RockerRick....no board accountability, emotional outbursts and resorting to personal attacks outside the board...to what end? An imminent threat to the hobby community!

I'm gonna guess Rockerrick is curled up in a corner crying already and to think the party barely got started what a little bitch! I woulda stole your lunch money in school pussy!

I'm gonna guess Rockerrick is curled up in a corner crying already and to think the party barely got started what a little bitch! I woulda stole your lunch money in school pussy! Originally Posted by Hiker78

Paduan you should sleep! The dawns will eat you if you're awake! Twerp

Maybe,,,,,,,

I think he's lonely and needs a hug.....

You have SFK....
I have my SB.....
Slave Guinevere has Still Looking,,,,

Who does Ricky have?

Maybe we need to start a thread and find him a girl friend.....


. Originally Posted by Whispers

To answer your question.....he has Louigi. Louigi has lots of love for RR.....please refer to Exhibit A

Exhibit A (behold....Ricky's alter ego...evening star).....starring in "When Retard meets Retard":
Sourced from http://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=10...post1054933043

Johnny Johnny Johnny I sent you links to post in this very forum by verified providers. For you to claim them to be my handles makes you sound even more retarded than people think you are! You are a complete fucking imbecile, get a life and quit following me around the board, I am not ever going to give into your man crush so........ Fuck off!

Here's the link since your memory sucks shit
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...9&postcount=72 Originally Posted by Evening Star

Rick - get a life Originally Posted by Louigi

Hahaha Louigi, what no post from your imaginary fan club? Originally Posted by Evening Star

My fan club is the star that told you where to get off! Originally Posted by Louigi

I'm guessing your fan club didn't read the ROS of your last review? Cause I know damn well if your fan club read it they wouldn't be your fan club! Originally Posted by Evening Star

Hey, I have nothing to hide! Why do you hide behind continuing new user names? Because you're a coward! Originally Posted by Louigi

My star and I have our punishment session set for Friday, you sack of shit! What are you doing? Originally Posted by Louigi

Oh boy you can pay for sex. How fucking unique of you

Get the mods to turn my handle on and I'll call you a stupid piece of shit with it!
If I post my handle in a post how can I be hiding? You sound about as fucking stupid as JohnnyYanks.
Now if you'd like to rephrase that to I don't give a shit about rules or punishments. I would be inclined to agree. Originally Posted by Evening Star

any man that says he doesn't pay for pussy doesn't look at his AMEX systement! Your stupidity is beyond belief!

Get a life imbecile! Originally Posted by Louigi

Keep telling yourself that here's a clue for you, you're an appointment. And that's only if your ROS doesn't fuck you up. You blemished a spotless record, lol, you are totally clueless to what you've done. Hahahahaha Originally Posted by Evening Star

you know rick, you're not worth fucking with! You're a plight on the planet! Go jack off! Originally Posted by Louigi

Sorry Louigi, looks like you're 0/2 in this thread. Got your ass handed to you by a girl last night, and me tonight.
I'm betting you're gonna wish you never started this up
tonight Originally Posted by Evening Star

You're such a fucking joke! You're a fucking plebeian! Originally Posted by Louigi

Uh oh Evening Star is banned! I wonder what other name you will dream up Rick AKA the provider stalker! Originally Posted by Louigi

This one good enough for you. Have fun jacking off on Friday
Hard to claim stalker with someone you were dating asshole.
Especially when they called me yesterday!
I would screen shot the call records but it would give you a real name. Originally Posted by user friendly

You are a complete joke! The laughing stock of ECCIE! Originally Posted by Louigi

I think you'll will be finding out you are. Originally Posted by user friendly

Right - and do I give a rats ass about what a douche bag like you thinks? Nope - sorry! Originally Posted by Louigi

Oh shit, user friendly is banned now!

What's next Rick? Originally Posted by Louigi

Oh gee so fucking troublesome. Got anymore big stud p4p! Originally Posted by Captor Of Sin

you're so predictable! Like BP pussy! Dumb and clueless! Originally Posted by Louigi

Yep - I'm an appointment! I keep life real - you live in a dream! Originally Posted by Louigi

You are funny as hell! My dream has witnesses asshole so go fuck yourself! Your star will notice where this exchange started. I'd bet that you're in the same boat as I tomorrow. Originally Posted by Captor Of Sin

You're not a monger, just a wannabe lover. Sad! Originally Posted by Louigi

Yes I imagine we will!

Private:
we will see Friday if my $$$$ trumps your sack of shit!

You forget I have no rules Loserigi? Originally Posted by Captor Of Sin

Hahahaha Originally Posted by Captor Of Sin

His posts since his recent return speaks volume. There's a lot of ground to cover, but I feel it necessary to urgently get some initial words out, in light of his recent threats.

I'll be compiling messages and summaries from multiple threads....from the time I noticed the radicalism in his posting style since last year. Meanwhile, I strongly urge everyone not to join his bandwagon..... Originally Posted by Beagle

To what end, Inspector Beagle? If there are issues, rtm them, report them. His comments and actions are already here for all to see and he sure doesn't hide not sure what the intent of this thread was!

To what end, Inspector Beagle? If there are issues, rtm them, report them. His comments and actions are already here for all to see and he sure doesn't hide not sure what the intent of this thread was! Originally Posted by Netx9

You need to research "The Houston Effect".... I was surprised to hear the term myself recently but it appears that San Antonio is being left to the members to moderate for themselves.

Unless you touch a nuclear subject, i.e. kids, drugs, bestiality (old bbws count), outing (it seems OK to out yourselves. per Slave's examples) etc..... there is no moderation occurring.....

So build yourself a list of examples and store them for the day you get slapped to make an appeal with and go to town.....

It appears that any of the below guidelines have been set aside in San Antonio

• #1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences.
• #2 - Derogatory racial remarks are simply unacceptable, period. Disrespect another's ethnic background and you will most certainly regret it.
• #3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.
• #4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.
• #5 - Outing or threats of outing are taken seriously. Membership here is anonymous and for the privacy of our members it will remain that way. That means any effort or attempt to connect a person's real world information to their username on this board will be dealt with swiftly and harshly. This includes real names, employment, medical info, addresses past or present, images, criminal or driving record, etc. We expect everyone who participates here to respect and go to great lengths to protect the anonymity and privacy of one another. Reckless disregard or accidental outing will also be taken very seriously.
• #6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.
• #7 - Threats of violence or physical harm will not be tolerated under any circumstances. There is no place for that on this board.
• #8 - Misuse of our Private Messaging system will result in consequences. You are not to spam members using the PM system. You are not to send invitations to other sites using our PM system. You are not to harass others using our PM system.
• #9 - No form of private communications between members are to be posted in our forums. This includes the contents of emails, PMs, IMs, private chat logs, privately shared images, etc. This is an invasion of another's privacy and will not be allowed.
• #10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.
• #11 - Review "Quacking" , a term which describes openly proclaiming falsehood in reply to a review, will be strongly discouraged by our staff. If you believe a review to be false, use the RTM function to report it to your local staff.
• #12 - Respect the posted "Image Standards" which apply to our public coed forums. (including Showcase) In short, images which depict subjects which are topless are allowed, but below the waist nudity which displays exposed genitalia or images depicting pornography are to be avoided. Additionally, posting URL links to external sites depicting pornography is not permitted. (use RTM to report images which you feel may not be in compliance)
• #13 - In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones. This applies to our review forums, in particular, as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time.
• #14 - Our moderating staff monitors the forums with the goal of keeping threads on track and on topic. Occasionally we may issue specific instructions or direction to a poster and we ask that you respect those instructions and follow them. Disregarding a moderator's written instruction or repeating a violation for which you have been warned will most certainly result in penalty.
• #15 - There is no place in our forums for the general discussion or speculation of illicit drug use. This is to be considered a forbidden topic and mention of it will be removed.
• #16 - Posting about/Speculating about another person's medical condition is strictly forbidden. If a member encounters a medical issue and would like to get feedback from others or share it with the community, this would be allowed, but under no circumstances is a member to discuss or state anything about another member in this regard, unless it is in response to a question posed by that member.
• #17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct.
• #18 - Multiple handles are not permitted, unless in certain circumstances are expressly approved by staff in advance on a case-by-case basis. Action will be taken in cases where staff finds multiple handles are being used for deceptive reasons, to carry out an agenda (promotion or trashing of another), or to return to the board following a previous suspension or ban.
• #19 - Account security is of the utmost importance. You are responsible for your account and only your account. You are not to allow any other individual access to your account unless you have received prior approval from staff. This will be considered on a case-by-case basis, but must be approved prior to releasing access to another party.
• #20 - The men and women of our board each have their respective private areas in which secure content is posted and a greater freedom of expression allowed. Each member is responsible for keeping the information in any of the private secure areas (Men's Lounge, Provider Powder Room, The Rest of the Story, posts which have been tagged as private) 100% restricted to the members who are intended to have access to that material. Revealing ANY content which was posted in one of the men's or women's private sections of the board will result in penalty, up to and including loss of your access to these areas. Full cooperation may result in a less severe penalty, and each violation will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Repeated infractions will impact the severity of punishment.
• #21 - Ladies, please respect our Provider Ad Posting guidelines, posted in each of the Ad posting forums. We welcome you to take advantage of every Advertising forum available, but please ensure you are posting in the right location, and that you are following the appropriate posting frequency...which is currently 1 ad per week in your choice of 5 city forums or subdivisions.
• #22 - ECCIE Staff will go to great lengths to avoid editing, deleting, or censoring our members posts or threads...unless absolutely necessary. Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view. Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action, but the offending post will not be removed from the view of our membership in any but the most extreme cases. Often times you will find directions, footnotes, or other guidance from staff edited INTO posts which draw our attention. These are for the purpose of educating the readers of what is and what is not acceptable as well as informing others about how these issues have been dealt with. Members are encouraged to RTM posts which include rule infractions or objectionable material if it appears that staff has not already becomed involved with the thread or post in particular.
  Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.
• #23 - Each member's signature line is an extension of their ability to express their personality to others online. We offer a relaxed and flexible set of guidelines for our members and staff to follow regarding maintenance of their signature area. In short, you are allowed 15 lines of text, space, and images. You may include colored text or larger font sizes, and you may include images that do not exceed 60 pixels in height. Limit font size to "5." Images or larger-than-default text will be counted as 3 of your 15 lines allowed, so please consider this when constructing your signature area. Additionally, you may include links and other items of contact info, but avoid mentioning specifics regarding acronyms, services, or rates. We also ask that you refrain from including links to or mention of competing websites.
• #24 - Disputed reviews will not be removed by staff unless the request is made by the thread starter. In situations such as this, the proper protocol for addressing a review in question is to post a rebuttal to the review in that city forum's coed discussions area. Staff will be happy to do some basic investigation to confirm the validity of such reviews, however removal will only take place when requested by the thread-starter or in extreme cases where it has been proven false, there is an admission by the reviewer that the review is indeed false, or the reviewer failed to cooperate with staff's efforts to confirm validity. In cases where a reviewer is found to have posted a review of a session which did not take place, or posted blatantly false information within a review, the reviewer will be subject to disciplinary action at the discretion of staff, which could lead to loss of posting privileges. Along those same lines, if the reviewed party is found to be making false or inaccurate claims to staff in an attempt to trigger staff action against a reviewer or the removal of a review, that party will also be subject to consequences, up to or including temporary or permanent loss of account access. These measures exist to preserve the integrity of the information posted in our review forums, and will be taken when these circumstances exist.
• #25 - The Provider Verification process on ECCIE is intended to be a minimally-invasive method to reasonably ensure that a provider who has been enabled to advertise on ECCIE is a legit provider, and not a cash 'n' dash, bait 'n' switch, or other security risk to the community. It is NOT intended to be a guarantee of your safety and it is NOT intended to be a guarantee of good service. All of our members, male or female, are responsible to take steps to protect their own safety when participating in the p4p environment. In any case where a member feels their own safety has been compromised by another member here, please promptly report to staff so swift action can be considered, and taken if necessary.
• #26 - False advertising will not be permitted on ECCIE. If you utilize our forums, Showcase, or other advertising features, we ask that your tactics are straight-forward and accurate. If you choose to use images in your advertising, we require that the subject of the images are in fact you. Cases of alleged "false advertising" whether it be through inaccurate images or with text, should be reported to staff by the members using the RTM function. Investigation and appropriate actions will be taken, which may include removal of the false material and could possibly result in loss of ad-posting privileges.
• #27 - ECCIE policy regarding the discussion of competing websites is intended to exhibit a straight-forward and simple approach. We do not disallow mention of other sites here at ECCIE, however we ask that you limit those discussions to the "Other Hobby Sites" thread located in the Member Suggestions and Feedback forum. This is the area that we have designated as being an appropriate outlet for these types of discussions. Posts of this nature made in other forums throughout the board will be merged into this location. If you find these types of posts in your local forums, please use the RTM function to report them to staff.
• #28 - At any time, you may ask to cancel/disable your account here for any reason, or "guest" your account for security reasons. Please submit your request to the staff and include the reason for the request so we may better assist you. In cases where you are asking for your posts or threads to be removed, you will need to submit a list of URL links to the posts you have specified for removal. We will attempt to assist in these cases, but please understand that this process takes time, and due to the amount of work involved, no timeframe or deadline will be given for completion of this task. Additionally, should you wish to return to the board under a different username at a later date, this must be done only after first making contact with staff and receiving staff blessing. (in some cases, a 90-day grace period will be assessed before issuing a new account) At that point, we will be be happy to assist you with the transition.
• #29 - Verified Providers who use the Showcase feature or advertise in our forums are not entitled to a no-review policy. Should circumstances arise which require or prompt you to request a no-review policy on ECCIE, please understand that enforcement of this policy also results in revoking of your showcase or ad-posting privileges. Ladies who have chosen a no-review policy on ECCIE may still post and create threads in any of the non-advertising forums on the board and will still have access to the girls-only areas of the board.
• #30 - ECCIE does not, in any way, sponsor or represent social events, meet and greets, or similar activities. On occasion, events may be announced here by our members, however, ECCIE is not associated with or responsible for such events. We are not involved with any related aspects, such as guest selection, screening, or hosting. Should members of our volunteer staff choose to participate in such an event, it should be understood that their personal involvement is of their own choice and responsibility, and in no way connected to their duties here on staff. If you are the host of one of these events, we will allow for ONE "announcement" post to inform the membership, which will be immediately locked to prevent further public discussions regarding the event.
• #31 - Often times in the hobby arena, members may display a tendency towards bringing their conflicts with other members to the board. This will be strongly discouraged and swift effort will be made to put it to rest. Additionally, staff will make every effort to stay uninvolved in conflicts and disputes between members off the board except in such cases where the board becomes directly affected.
• #32 - On occasion, we may lose a valuable member of our community as a result of an unexpected accident, natural causes, or other various circumstances. The grieving process when these situations arise is often difficult and ECCIE has established a procedure to follow in such cases to protect the memory and more importantly the anonymity of our deceased member. A brief announcement will be made to inform the membership and honor the deceased member's contributions here without revealing any circumstances that may jeopardize the privacy of any of the parties involved. It will be immediately locked, and no further discussion allowed.
• #33 - We ask that all members who participate here acquaint themselves with these guidelines and familiarize themselves with the location of the RTM button (white triangle with exclamation point, outlined in red) Our staff are not on duty 24/7 and unfortunately are not always readily available to right the ship, put out fires, or address rule violations when they occur. We need to work together, staff and members, to maintain a comfortable atmosphere in the forums. It is vital that you bring inappropriate posts to the attention of staff using the RTM function when it appears that a staff member has not yet become involved. This will greatly help in our mission to provide the ideal environment for our members to interact with one another.

To what end, Inspector Beagle? If there are issues, rtm them, report them. His comments and actions are already here for all to see and he sure doesn't hide not sure what the intent of this thread was! Originally Posted by Netx9

I don't know the extent to which we can trust the mods here to handle situations. We don't know what actions, or if any were taken, behind the scenes. It would be more reassuring if they were a little more expressive on the forums. At least make it known where they stand, based on what they know....

I'm hoping to make this thread a prelude to honest discussions with RR. I'm expecting lots of noise....but am hoping the noise will die down by the time I start the next thread. Have you noticed the noise in every drawn out discussion......the rehashing of statements, the bashing, the tackling of opposing views from different angles? As long as there's conversation.....there's opportunity to gain better understanding......

I don't know the extent to which we can trust the mods here to handle situations. We don't know what actions, or if any were taken, behind the scenes. It would be more reassuring if they were a little more expressive on the forums. At least make it known where they stand, based on what they know....

I'm hoping to make this thread a prelude to honest discussions with RR. I'm expecting lots of noise....but am hoping the noise will die down by the time I start the next thread. Have you noticed the noise in every drawn out discussion......the rehashing of statements, the bashing, the tackling of opposing views from different angles? As long as there's conversation.....there's opportunity to gain better understanding...... Originally Posted by Beagle

Wait.... So you're trying to come to some understanding and accommodation with the Rickster? Have you noticed he marches to the beat of many different drums? I suspect this is an exercise in futility but you're welcome to try. Where's the Beagle expose on whispers' exploits?

Wait.... So you're trying to come to some understanding and accommodation with the Rickster? Have you noticed he marches to the beat of many different drums? I suspect this is an exercise in futility but you're welcome to try. Where's the Beagle expose on whispers' exploits? Originally Posted by Netx9

I've often mentioned that I don't personally condone the means through which W achieves his agendas, but I've usually been able to agree that the end goal is useful in the bigger scheme. He's good at that, and it gets the desired results. I think he plays a necessary role, in this mixed bag of opinions.....just as we need members to speak up against his views......it's what makes a good discussion.....

I can't say the same for the directions Ricky have been taking....they're rather reactionary, short-sighted and often misguided....

A hobbyist starting a thread about another hobbyist
SMFH I've seen it all lmfao really!

I swear Some people have NOTHING TO DO!
First they attack Slave now they attack RR

I've often mentioned that I don't personally condone the means through which W achieves his agendas, but I've usually been able to agree that the end goal is useful in the bigger scheme. He's good at that, and it gets the desired results. I think he plays a necessary role, in this mixed bag of opinions.....just as we need members to speak up against his views......it's what makes a good discussion.....

I can't say the same for the directions Ricky have been taking....they're rather reactionary, short-sighted and often misguided. ... Originally Posted by Beagle

None of which are against the guidelines, enforced or not. My question is still what is the purpose of this thread?

W may have some useful goals but I think it's fair to say that sa coed started going downhill with controversy when W and company descended upon it during their first "mods suck" crusade back in october. There were occasionally skirmishes but the tone and tenor have since changed with all out fire fights. Perhaps a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy on its face, but I think the evidence and history supports it.

... Lest not forget his oft stated other goals... View counts.

I can't speak for the SA mods, but in Austin we are try our best to let the member's moderate themselves. I believe the "Houston Effect" started out in Austin during my first go around as a mod. Some liked it and some didn't. It's nice to see the "Austin Effect" spread.

It will never be a perfect system. Everyone likes to play the Monday morning quarterback when it comes to making board decisions as a mod. I will take less moderation any day over heavy handed moderation.

sixx

None of which are against the guidelines, enforced or not. My question is still what is the purpose of this thread?

I already alluded to it several posts ago. Can't get more specific than that.....do you explain your moves as you're playing chess?

W may have some useful goals but I think it's fair to say that sa coed started going downhill with controversy when W and company descended upon it during their first "mods suck" crusade back in october.

And back then, it was mainly SL, RR, and W. I popped in once in a while, indicating I wasn't sure it was a good idea.
There were occasionally skirmishes but the tone and tenor have since changed with all out fire fights. Perhaps a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy on its face, but I think the evidence and history supports it.

... Lest not forget his oft stated other goals... View counts. Attention is not a bad thing....it shows people are reading, formulating opinions, expressing views......BAM!.....active forum.... Originally Posted by Netx9

.

None of which are against the guidelines, enforced or not. My question is still what is the purpose of this thread? Originally Posted by Netx9

RR is no threat to providers LMFAO

Jealousy and envy is the purpose of this thread

..wait for it .....

Uh... His expressed comments that the site likes view counts for advertising and therefore likes his activity is not a benevolent motive. View counts may be a necessary condition for and active board and exchange of ideas, but they are not sufficient. It's the quality of the content that does and I say there is little of that coming from them.