PT as a term

By the way...I've been in your place...

I left ASPD, because of what I thought was dictatorial practices by the moderators, and started another board...

You can thank Tebow, again, that you didn't experience what real dictatorship by moderators is like...you have it so good here it hurts...

JoKacz, not cool, thats the view from Pistolero's front porch. No outing.

By the way...I've been in your place...

I left ASPD, because of what I thought was dictatorial practices by the moderators, and started another board...

You can thank Tebow, again, that you didn't experience what real dictatorship by moderators is like...you have it so good here it hurts... Originally Posted by Wakeup

You must have been at a different ASPD than I was. I resisted as long as I could (see my join date) the move here. And I helped G.P. try to bring it back to life, before this place bought it out to kill it.

You must have been at a different ASPD than I was. I resisted as long as I could (see my join date) the move here. And I helped G.P. try to bring it back to life, before this place bought it out to kill it. Originally Posted by jokacz

That explains a lot. Every forum was different, and Houston was a hotbed of dissent, not because of the enforcement of published guidelines that everyone agreed to follow when the signed in, but because the mods selectively censored, pointed, and banned people for reasons that had nothing to do with the guidelines.

You saw the guideline when you signed up for an account here. What, may I ask, was unclear about it?

You saw the guideline when you signed up for an account here. What, may I ask, was unclear about it? Originally Posted by Wakeup

Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view.

Here's the problem, for example if a provider is underage and a member warns the community about it, I would say that is permissible and the underage sex topic prohibition would not apply. The same is true for illicit drugs, there is going to be, and has been, circumstances where community safety overrules the illicit drug prohibition. To go back to the original intent theory that the righties are so shot in the ass with, I don't think a dumbass blind reading of the guidelines was intended by the ownership. But, then of course, we would actually have to hear that from the ownership and not from some mods. If that's what they had in mind, then fuck them and drive on. Like I said, this place is near the end of its useful life cycle to me and to many others from both ends of the spectrum of members.

Because the guidelines are enforced selectively. As they should be, and have been regarding P.T. in the past. Until this recent frenzy from the great unwashed in the land of queers and steers. Originally Posted by jokacz

So, your local modtards are in agreement with you.........that explains much about what they don't do for your forums.......they are deliberately assisting you in running your local forums into the ground.........interesting

You must have been at a different ASPD than I was. I resisted as long as I could (see my join date) the move here. And I helped G.P. try to bring it back to life, before this place bought it out to kill it. Originally Posted by jokacz

You don't have a clue what was going on behind the scenes after the fall of ASPD.........I didn't see you at the Taco Bell........unless that scrawny fucker with the dead whores sister was you.

Here's the problem, for example if a provider is underage and a member warns the community about it, I would say that is permissible and the underage sex topic prohibition would not apply. The same is true for illicit drugs, there is going to be, and has been, circumstances where community safety overrules the illicit drug prohibition. To go back to the original intent theory that the righties are so shot in the ass with, I don't think a dumbass blind reading of the guidelines was intended by the ownership. But, then of course, we would actually have to hear that from the ownership and not from some mods. If that's what they had in mind, then fuck them and drive on. Like I said, this place is near the end of its useful life cycle to me and to many others from both ends of the spectrum of members. Originally Posted by jokacz

You are incorrect. Anything you would say could be fabricated........by you.......or someone else. If you need to warn Plastic Man about some underage whore or danger to the community, you can PM him that information.........or better yet, RTM the proof of your concern to modtardville and let the system do what it is designed to do.

Good luck with your new board.

I was going to respond...but DH said it...

There's no excuse...no overriding principle, that trumps the nuclear rule application in public view...none...

And it's way past time it was stamped out...

Just a thought here. If we see a gal who has funny marks on her arms can we put that in the physical description? We put everything else there from MM's to tats and piercings to shaved kitty. Even mention post baby stretch marks. I consider funny marks on the arms as much a part of a gals physical appearance as those other things. Or will that particular thing get edited out.

So, your local modtards are in agreement with you.........that explains much about what they don't do for your forums.......they are deliberately assisting you in running your local forums into the ground.........interesting

And that is as it should be, some would like to run it into the ground, like DD. Others have an open mind.



You don't have a clue what was going on behind the scenes after the fall of ASPD.........I didn't see you at the Taco Bell........unless that scrawny fucker with the dead whores sister was you.


Don't give a flying fuck about behind the scenes, the upstate board worked well enough, with the exception of a bad mod or two.



You are incorrect. Anything you would say could be fabricated........by you.......or someone else. If you need to warn Plastic Man about some underage whore or danger to the community, you can PM him that information.........or better yet, RTM the proof of your concern to modtardville and let the system do what it is designed to do.


Anything anywhere, alerts, reviews, what have you, could be fabricated. That dog just won't hunt, sorry.

Good luck with your new board

LOL

. Originally Posted by dearhunter

_

Cowboy, you cannot discuss drug or medical issues. If you say she had needle marks on her arms, you are in violation of the guidelines. You can say that you have private concerns about the whore and suggest anyone wanting more info to send you a PM.

Jokacz, whether or not your dog can hunt is irrelevant........down in the land of steers and queers we got no use for a dog that don't hunt......ijs

Oh hell, just assist the fucktards earn points and enjoy their time away to work on their Xanadu of a SHMB.

Jokacz, whether or not your dog can hunt is irrelevant........down in the land of steers and queers we got no use for a dog that don't hunt......ijs Originally Posted by dearhunter

It's not my dog, it's yours. And it's name is ECCIE.


This is a public board, so logging in isn't necessary to watch the Titanic sink. Time to start lurking, like some ex-mods, who also don't care to contribute to a farce.

3sides, that is also inappropriate.....Upstate NY deserves modtards who enforce all of the guideline evenly and in the vision of the Owner of this board.......just as jokacz can enforce whatever guidelines he chooses on his board.

Forcing enforcement from afar serves no ones best interest.......and is a course of last resort.