The Time Has Come For The $150 Review Discount

What Fancy said there^^^
Plus, when the lady knows she its going to be reviewed she may give an outstanding performance which may or may not be a typical hobby experience. A YMMV thing. Of course all reviews are based on opinion and preferences, I've been lucky to find partners that I've clicked with and had a fantastic time with, with the exception of one. Call it luck of the draw.
But discounts for reviews should be used as a marketing tool to boost a ladies business. If things are doing good for the lass, then she has no need to discount what apparently is already working for her.
kinkyorca's Avatar
Do a punch card like subway. After 5 visits the 6th one comes with a free sandwich.. lol
SweetDulce's Avatar
That's why I hate when that happens with the quotes. I didn't say that. You mean less than 100 providers, or their rate is less than 100?

You do know that there are a bunch of providers that have a no review policy, correct? That just means that they can't advertise here, but there are several.



Hey! I resemble that remark Originally Posted by Hottentot Venus
No! Not for Providers. Anything we do , say, or are talked about is free advertising. We have good reasons to post a lot.. xoxo
SamHouston's Avatar
i echo citizen...it takes lot of time to review and risk too..i could hardly do 10 reviews after visiting around 50 of them...average rate always remains $$ but not the same service...so bad..
Same here. I have plenty.

If a gentleman wants to review me after a session, that's lovely, and occasionally even well-established providers need to be reviewed to make sure they are still staying true to quality. However, if a fellow doesn't want to take the time to type one out, or isn't into the "kiss & tell" aspect, that's fine and dandy, too.
Subverts the purpose for longtime reputable companions to offer review discounts. (See below.)

Three problems with the OP's plan:
1. How can you be certain that the poster's positive comments weren't "bought" with that discount?
2. I understand the strategy of new providers offering discounts for reviews, but it's a risky proposition. I know MANY unseasoned lassies who have been taken advantage of when they discounted sessions. The guys never posted subsequent reviews, so essentially these ladies had portions of their donations "stolen" as the fellows didn't live up to their parts of the deals.
3. T
he original intent of reviews has been perverted. Sure, it's nice free advertising for a provider if she merits a "Yes" vote, but that is NOT their primary function. Reviews are "Consumer Reports" telling you gentlemen who is and isn't worth the money, who lives up to their hype and promotion, who is willing to do what for how much, how difficult screening was, if the lady showed up on time and reasonably matched her pics, etc., etc. They are written by gents to inform other gents, and are NOT supposed to be PR on behalf of providers. Seems to me that we now circle back to reason #1, where perception gets muddied.

Rate discounts for reviews are just not a good idea if you want unbiased objectivity.

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels


Excatly. I have plenty.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
The discount depends on the provider. Then after some reviews, the market should work itself out. Remember when L Mayfair started? $$.50 was a discount IMHO. Now she's a HDH. Pretty sure she is comfortable now.

IJS that there should not be a standard discount rate across the board, so to speak. Let the provider have the "balls" to either offer a discount or not. Then the clients exchange the information via reviews, albeit personal experiences, and as the services become consistent the rate would or should be set.
Excatly. I have plenty. Originally Posted by Kammye
I don't have any.. and I'm okay with that.
Russ38's Avatar
Excatly. I have plenty. Originally Posted by Kammye
And Kamm has that Superclit where you just can't help but.....

JustMeCLTXGG's Avatar
.............................. .............

Three problems with the OP's plan:
1. How can you be certain that the poster's positive comments weren't "bought" with that discount?.............................. .............................. ..
Rate discounts for reviews are just not a good idea if you want unbiased objectivity.

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels
while I don't disagree with your points. if you could read the whole reviews. I can't say I've come across this much if at all. sure, I don't read ALL reviews. more often when a review is suspected to be "fluffly" it's called out and usually the suspected reason is something else.

also, it isn't stated review special (for good review. well soo far I haven't seen that.) and I've read plenty of reviews which stated the reviewer got a special and the review wasn't glowing or fluffy.

all that said, myself, the times I've partaken in review specials I've never even had the girl bring up anything about a review. I have been asked if I enjoyed a session and then asked to do a review when it wasn't a review special. just posting an example of how it's come up completely the opposite of 1. up there. maybe I just need more test subjects! ha, ha. errr, a bigger focus group.
Do a punch card like subway. After 5 visits the 6th one comes with a free sushi.. lol Originally Posted by kinkyorca
Fixed
And Kamm has that Superclit where you just can't help but.....

Originally Posted by Russ38
You made me spit out my Dr. P
dearhunter's Avatar
Some whore should start a 'freebie friday' trend...........ijs
citizen44's Avatar

1. How can you be certain that the poster's positive comments weren't "bought" with that discount?
Originally Posted by Fancyinheels
This already goes on and is a big problem. WK'ing and over the top dishonest reviews happen because those guys are getting under the table discounts. You see all the time guys stating "thanks for the honest review" when the reviewer points out the real life looks and service that we all know is the norm.

Getting a discount for the time and value that a review holds does not mean the guy is selling his integrity, he can still give her a no if the appointment warrants. If the lady is giving a review special, knows he is going to post a review, and doesn't give it 110%, what is there to say?

2. I understand the strategy of new providers offering discounts for reviews, but it's a risky proposition. I know MANY unseasoned lassies who have been taken advantage of when they discounted sessions. The guys never posted subsequent reviews, so essentially these ladies had portions of their donations "stolen" as the fellows didn't live up to their parts of the deals. Originally Posted by Fancyinheels
This is a pretty shitty thing for a guy to do and you all should use all the means at your disposal to black ball him with other providers. We suffer effectively the same thing far more often by paying for MSOG hour appointments and getting zero effort and IOP on the second round. Effectively stealing half the rate.

3. The original intent of reviews has been perverted. Sure, it's nice free advertising for a provider if she merits a "Yes" vote, but that is NOT their primary function. Reviews are "Consumer Reports" telling you gentlemen who is and isn't worth the money, who lives up to their hype and promotion, who is willing to do what for how much, how difficult screening was, if the lady showed up on time and reasonably matched her pics, etc., etc. They are written by gents to inform other gents, and are NOT supposed to be PR on behalf of providers. Seems to me that we now circle back to reason #1, where perception gets muddied.
Originally Posted by Fancyinheels
While this is correct, it can not be denied the positive effect good reviews have on business. The more frequently you are at the top of the indie review section, the more business you will generate. You can view the review discount as a necessary advertising expense just like any other type of business.

Remember, we are not talking about a discount on every session. The provider controls when and how often she offers review discounts. I'm just saying that if a lady wants a guy to spend an hour of his time to provide her with a financial benefit, she needs to compensate him for what his time is worth and not at some cheap $25 off level. After providers have jumped their rates 20-50% in the last six months, they shouldn't expect any sympathy from us If they don't like how much we expect to be compensated for our time.
kinkyorca's Avatar
Just happy they dont asks me to put a bag over my head. Ijs
JustMeCLTXGG's Avatar
Some whore should start a 'freebie friday' trend...........ijs Originally Posted by dearhunter
ha, ha! that's the dream! one of em anyways.

This already goes on and is a big problem. WK'ing and over the top dishonest reviews happen because those guys are getting under the table discounts. You see all the time guys stating "thanks for the honest review" when the reviewer points out the real life looks and service that we all know is the norm.

Getting a discount for the time and value that a review holds does not mean the guy is selling his integrity, he can still give her a no if the appointment warrants. If the lady is giving a review special, knows he is going to post a review, and doesn't give it 110%, what is there to say? Originally Posted by citizen44
a lot of the suspected WK'ing reviews I've read are usually suspect if they've even taken place at all and some suspected of other things going on. good point though. perhaps some of them actually do take place but they general have some obvious traits and/or patterns.

I'm just saying that if a lady wants a guy to spend an hour of his time.......................... .............................. .............................. Originally Posted by citizen44
one of those traits being some spend about 5-10 minutes if that pecking out some 'wtf(rak) did I just read crap'. ha, ha!