Ex Obama advisors say that Iran deal is a scam and Obama is being played

Please link to it and explain it to us, LittleEva. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

The point is you shit on it without knowing anything about it. You shit on it because of who is president. You're no better than IB and the rest of the eccie reacharound crew.

Here's your buddy Ron Paul, praising the Iran deal. Still like the guy?>
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/ron-.../14/id/657071/

Not to mention he's a racist asshole. You ok with this kind of stuff? You called Margaret Sanger a hitler-level monster for much the same sentiments. And yet, you're so proud of Ron Paul, you put a quote of his in your signature. Not to mention his crazy ideas about AIDS, gays, etc.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...etters/250338/

More of his racist past. Did he disavow it as he claims? Nope. Public record doesn't show that to be the truth. He stood behind them. So I guess he was for them, before he was against them, right? Why does that sound so familiar? Hmmmmm

Because he's a flip-flopping piece of shit.

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/20...t-newsletters/

You must have read it, little eva, since you refer to it as a "so-called" agreement. Why don't you enlighten us by explaining the basis of your skepticism? Originally Posted by lustylad

God you are stupid, have you read it or not lusty lady?

It was a fair question. Obama's answer was inadequate. He's taking a victory lap for negotiating an agreement that gives Iran whatever they want. And they get to keep the hostages as insurance that we don't try back out. Smartest President ever? Bullshit. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy;10569548a67

You must have read it to make a statement like that dull knife, right?

Please link to it and explain it to us, LittleEva. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Showing once again how one line comments confuse you dull knife. No link required it was a yes or no statement...

It wasn't a fair question. It was a disingenuous question. Of course he's not happy that there are still hostages there. And then you go on to outright lie. It doesn't give Iran whatever they want. Their facilities will be under 24/7 surveillance. If they're so sneaky and dishonest that they're willing to subvert any deal and attempt to create a new facility, then how would anyone have had success negotiating with them? Should we not try, though? You're speaking out of fear and ignorance. You try and present this different front. A more libertarian front, but you're just the same as everyone else. The only difference is you're too much of a fucking chickenshit to admit it. Originally Posted by WombRaider

And YOU sure know about chicken shit and how to act like one woomby !! Ignoring me won't make me stop ripping you a new one, ya lying liberal swishy walker !

Why is Nazi Baby Killer attacking Ron Paul like that? Something that Paul did? Doesn't bother me at all, Paul is not and has never been my guy. What a maroon....

Why is Nazi Baby Killer attacking Ron Paul like that? Something that Paul did? Doesn't bother me at all, Paul is not and has never been my guy. What a maroon.... Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You illustrate, yet again, that you are dumber than a box of hammers. That was for cog, if you had a brain, you might have figured that out.

Why is Nazi Baby Killer attacking Ron Paul like that? Something that Paul did? Doesn't bother me at all, Paul is not and has never been my guy. What a maroon.... Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Nazi Baby Killer? Gripping kinda hard, aren't you JDrunk!

Why are you attacking Ron Paul?

Why are you attacking Ron Paul? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Read the links or any of the posts. Goddamn. I knew you were dumb, but motherfucker, you're taking the cake.

He's praising the Iran deal because it essentially leaves Iran alone, which I think is a good idea. I don't like that the hostages were left out. But it's a step in the right direction. Iran is no threat. I've said before. My opposition to the agreement is that Obama is lying about what it means. Also, Paul is not a racist. He was not involved in that newsletter. That was debunked years ago.

He's praising the Iran deal because it essentially leaves Iran alone, which I think is a good idea. I don't like that the hostages were left out. But it's a step in the right direction. Iran is no threat. I've said before. My opposition to the agreement is that Obama is lying about what it means. Also, Paul is not a racist. He was not involved in that newsletter. That was debunked years ago. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

If he wasn't involved, why not not disavow it completely? And how is 24/7 surveillance of their facilities somehow construed as leaving them alone?

Iran is no threat. I've said before. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

The Israelis disagree.
The Saudis disagree.
The Gulf Arabs disagree.
Over 100,000 Syrians slaughtered by the Iranian puppet Assad disagree.
The victims of the terrorist bombings in Argentina, Bulgaria, Lebanon and numerous other countries disagree.

Iran supplies tens of thousands of rockets to Hezbollah which are used to rain destruction on Israel. What happens if one of them has a nuclear warhead someday?

"Death to America!"
"Death to Israel!"

No threat, my ass.