Still No Crime.

Your right. When the other team scores two quick touchdowns, Ill get silent. So far the other team hasn't even got a first down

Evidence is Building Originally Posted by themystic

Yore right. 1st quarter 2 TDs IB! Originally Posted by themystic

so do what you said you would do dickhead STFU of the airhead twins

It's really not "fair" to ask him to "explain" anything.

If he weren't such a loudmouthed ass, I would say you were being unreasonable to make such a request. As he puts it: he doesn't "roll" that way!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

It's not unfair really. If you confront an idiot and request he elaborate on his nonsensical post he'll usually run and hide which breaks down his credibility. In the long run it's beneficial for everyone.


Jim

so do what you said you would do dickhead STFU of the airhead twins Originally Posted by gary5912

Fairy.

"You're, yore, you are, Your" a joke.

Please put the American Flag down and quit embarrassing the USMC and WW II veterans

It's really not "fair" to ask him to "explain" anything.

If he weren't such a loudmouthed ass, I would say you were being unreasonable to make such a request. As he puts it: he doesn't "roll" that way!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

You should before you post. The reason why "no one" knows about the "1945 McCaren Ferguson Act" is because it doesn't exist.

So before you get all mouthy .... check yours! Originally Posted by LexusLover

How come they are still trying to repeal a law you say does not exist?




http://www.iamagazine.com/news2017/03/23/house-passes-mccarran-ferguson-repeal-bill



. Originally Posted by WTF

Still waiting for your answer...

Treason is a very specific thing in legal terms. Anyone who knowingly charges someone with treason when the facts don't support it are themselves guilty of slander or libel depending on how the charge was made.

Have to start a new list of slanderous weasels: This is your official invitation WTF. Do you want to join the brotherhood of slanderous weasels? Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Had you been paying attention , you'd know that I think this is all politics. No, I do not think it
treason.

It is exactly wtf the Benghazi investigation was...politics.


.

I love it when Marx0crats mention my name in a thread, I have not posted in! IT MEANS WE ARE WINNING!!! MAGA BABY!!!

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Oh thats right IFFY.

DJT said I would get "tired of winning" I'm exhausted!

Far right radicals like you are just as jacked up as far left liberals

Far Right- Jesus and USA white America- Jesus was Aramaic and Trump is a Russian sympathizer. Far left is commie faggot's

Far Left- Everyone gets a Trophy. Far right buys the Trophies

Iffy welcome to the 21st century. People like you will fade away, bitter and longing for the "good old days". As Merle said, are " the good times really over for good"/ Bad news. Yes for uneducated white America

"You're, yore, you are, Your" a joke. Originally Posted by themystic

Actually, if you don't how or when to use them properly, you're the joke. Or would you like to join the other libtards in my signature?

for themiserable...

Treason is a very specific thing in legal terms... Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

I disagree. I think the meaning of treason is slippery and elusive. It's much easier to pin down if we are at war against a declared enemy. We're not at war with Russia. They are a frenemy. Obama led US business delegations to Moscow eager to expand trade and investment ties. For years, we resupplied our troops in Afghanistan through Russia. Yes, we've had to recalibrate our relationship since 2014 due to their unacceptable actions (emboldened by odumbo's foreign policy fecklessness) in Crimea, Ukraine and Syria. Less friend, more enemy, but still a frenemy. The problem with the libtard dimocrats is they act like someone flipped a switch and suddenly 25 years of history are erased and the Cold War never ended. And it's transparently obvious the dims are doing this for partisan domestic political reasons - the more people think we're at war with Russia, the easier it is to insinuate "treason".

If it is ok for Russia to meddle in our elections, why not let them vote also? Originally Posted by bamscram

LMAO! Who is saying its ok for Russia to meddle in our elections? Damn you're fucking stupid!

I agree you could say that about George W, Clinton, and many others. But the difference is DJT is president now.

Somethings going on with the Trump organization. Way to many connect the dots. You Trump defenders are either stupid, don't care or are truly delusional. Originally Posted by themystic

So it matters not to you that other politicians have done EXACTLY the same. Just that Don's in charge so lets toss the book at him, Kick him out and be done with his presidency??

It's not unfair really. If you confront an idiot and request he elaborate on his nonsensical post he'll usually run and hide which breaks down his credibility. In the long run it's beneficial for everyone.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

The flaw in your tactic is .... you are confronting "an idiot."

They may get banned, but they only "run and hide" if they know they can't "elaborate" on their "nonsensical post," which requires them to recognize and accept it was "nonsensical."

So it matters not to you that other politicians have done EXACTLY the same. Just that Don's in charge so lets toss the book at him, Kick him out and be done with his presidency?? Originally Posted by garhkal

Other politicians have been liars

Other Politicians haven't colluded with Russians or foreign governments in our elections

The reason the polls didn't show a Trump win, was the Trump people were just like the Donald, they lied to the pollsters

Liars and cheaters always lose in the end

Actually, if you don't how or when to use them properly, you're the joke. Or would you like to join the other libtards in my signature? Originally Posted by lustylad

Are you Gary the Fairys spokesman or bitch? Or both

Just like when the emails were leaked showing the clintons stole the election from sanders, they were all rampant about HOW they were leaked but not the CONTENT of what was leaked..



Check the constitution. Calling for impeachment cause of political ends, when there's no actual cause is seddition.. Which to me is what those 3 dems who ARE looking to try to impeach don need to be hit with. Originally Posted by garhkal

Another item the Main Stream Media ignores is IF our Constitutionally Protected Press would have done its job, there would have been no need for any clandestine investigations and releases of information by Foriegn Entities.

But our Media became nothing more than Lackeys for the DNC, and as you noted, a surrogate for the Clinton Camp when it was Democrat against Democrat.

The designers of our Constitution included special provisions in our Bill of Rights to insure that we would have a free Press. But, I'm not sure they foresaw a time when that Press would become the Lapdog of one Political Party and one Political Agenda.

When someone asks the question......."did the Russians hack the 2016 Presidential Election"? The answer should be "yes, they did what our media would not, exposing Hillary Clinton to be the lying, despicable, money grubbing sexual predator enabling cunt that she is"