (within the hobby.)
This thread is about condoms breaking on hobby dates. And I would think it's safe to say that discussion of possible risks that ensue when they do break is related and acceptable.
You, Blad (& MaryBeth) are the ones that started the bareback 'with SO's/in serious relationships' argument, not on topic -- because honestly -- how many people even use condoms with their SO??
And then you even took it a step further, talking about outing those that do bareback in the hobby. Which, in essence, I agree with -- but like I told Biomed , that belongs in a different thread entirely. Originally Posted by Ginger Doll
It really grows tiresome, yet I get a warning for some vaguely interpreted drug reference? Really? Originally Posted by Flyboy182+1, completely tiresome. Although, it is good to see you posting again, Flyboy.