weapons in sessions

......
I carry, responsibly...99% of licensees do not...they're cowboys...more likely to injure themselves or others rather than the perpetrator... Originally Posted by Wakeup

^^^^^^ 100% wakeup right there.

I keep any weapons concealed as not to frighten.

I don't carry a concealed weapon when I'm committing a crime...

I carry, responsibly...99% of licensees do not...they're cowboys...more likely to injure themselves or others rather than the perpetrator... Originally Posted by Wakeup

Most Licensees feel the same. Personally, I'd prefer everyone carry a gun, and let Darwin go to work. In a crowded theater, if someone is going to start unloading and killing dozens of movie-goers, I'd prefer people shoot back at them instead of waiting 15-20 minutes for police to arrive.

And the point of a CCL or MAD isn't to get more bullets down range - it's a deterrent. Which two American cities top the list of gun control? Which two American cities top the list of gun violence? The answer is the same to both. Chicago and Washington D.C.

Citizens carrying isn't meant to encourage gun-fights in the street. Rather, it discourages criminal behavior on other people - because no one ever knows when someone you're assaulting / robbing / raping is going to shoot you in the face.

Final note: Gun control laws are only effective on law-abiding citizens. You can never take away a criminal's guns.

Final, final note: I totally thought this thread was going to be about dicks. Weapons in sessions. I unholster my dick from my sock, perform a flawless mushroom stamp, and re-holster it. Armed and dangerous.

Most Licensees feel the same. Personally, I'd prefer everyone carry a gun, and let Darwin go to work. In a crowded theater, if someone is going to start unloading and killing dozens of movie-goers, I'd prefer people shoot back at them instead of waiting 15-20 minutes for police to arrive. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

Heh...awesome...

Thanks for illustrating my point.

Heh...awesome...

Thanks for illustrating my point. Originally Posted by Wakeup

I would ask you to look at actual statistics of gun control and gun crime. Ignore anecdotal evidence or personal feelings.

Thanks for the advice. My disagreeing with you somehow makes you assume I haven't done that, I assume? Your "give everyone a gun and let Darwin go to work" comment is based in the statistics of gun control and gun crime?

P.S.-You know when they last did that? The late 1800's. Know when there were a lot of cowboys? The late 1800's. Again...thanks for illustrating my point...perfectly...

Thanks for the advice. My disagreeing with you somehow makes you assume I haven't done that, I assume? Your "give everyone a gun and let Darwin go to work" comment is based in the statistics of gun control and gun crime? Originally Posted by Wakeup

My language was loose, the logic is not. Either you've done the research and are ignoring the results, or haven't done the research and are unaware of the results. I assumed the latter (ignorance), and you protest the former (selective argumentation).

In the United States, no matter how you spin it:
More gun control, fewer legal guns, more gun violence. Fact.
Less gun control, more legal guns, less gun violence. Fact.

Not sure what there is to argue about. You advocate for fewer guns. My point is that fewer guns only takes them away from people who don't use them to perpetrate crime. That's not an opinion.

I don't care what you personally believe, just like you shouldn't care what I personally believe. Personally, I think that we should clean out the jails, execute rapists, thieves, and most everyone else, chemically castrate those who intentionally reproduce without the means to support their progency, impeach and criminally try most of our government officials, and a myriad of other things that have nothing to do with what a google search can tell you about the relationship between gun control lobbying and laws, guns, and gun violence.

In the United States, no matter how you spin it:
More gun control, fewer legal guns, more gun violence. Fact.
Less gun control, more legal guns, less gun violence. Fact. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

Hahahahahahahahahahaha

Being armed while committing a crime (seeing a prostitute)
Yeah, probably not a good idea, if you get arrested could possibly
make it a felony crime (I'm not sure about that)

You could possibly lose your rights to any gun ownership.

Also a good screening tool would be not seeing someone
when you think there is a possibility that you may need to be armed LOL

If a fucktard feels the need to be carrying a gun to see a lady then the fucktard really should re-evaluate his hooktard search criteria.

You could possibly lose your rights to any gun ownership. Originally Posted by bojulay

If it's a felony you can DEFINITELY lose your rights. And I'm not 100% sure but it may apply to misdemeanors too.

Yes, I would walk out. I mean a pocket knife is okay as long as it is not in front of me. I don't have anything against guns, but I would want one around me when I am having a session. However, I can understand someone having one out if they were seeing someone who was off BP because of the risk that provider might be linked to a pimp. I really don't know, but I do know if it was me I wouldn't stay.

Does original equipment count as a weapon?

A lot of providers and hobbyist carry so what else is new?