Fraudulent email accounts!

I seen a provider couple months ago, when asking if she would provide me a reference to see LM she warned me to steer very clear of her because she will bring clients down in their rw life. I for one am not interested in meeting her family like the others did. And yes there's proof....



Wasn't Anna or xoxo either.

Oh ya, happy Mother's day ladies Originally Posted by imabout2

Show me proof lol. I would never, no matter what do that in this business... Ijs
You choose to believe who you "think" is your friend. The claws come out when you decide to get out of it... One thing I believe in is: what providers/clients discuss behind close doors, should stay there and never come out. And no, it doesn't mean that I talk about my personal/RW problems with clients, before you try that angle. My reputation will carry me to the end. I'm done talking about any of this. It's just not worth it. There's more to life than to be stuck on this matter. You've said your peace. Even if you come back and try to instigate me, believe me, not worth my time or attention...
And thank you for your Mother's Day wish...

[QUOTE=imabout2;1056705731]I seen a provider couple months ago, when asking if she would provide me a reference to see LM she warned me to steer very clear of her because she will bring clients down in their rw life. I for one am not interested in meeting her family like the others did. And yes there's proof....


Wasn't Anna or xoxo either.

Oh ya, happy Mother's day ladies [QUOTE/]


A provider wouldn't give you a reference to see Moxie and told you to steer clear of her? Why exactly ?...

That's typical behavior of a provider who doesn't want to share there cash flow.

Who has met Moxies family? The provider your referencing? Who is this provider?

Proof of what exactly? 'I'm just asking for clarity.
There are a lot of people saying they have proof yet they never share it.

Just best to avoid the drama and not get caught up in such threads...ijs Originally Posted by SOULMANIKE

After this post, I wash my hands of this. I didn't have anything to do with it in the start other than be sympathetic, Originally Posted by FoxyNC

I am done with this as well Originally Posted by Sexy Katrina

I'm done talking about any of this. It's just not worth it. Originally Posted by LatinaMoxie

looks to me like this is a wrap
correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like this has run it's course.

I have known Latina Moxie since she first showed up. She is actually one of the most stable providers out there--and we have had many long conversations. I don't know the truth/particulars in this case, but I can give only the highest of possible recommendations for LM. I don't have any tolerance for unstable providers anymore--no matter how hot. LM has a normal family life that requires her to mind her P's and Q's. Knowing a little about her schedule/stuff going on in her busy life I can't imagine that creating drama is high on her list.

imabout2 is the new lackey.......sweeeeeeet

imabout2 is the new lackey.......sweeeeeeet Originally Posted by dearhunter

Yeap

looks to me like this is a wrap
correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like this has run it's course. Originally Posted by H.Hardhat

It hasn't run its course, and won't until the people involved find a resolution. Even the mods know that. At least its contained to this thread and not all over the damn board as I've seen in yesteryear.

I seen a provider couple months ago, when asking if she would provide me a reference to see LM she warned me to steer very clear of her because she will bring clients down in their rw life. I for one am not interested in meeting her family like the others did. And yes there's proof....



Wasn't Anna or xoxo either.

Oh ya, happy Mother's day ladies Originally Posted by imabout2

How's this for proof since it WASN'T ANNA?

BTW Nice signature. That way it's easy to see you ARE INDEED #TeamAnna ....

Ok, ok, I'm out.

Damn

I seen a provider couple months ago, when asking if she would provide me a reference to see LM she warned me to steer very clear of her because she will bring clients down in their rw life. I for one am not interested in meeting her family like the others did. And yes there's proof....

Wasn't Anna or xoxo either.

Oh ya, happy Mother's day ladies Originally Posted by imabout2

How's this for proof since it WASN'T ANNA?

BTW Nice signature. That way it's easy to see you ARE INDEED #TeamAnna ....

Ok, ok, I'm out.


Originally Posted by FoxyNC

You should see the ones she sent me... she doesn't know whether she wants to invite me for a drink or hang me in effigy. TFF

looks to me like this is a wrap
correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like this has run it's course. Originally Posted by H.Hardhat

is it Hardhat?

is it really ever over?

haven't they all (not counting the mod) kept posting? ha!

How's this for proof since it WASN'T ANNA?

BTW Nice signature. That way it's easy to see you ARE INDEED #TeamAnna ....

Ok, ok, I'm out.


Originally Posted by FoxyNC

not to take sides or knock anyone specifically but most of you don't really know how the internet works do you?

that's hardly proof. yes, knowing providers limited tech knowledge it probably is correct but that can be edited/faked. I could send you a message and have it give you a return path of foxync @ yahoo.com (and make sure it didn't come from a gmail domain without going into details. I broke the address up to break the hotlink since this board is jacked! ha, ha!)

just saying when it comes to the net, things you see are much different than etched in stone.

^^ I'd post everything I've gotten but there's a rule for that^^^ ijs. (-:
HV , yeah I know she's sent me some saying I called to apologize lol. I never did. And what is it that I should apologize for specifically? I mean, come on dude! Seriously? Like for real? Like OMGEE! Lmao!!!

^^ I'd post everything I've gotten but there's a rule for that^^^ ijs. (-:
HV , yeah I know she's sent me some saying I called to apologize lol. I never did. And what is it that I should apologize for specifically? I mean, come on dude! Seriously? Like for real? Like OMGEE! Lmao!!! Originally Posted by LatinaMoxie

oh, I don't doubt it.

my point is that headers aren't the best example. they are relatively easily manipulated. one reason to do such a thing being a post exactly like that.

Yes. True. But I can vouch for her and assure you that email is absolutely true. (-:

not to take sides or knock anyone specifically but most of you don't really know how the internet works do you?

that's hardly proof. yes, knowing providers limited tech knowledge it probably is correct but that can be edited/faked. I could send you a message and have it give you a return path of foxync @ yahoo.com (and make sure it didn't come from a gmail domain without going into details. I broke the address up to break the hotlink since this board is jacked! ha, ha!)

just saying when it comes to the net, things you see are much different than etched in stone. Originally Posted by JustMeCLTXGG

My knowledge of all IT stuff is limited compared to an expert, yes, but it is far beyond that of your average noob.
What I do lack in formal training in IT, I do however possess something most providers do not, which is a Technical Troubleshooting certificate.


So illuminate me, please,

hypothetically.... (since this is actually very close to & on topic here):

if janedoe123@whateveremail . com emails me (from an allegedly spoofed email)

and I send her a reply... by composing a new mail...
typing in her email address manually ....
ya know.. just to make sure that nothing "funny with coding is going on" and make sure to check a quick glimpse through html formatting.... ya know... just to check...
And let's say this same BSC janedoe123 @ whatevermail . com
then sends me back a response regarding my first response....
(responding right where she left off from the first alleged spoof mail, heh.)

Is janedoe123 @ whateveremail . com 's 2nd email then spoofed? Or do I have a complete circuit? I think the response would pretty much solidify proof against /alleviate any spoofing concerns without the use of any techie stuff. More like deductive reasoning, Watson....

Y'all follow what I am saying?....

At any rate, I find it disconcerting the back & forth (drama) but what is done in the dark, will come to the light.

Thankyou for at least trying to enlighten us.

I know I appreciate it.
If it wouldn't teach some of these tards how to spoof, I'd ask you to explain it, but I'll let the dumb ones fend for themselves.
They seem to be doing just fine with the shovels they've got.



Foxy

You should see the ones she sent me... she doesn't know whether she wants to invite me for a drink or hang me in effigy. TFF Originally Posted by Hottentot Venus

Why did I hear Will Smith clearing his sinuses in my head when I saw that? LOL I must have that reel stored away in my head....
Yes, sorry, I TOO am allergic to bullshit...

I got my one response, and that's all *I* needed.

I reckon I need to put my head back down now, that way they can go back to sleep on me....