For the men. If you could provide, would you? How would you? If you were a woman what kind of hoe would you be?

Did you hear that? Listen closely. That is the almost inaudible sounds of slow moans,seductive synapses firing and panties dropping!

Bravo, DA TYLER!!

Okay, that was supposed to be a response to an above commenter. But, quote button didn't work. Or I didn't press it or something. Never the mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loxly
Since there's not a big market for aged beef I'd have to decline. However I do have some decent ideas for an agency. LOL

Au contraire, mon frere. I think there is a big market, but there is a definitely oversupply of product and so the price is very very low. In fact most young ladies who say "I love older men" expect to be paid to take the product LOL. I have many unsolicited conversations with ladies from 19 to 35 who insist the "aged beef" experience is superior. Now they may be lying to me, but that's my story and I'm sticking to it.

if you were a provider and I was a female hobbyist I would totally see you though admittedly I have alterior motives. to hijack some of your sweaters >: D

I'm kinda weird and I like mens cothes and sometimes I just wanna steal your sweaters all for myself. Originally Posted by Secret_Amore

You are turned on by things tactile (and possibly aroma) that have been in close proximity to the opposite sex? That isn't weird at all.Own it and celebrate it I'd say. Never apologize for how you were made and wired, there is someone or lots and lots and lots of someones for each and every one of us (well, OK, maybe that is a stretch, but I'm trying to be kind here).

I was going to donate all my sweaters to charity along with a bunch of other clothes, but I think I'll box them all up and see if we can't barter

I would provide only for lesbians

By the first kiss. Kissing is an art form in itself. How many providers can really kiss ?? It's all about the lips, the swirling tongue, discreetly probing til the hairs stand out on the back of your neck. You know the score. My arms around you with sensuous inviting eyes piercing into you like lasers. In no time at all as a female provider, my hand would be on your bulging anticipation and in turn as Scarlett describes, my panties would be gone, destination, ankles, moaning and hot wet kisses take over, devouring with passion, as my sultry enticing hips gyrate towards his. He has no option but to return the favor and he's all electric. he can't resist. 'How can you resist when you have a lady provider who gets it?? She has his hot buttons within her eyes and fingers. Her body turns him into uncontrolled jello. His knees would give way at any moment. He can barely breathe.
Before he knows it, he's naked and its wave after wave of raw passion.
I know, as a man, I've been there and my ATF comes to mind. She is the connoisseur of the 4play, and she doesn't even do FS. But she drives me wild and it's non stop. She can't stop and neither can I. And this can go on for hours and it always does.
As a switch, the chemistry you can cut like a knife, like a delicious chocolate cake, loaded with cherries.
It's a rare event but I'm always looking, seeking out the ultimate, because if it's found, there's no going back. The lady will have made an indelible impression on him forever. I would be the ultimate bell weather gal. No competition, sorry but that's the way it would have to be. So why would he settle for second best?
A dying art indeed, but something I would strive for if I was the ultimate provider. Maybe even become legendary, because you are only as good as the last performance. The next time has to be even better. There's no excuses, or reasons to under perform.
Delicious seduction leaving you paralyzed for a few moments, a delightful toe curling experience til normality can resume.
An interesting foray into being a rare gem of a GFE. Ah ha and there would be no half hour sessions here !!!

DA...know what you mean. Been in many extended 4 play sessions it's almost like you forget why you're there in the first place, or maybe it was just that I needed! The following after a heated 4 play however is simply amazing. I'd provide off those merits alone. Aside from that, I have a good body, young (29), and just love women. Good, bad, etc...could probably get into it.

Okay, that was supposed to be a response to an above commenter. But, quote button didn't work. Or I didn't press it or something. Never the mind. Originally Posted by chelseabean

Ah, my mistake. Without the quote, it came across as a general rejoinder to the men in the thread. Thank you for clarifying. It's my perspective that if I'm honestly misunderstood, I bear at least some of the responsibility for poorly communicating. I sincerely appreciate knowing I didn't send the wrong message in the first place.

Ah, my mistake. Without the quote, it came across as a general rejoinder to the men in the thread. Thank you for clarifying. It's my perspective that if I'm honestly misunderstood, I bear at least some of the responsibility for poorly communicating. I sincerely appreciate knowing I didn't send the wrong message in the first place. Originally Posted by Centaur

What? This particular post only referred to my post where I tried to respond to you, but then didn't push "quote", so looked really random. But, then I couldn't delete, so I had to write something.

Are you being snide or sincere? If you're being snide, you're really good at it, insulting someone covertly is a lost art. Are you really a waspy middle-aged woman? For some reason, I keep picturing the mother (Will's) from Will and Grace. I'm not being snide, by the way. I'm no good at it, and I know my limitations. I'm seriously asking, about the snide and sincere. I don't really think you're Blythe Danner.

As far as original quote, was just speaking to a particular double bind which is close to my heart. It just bugs the crap out of me, especially within this arena. Although it certainly doesn't apply to everyone, it does seem to be a bit endemic.

What? This particular post only referred to my post where I tried to respond to you, but then didn't push "quote", so looked really random. But, then I couldn't delete, so I had to write something.

Are you being snide or sincere? If you're being snide, you're really good at it, insulting someone covertly is a lost art. Are you really a waspy middle-aged woman? For some reason, I keep picturing the mother (Will's) from Will and Grace. I'm not being snide, by the way. I'm no good at it, and I know my limitations. I'm seriously asking, about the snide and sincere. I don't really think you're Blythe Danner.

As far as original quote, was just speaking to a particular double bind which is close to my heart. It just bugs the crap out of me, especially within this arena. Although it certainly doesn't apply to everyone, it does seem to be a bit endemic. Originally Posted by chelseabean

I just reread and I didn't use the quote button on the original post either, was a response to the above commenter alone. I totally get why you would be confused. Ahh, that was sincere. I like you. the internets is hard, at least the way I do it. Wasn't a general "rejoinder", but thanks, did you find that to be particularly clever? Interesting word to use.

It would be interesting to be a vagina owner for about 35 days. And yes, I'd totally shave mine and rent it out to make some $$$...

I would establish a well designed and equipped dungeon suitable for erotic photography and video. Perhaps room enough for a dozen seats for voyeurs and participants. Several ancillary rooms for showers, costumes, leather wear, equipment storage, dressing, meditation, etc. I would hire myself out for mild to wild Domination and role play.

Are you being snide or sincere? Originally Posted by chelseabean

Sincere. I don't do subtle on the internet. It never goes according to plan. If I'm snide to someone, I'll try to leave no question as to the intent.

Are you really a waspy middle-aged woman? Originally Posted by chelseabean

Nope. Not a woman. Definitely not a protestant

I totally get why you would be confused. Ahh, that was sincere. Originally Posted by chelseabean

No worries.

Wasn't a general "rejoinder", but thanks, did you find that to be particularly clever? Interesting word to use. Originally Posted by chelseabean

Clever, no. If using a wider than average vocabulary is a form of intelligence, then we must all bow down before our new Oxford-English-Dictionary overlords before it's too late.

Interesting only in the sense that I like to use words the same way like to use ingredients when I cook; variety is the spice of life. When one reads and writes a great deal, it's nice to mix it up. Others may find it precocious. Fortunately for me, that isn't an area in which the opinions of others matter to me.

Moreover, each word has a nuanced meaning apart from its synonyms. I do try not to misuse them, though I'm sure I occasionally fail. Each word that loses common circulation is a loss in nuance.

There seems to have emerged in the last two or three generations an ethic in American culture against a wide vocabulary, in use if not in knowledge. I hypothesize that this is because of the misconception that vocabulary is tantamount to intelligence. It's common sense that using many so-called "big words" is not really a sign of intelligence beyond mere rote memorization, which is hardly a productive skill in any society that has transcended an oral recording tradition. Yet the more one reads, the more words one comes across and has occasion to look up. Add to that many posers who do use a wide vocabulary in the hopes of sounding intelligent and you wind up with a vast distrust of any use of nuanced vocabulary. Which is really unfortunate, IMHO, because while vocabulary is not intelligence, nuanced communication is a key ingredient in efficiently and effectively learning and teaching real problem-solving intelligence. Words are, after all, usually coined to convey a particular meaning and not simply because their minters wanted to sound smart. It's natural that some words will fall out of disuse and others come into existence...so goes the natural evolution of one language into another. But the wholesale shunning of words that seem complex or nuanced is a tragedy.

All that said, I do try to curb my fascination with shiny words by asking whether the use of a particular word really adds a nuance that better conveys the intent behind my words, lest I'm overly verbose for its own sake. For example, because you initial reply to the other replies to the original post in this thread was succinct and witty without being snide, rejoinder was the most apt descriptor I knew of.

I would provide the ultimate BFE. Ladies could schedule a special 4 hour ultimate boy friend experience where they would be nonchalantly greeting at the door by a guy who just woke up, still in his boxers with messy hair.

First I would prepare a healthy gourmet breakfast consisting of runny eggs and microwave bacon then the client would be asked to clean up and do the dishes while I watch the pre game show.

At half time we will adjourn to my messy bedroom at which time I would bang you in up to 4 different positions. Next I would send you to the store for more beer and ignore you during the second half.

I would be very low volume and only book one client a week during the 17 week NFL regular season. Book now ladies to reserve your spot.

I think some misuderstood. My fault. I am asking the men, if they were a woman would they provide? Originally Posted by Scarlett De Rossi

I know the OP was looking for the if you were a woman answer but I'm not a woman and honestly couldn't give that type of perspective which I do not have. This why my post above was from the if I was a male hooker prospective.

Sincere. I don't do subtle on the internet. It never goes according to plan. If I'm snide to someone, I'll try to leave no question as to the intent.
Nope. Not a woman. Definitely not a protestant
No worries.
Clever, no. If using a wider than average vocabulary is a form of intelligence, then we must all bow down before our new Oxford-English-Dictionary overlords before it's too late.

Interesting only in the sense that I like to use words the same way like to use ingredients when I cook; variety is the spice of life. When one reads and writes a great deal, it's nice to mix it up. Others may find it precocious. Fortunately for me, that isn't an area in which the opinions of others matter to me.

Moreover, each word has a nuanced meaning apart from its synonyms. I do try not to misuse them, though I'm sure I occasionally fail. Each word that loses common

.

There seems to have emerged in the last two or three generations an ethic in American culture against a wide vocabulary, in use if not in knowledge. I hypothesize that this is because of the misconception that vocabulary is tantamount to intelligence. It's common sense that using many so-called "big words" is not really a sign of intelligence beyond mere rote memorization, which is hardly a productive skill in any society that has transcended an oral recording tradition. Yet the more one reads, the more words one comes across and has occasion to look up. Add to that many posers who do use a wide vocabulary in the hopes of sounding intelligent and you wind up with a vast distrust of any use of nuanced vocabulary. Which is really unfortunate, IMHO, because while vocabulary is not intelligence, nuanced communication is a key ingredient in efficiently and effectively learning and teaching real problem-solving intelligence. Words are, after all, usually coined to convey a particular meaning and not simply because their minters wanted to sound smart. It's natural that some words will fall out of disuse and others come into existence...so goes the natural evolution of one language into another. But the wholesale shunning of words that seem complex or nuanced is a tragedy.

All that said, I do try to curb my fascination with shiny words by asking whether the use of a particular word really adds a nuance that better conveys the intent behind my words, lest I'm overly verbose for its own sake. For example, because you initial reply to the other replies to the original post in this thread was succinct and witty without being snide, rejoinder was the most apt descriptor I knew of. Originally Posted by Centaur

Exactly. I think we share some of the same thoughts on language. You used that word when you could have used many others. Many words mean a retort, response, etc, but few in that category have the extra added meaning of being clever. the one you used does. I just thought that was what you meant to imply, since that was the word that you used. You chose a very particular word when just any one would do. I think you secretly love me.