Why Is Trump Now Going After Good Ole Racist Boy Jeff Sessions

Can't wait till FRIDAY!!!

Strange if he was honest and truthful, he wouldn't have omitted his meetings, CAUSING HIM to be forced to recuse himself.. Originally Posted by garhkal

he was honest, the long-winded preamble to franken's question was what sessions addressed.

The longwinded preamble referred to the sleazy debunked lie of the dimocrats regarding the "dossier" about trump with which franken was attempting smear trump

sessions never answered the question itself which no one seemed to notice or care

sessions merely said as a surrogate he did not have some ongoing exchange with the Russians

this was franken's question:

"if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

this was the preamble to franken's question:

"CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

sessions said:

"Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities." (the continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and russian intermediaries).

Sessions continued. " I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it." (as a surrogate regarding the campaign)

he wasn't forced to recuse himself for the false claim you base your false assertion upon

there wasn't any single reason sessions recused himself and there weren't any reasons outstanding for the recusal for which a dimocrat a.g. would have done so

sessions had already decided to recuse himself under his honor code if there was evidence of Russian interference in the election due to his overall involvement in the election and campaign

it had nothing to do with some lie about him lying

What is Trump trying to hide so damn hard that he is willing to do this to Sessions ..... is the real question

he was honest, the long-winded preamble to franken's question was what sessions addressed.

The longwinded preamble referred to the sleazy debunked lie of the dimocrats regarding the "dossier" about trump with which franken was attempting smear trump

sessions never answered the question itself which no one seemed to notice or care

sessions merely said as a surrogate he did not have some ongoing exchange with the Russians

this was franken's question:

"if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

this was the preamble to franken's question:

"CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

sessions said:

"Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities." (the continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and russian intermediaries).

Sessions continued. " I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it." (as a surrogate regarding the campaign)

he wasn't forced to recuse himself for the false claim you base your false assertion upon

there wasn't any single reason sessions recused himself and there weren't any reasons outstanding for the recusal for which a dimocrat a.g. would have done so

sessions had already decided to recuse himself under his honor code if there was evidence of Russian interference in the election due to his overall involvement in the election and campaign

it had nothing to do with some lie about him lying Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

+1

LMAO!

As soon as Twitler thinks his ratings are beginning to drop (ACA debacle), he'll go after another member of his cabinet.

He still hasn't figured out that this shit is for real.

Maybe he'll ban transgender people from the military, while the SECDEF is on vacation...and then lie about why. Wouldn't surprise me one bit!

Good thing Sessions isn't a tranny.

BUT, I hear things about IBIdiot...

Recusing himself was the correct thing to do. The concept of bashing him for that is just dumb.

There are pleanty of legitimate things to bash him about.

Recusing himself was the correct thing to do. . Originally Posted by Old-T

So why didn't Lynch and holder recuse THEMSELVES from many of their investigations cause of their outright ties to certain groups?
OR Scouts Kagen and Ginsburg recuse themselves from any of those "gay marriage rights" cases, when BOTH HAVE precided over gay marriages/?

So why didn't Lynch and holder recuse THEMSELVES from many of their investigations cause of their outright ties to certain groups?
OR Scouts Kagen and Ginsburg recuse themselves from any of those "gay marriage rights" cases, when BOTH HAVE precided over gay marriages/? Originally Posted by garhkal

they happen to be dimocrats


so its honor (lack thereof)

that's not to say there arent honorable dimocrats, but you have to search

but its part of the nature that makes someone a dimocrat

as opposed to the general makeup of a conservative

So why didn't Lynch and holder recuse THEMSELVES from many of their investigations cause of their outright ties to certain groups?
OR Scouts Kagen and Ginsburg recuse themselves from any of those "gay marriage rights" cases, when BOTH HAVE precided over gay marriages/? Originally Posted by garhkal

Ingles, pot favor.

they happen to be dimocrats


so its honor (lack thereof)

that's not to say there arent honorable dimocrats, but you have to search

but its part of the nature that makes someone a dimocrat

as opposed to the general makeup of a conservative Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

So is Trump a democrat for bashing Sessions for doing the honorable thing?

See how stupid your posts are when broken down? No linear logic, just partisan bs on your part.

Your first point:
They probably should have.

Second point: your comment is dumb.

So why didn't Lynch and holder recuse THEMSELVES from many of their investigations cause of their outright ties to certain groups?
OR Scouts Kagen and Ginsburg recuse themselves from any of those "gay marriage rights" cases, when BOTH HAVE precided over gay marriages/? Originally Posted by garhkal

Old T.. Why is it dumb?

Old T.. Why is it dumb? Originally Posted by garhkal

Because he doesn't agree with it.

That's the Liberal's standard grade school playground response.

The Liberals believe that is a viable, intellectual response.

Remember Gruber? He wasn't laughing at the Conservatives!

Because he doesn't agree with it.

That's the Liberal's standard grade school playground response.

The Liberals believe that is a viable, intellectual response.

Remember Gruber? He wasn't laughing at the Conservatives! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Lemmings are the new liberals. What you posted apply s to them.