I've posted links retard Lenny that shows a vote for Johnson is giving Trump a 1% bump retarded Lenny. Google it retarded Lenny instead of googling retarded pictures Lenny. Educate yourself. You can do it!!!!!!!!! Originally Posted by bambinoEducate yourself ( LOL ) baby bimbo.
Educate yourself ( LOL ) baby bimbo.So you're agreeing with me? Both links say Johnson steals more support from Hillary than Trump. But Johnson has no chance to win.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...nton-or-trump/
http://www.theblaze.com/contribution...a-wasted-vote/ Originally Posted by i'va biggen
A shit throwing monkey like yourself is complaining about other shit throwing monkeys!You don't get it, do you? My problem isn't with shit-throwing per se. My problem is that all the libtard monkeys in this forum are incapable of throwing anything BUT shit. They don't know how to throw factual evidence, logic or well-reasoned arguments into the mix as well.Originally Posted by bobbeemagee
You start a thread implying that liberals here are somehow not sophisticated enough for you - and you refer to them with names some 12 year old would be too embarrassed to use. Assup? Really?Hey Ass-sloth... read my above response to bobbeemagee. You have 29 posts. It's obvious from your comment that you don't hang out in this forum.
The irony of your claim would be laughable if not so common. Originally Posted by Asfaloth54
Case in point - another limp post from one of our unintelligent resident liberals adding nothing to this thread.
Here are some of the better WSJ comments:
"What a lame argument is presented here. No one on Trump's side has been claiming that all the jobs lost since the early 1900s can be brought back. They are saying that the government is affecting those that remain--and that is the government's fault.
The point is that Obama and Clinton do not give a rip if the miners and their families are hurt, because they do not vote for donkeys. If they did, these political lowlifes would have a reason to back off--and would.
If the government targeted the jobs held by columnists like Mr. Galston, we might be hearing him squeal that he's a helpless victim of the government. When it is not your ox being gored, you often lack any caring for the other guy in his trouble, and that is the case here."
Or this one:
"It is understandable that coal miners would believe that there is a war on coal. Here are the facts from their perspective.
1. The highest US coal production ever was in 2008, the year before President Obama took office.
2. The EPA has made it impossible to build new coal power plants.
3. The Army Corps of Engineers has retroactively yanked permits for coal mines that had been approved in the Appalachians.
4. President Obama's allies have blocked the construction of terminals for exporting coal to other countries." Originally Posted by lustylad
You don't get it, do you? My problem isn't with throwing shit per se. My problem is that all the libtard monkeys in this forum are incapable of throwing anything BUT shit. They don't know how to throw factual evidence, logic or well-reasoned arguments into the mix.LMAO you start of with insults, and think you are making a meaningful thread. Number one you group anyone who disagrees with your slanted vision of reality a liberal. Number two most of anything you post on this forum is either a lie or BS. Anytime a link is posted showing you are full of shit the only result is a meltdown with name calling. If you think you are above the fray you are disillusioned.
Try to pay better attention. Originally Posted by lustylad
LMAO you start of with insults, and think you are making a meaningful thread. Number one you group anyone who disagrees with your slanted vision of reality a liberal. Number two most of anything you post on this forum is either a lie or BS. Anytime a link is posted showing you are full of shit the only result is a meltdown with name calling. If you think you are above the fray you are disillusioned. Originally Posted by i'va biggenOh, so you're a saint Lenny? I refrained from fucking with you for years. Then you started opening your pie hole. With insults. I guess Asswipe told you to do it. But you rarely debate without hurling insults. I'm quite sure if the management on ECCIE would crack down on this forum, and only true debate was allowed, you, Asswipe, and CJ would be in trouble. You couldn't handle it.
LMAO you start of (sic) with insults, and think you are making a meaningful thread. Number one you group anyone who disagrees with your slanted vision of reality a liberal. Number two most of anything you post on this forum is either a lie or BS. Anytime a link is posted showing you are full of shit the only result is a meltdown with name calling. If you think you are above the fray you are disillusioned. Originally Posted by i'va biggenCase in point - another limp post by one of our unintelligent resident liberals demonstrating an inability to present factual evidence, logic or well-reasoned arguments.
You're the douche-bag. Today's liberals ARE illiberal - by John Stuart Mill's definition.The words you attribute to Mill are taken out of context and from what Mill calls a "popular dictum". In your world of talking points and tweets, defining it's exact meaning requires more work than you're worth. It is from a lengthy book and isn't a definition of liberal or illiberal.
That's why whenever today's liberals lose an election, they whine and moan and say things like - "I can't believe so many people voted against their own self-interest!" And they don't say it to be funny, or with a trace of irony either.
You are half right asshole. Everyone who loses an election says something similar. A loser who doesn't think he should've won is a loser squared. Like you, L2 Originally Posted by lustylad
