Obvious Fakes!

http://kc.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/5794730

Experience the best of both worlds!!!
Older & Bolder Hot! Jane 40 yrs old, 36ddd- 26-36 tan & oh so sexy.
Sweet and Sinsual eye candy! Brittany 34-b-22-32. 20 yrs old
We love to play with discreet gentlemen who prefer the finer things.
Call anytime
816-612-2086
Poster's age: 40 Originally Posted by thorough9
that was is for sure fake cause nevaeh aka angel was using that one and it wasn't even her either lol actually only one out of 4 of her pics were her..SMH oh well
But we don't have common sense I guess because after three pages of back and forth, I decided to add my two cents to the train wreck, to go along with the other ladies who have spoken up. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh
And after this admission, both of your inability to STFU and your true intentions, which is only to "go along with the other ladies", everything that you say afterwards is basically........BS, grandstanding, and "Protective Older Sibling" syndrone.
Thorough9, in your fantasy world, what 'service' do you imagine you are providing to your fellow hobbyists? Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh
One thing that you'll have to try and wrap your head around, is that all of the world's services, do not begin and end with currency exchange, semen removal, and you on your back. I know that i'm not sucking anybody's dick or anything, so if that disqualifies me in your book, oh well....
Oh, and in my fantasy world, all providers are young and beautiful......

Are you saving them from wasting their money on fakes? Don't the men who show up and see its not the girl in the pic have the option to walk away? Does some sort of sci-fi vacuum device appear out of thin air, which proceeds to suck their wallet dry? This very day, someone posted a review, or rather pseudo-review that said the girl he saw did not remotely resemble the girl in the pics, and he walked away. Apparently, your assistance was unnecessary to save him some hard earned cash. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh
Again, for the dislexic people who can't read, if this poster of the pseudo review had been perusing on his phone, for instance, come across a BP ad that he found appealing, had gone to the ECCIE site and did a search of the provider's name and phone number, and found doubts about the provider's pictures' authenticity, he may have considered another option and in doing so saved himself gas, time, money, and disappointment.

If a man is too stupid to walk away, do you really think he deserves to be spared, or even that you can spare him?
even after they show up to find an ogre rather than the hot little 20-something they were expecting. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh
I'm sure that you know a thing or two about stupid men and this statement may provide some inkling as to how you even continue to function as a provider....
You said it, I didn't.....

WHen you are proven wrong, as has already happened, you just insult those who speak up, accusing them of either kissing ass, or being offensive for the sake of being offensive. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh
PROVE ME WRONG?!? Where have I been proven wrong, and by whom? A bunch of ladies spilling out of the Powder Room like ants, falling and flailing about, raising an alarm, clucking and and dropping shit everywhere like chickens and pigeons, and acting as if they're all agitated because of one picture. AND IF I'M SO WRONG, WHERE IS THE PICTURE THAT BAMBI HAS THAT'S GOING TO PROVE ME WRONG? Bambi, who has been unusually quiet about the whole issue, has yet to produce the entire photograph, that includes her face, that she took "in Chicago". SHOW ME THE PICTURE AND SHUT ME UP!!!!!!!!

Lastly, having looked at your review history, I thought I would offer one last nugget that might be worth pondering. I notice you seem to have an unusually high rate of failure. Over half of your reviews result in "NO" recommendations. Have you considered the (yes, I know very VERY remote) possibility that the real problem here is you? Have you considered the possibility that your methods for selecting a lady are perhaps (dare I say it) flawed, and as a result lead to a high failure rate? Just something for you to mull over. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh
Lastly, my review history says alot of things. It says that I use Backpage, so i know what it's like to walk in and see that the person does not match the picture. My review history says that I take chances. My review history says,"Hey Fellas, I tried this one and it totally sucked ass" (but not in the way that you understand). My reviews say what reviews are supposed to say: YES or NO. My review history says alot of things, but the thing that I am most proud of my review history NOT saying, Ms. Val Balbricker, is: Stacy, SinsOfThe Flesh!
Wow, I'm surprised that the MOD's let you get away with this.

I honestly believe that you hate women.

Sins has nothing but respect from people on this board and you're going to throw around the same tired ass insults you hurled at me a while back....about age, looks, blah blah blah.

I can't believe any woman who is sane and on this board would ever see you.
Thread locked, with one parting note from the forum guidelines:

#31 - Often times in the hobby arena, members may display a tendency towards bringing their conflicts with other members to the board. This will be strongly discouraged and swift effort will be made to put it to rest. Additionally, staff will make every effort to stay uninvolved in conflicts and disputes between members off the board except in such cases where the board becomes directly affected.