Traveling Gentleman is............

... that doesn't deem them worthy of a response... Originally Posted by SweetDulce

I think we finally agree on something! That's why I didn't go nuclear. Not worth it.

Grouphug! Stay classy.

Well now you know TG is the real deal, he didn't fall into
any of the redundantly overplayed traps, even though he is new.

The same traps many who have been on here for several years
still fall into.

bah. skimmed the thread. damn got a couple of pages quick.

if FoxyNC or however the name is spelled didn't get a slap/ban for her women's area post TG shouldn't get one either.

seems the 100% and Revealing ANY content wording is for using when discretion strikes

She's overweight. The pod is gathering. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Im not overweight all them doughnuts you digest I bet your speaking of yourself.

I think we finally agree on something! That's why I didn't go nuclear. Not worth it.

Grouphug! Stay classy. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

I give credit where credit is do. GROUPHUG. thats funny

E

Another post whore who likes em big... O well we all have to have something to do...carry on

Dammit TG, I was waiting patiently for you to go all nuclear. Disappointed, but probably better to stay above the fray.

Something about TG makes me skeptical. He talks like he's an expert in a lot of things. Has stories that we can't match (gambling in a private room, renting out a whole restaurant for a date). Can't do "normal" screening.

He sounds like money, yet he's here. If I was money, I wouldn't be here. Too many land sharks out there cruising for easy money to have to deal with any of the riff raff.

There's something not right with this one....

Something about TG makes me skeptical. He talks like he's an expert in a lot of things. Has stories that we can't match (gambling in a private room, renting out a whole restaurant for a date). Can't do "normal" screening.

He sounds like money, yet he's here. If I was money, I wouldn't be here. Too many land sharks out there cruising for easy money to have to deal with any of the riff raff.

There's something not right with this one.... Originally Posted by idiot savant

It is a little weird

......

There's a gulf of difference between acknowledging the existence of something, and disclosing the minute contents of it. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

That's not true.

Edit: mentioning existence of private content violates site terms.

TG: You know what, I'm a gentleman. Here, have some money.

Fancy: Of course, you are a gentleman.

TG: Thank you.

Fancy: You are welcome. Originally Posted by Sarunga

Excellent transactional analysis, Sarunga.

Wouldnt know what do with himseif he got banned
When newbies pend more time making threads and arguing than Hobbying,there's an underlying issue there
I say leave him be

Good to know, but I haven't repeated anything from the men's lounge -

There's a gulf of difference between acknowledging the existence of something, and disclosing the minute contents of it. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

In this case that's a distinction without a difference.

Merely publicly acknowledging the existence of something in a private area qualifies as revealing private content. The penalty assessed may vary depending upon the scale of the leak but the guideline is clear.

When in doubt, put it in private tags.

Eccie Forum Guidelines
#20 - The men and women of our board each have their respective private areas in which secure content is posted and a greater freedom of expression allowed. Each member is responsible for keeping the information in any of the private secure areas (Men's Lounge, Provider Powder Room, The Rest of the Story, posts which have been tagged as private) 100% restricted to the members who are intended to have access to that material. Revealing ANY content which was posted in one of the men's or women's private sections of the board will result in penalty, up to and including loss of your access to these areas. Full cooperation may result in a less severe penalty, and each violation will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Repeated infractions will impact the severity of punishment.

if FoxyNC or however the name is spelled didn't get a slap/ban for her women's area post TG shouldn't get one either.

seems the 100% and Revealing ANY content wording is for using when discretion strikes Originally Posted by JustMeCLTXGG

RTM it or Pm me the link, ANY content means just that.

That's not true.

Edit: mentioning existence of private content violates site terms. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

^ this guy gets it...

Something about TG makes me skeptical. He talks like he's an expert in a lot of things. Has stories that we can't match (gambling in a private room, renting out a whole restaurant for a date). Can't do "normal" screening.

He sounds like money, yet he's here. If I was money, I wouldn't be here. Too many land sharks out there cruising for easy money to have to deal with any of the riff raff.

There's something not right with this one.... Originally Posted by idiot savant

Consider:

I gamble in PRIVACY.
My date with Fancy was in PRIVATE.
My screening was intensive, thorough - maybe the most thorough and intensive screening in the history of the hobby....but completely PRIVATE.
When I go out, I prefer PRIVACY.

You won't find me in a bar unless it's empty, save whomever I brought with me. I despise loud gatherings, loud and obnoxious people, and invasions of my PRIVACY.

See any trend that makes sense?