WTF, does that mean you think I am? lol Originally Posted by discreetgentIt means I thought you were.
Damn, and all this time I thought I was perfect. Originally Posted by discreetgent
DG, you mean to tell us you aren't?
Coulda fooled me Originally Posted by WTF
WTF, does that mean you think I am? lol Originally Posted by discreetgent
It means I thought you were. Originally Posted by WTF
lol Originally Posted by discreetgentSomehow "Get a room" seemed appropriate here.
HaluaLuYa! Thank God someone can see the light!you are right as usual. oh and i have plenty of shortcomings. i tend to be aggressive and absolutely incapable of diplomacy . And incapable of small talk. I think we all "bash" something or something or "lash out" on someone. Also those people with the habit of being addicted to "harmony". I know people who craft words beautifully and are very well spoken and articulate, extremely diplomatic, and still - the content of what they "really" say is very offensive and not very well thought of.
I should point out that we all do it, not just Lauren, it is human nature. Not trying to pick on Lauren. The problem is made worse by not acknowledging there is a problem. Looking for your own shortcomings and not others is not easy, especially on a message board. We are like animals puffing ourselves up to detract predators and attract mates. A big charade. Nobody wants to admit their shortcomings but the fact is that the smartest among us is woefully deficient in some field or other. Originally Posted by WTF
I think that both Lauren's and CT's articles speak the truth. They both give fresh perspectives on relationships that relationships in the past didn't have. Some of our parents or our grandparents married in a time when finding your own identity was not the norm, let alone finding your identity in a relationship. It was cookie-cutter. He was the breadwinner, she was the home maker.Loved that post!! and agree wholeheartedly from my perspective
With CT's article, it helps people think before just marrying the wrong person. True, you can't choose who (or how many) you fall in love with. But you can put into perspective the reason you do love. People tend to cling to the 'first thing smokin'', for fear of the lack of future opportunities for love, or there's physical chemistry. We see the signs that things won't work. Emotionally insecure. Intellectually unequal. Financially dependent. They make you feel tired just thinking about them, but you "love" them. Or whatever that means. You stay to try to "change" them or hope they will see your good and mimic it, but they never do, because you're an enabler.
Originally Posted by Tiffani Jameson
The majority of what I have read has been included in a grander scheme of work about sexual culture throughout the ages, specifically in the chapters referring to early religion. Sacred Sex is also an aspect of paganism.
Do you have any recommendations on sacred prostitution? Originally Posted by ninasastri
thanks Darling!
Androgynous Deities, Sex Worship, and Sacred Prostitution
by Hargrave Jennings
The Sacred Prostitute: Eternal Aspect of the Feminine (Studies in Jungian Psychology By Jungian Analysts, Vol 32)
by Nancy Qualls-Corbett and Marion Woodman Originally Posted by Lauren Summerhill