Illegal arrest?

WTF ... vvvvvvv



The No. 1 Spam Man!

No there has not been a trial where you then can play Monday morning quarterback.

What has been asked is wtf you think about what we know know. If further evidence comes out that this nurse was a serial cop killer and about to murder this cop, one can then change their opinion.

You just do not have the balls to say a cop was wrong.



. Originally Posted by WTF

Question not answered....

I'm not disagreeing with your assessment and the issues you have raised about it, but ...

...a "compromise" may be that the sample and/or results be ERASED/ELIMINATED/DESTROYED from any evidence related to the case for which the person was arrested and any data base holding the results of any tests from the samples REGARDLESS of whether the case is "expunged" from the person's record after the case is dismissed or a nonprosecution decision made by a grand jury and/or a prosecutor/DA. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Thing is Lexus. We've seen COURTS RULE that the cops CAN'T keep taken DNA, and even 5+ years later, those databases STILL HAVE the DNA in them, cause the cops refuse to follow the courts order.. SO I WOULDN'T trust any 'compromise' like that..

Hell in the UK< the EU Human rights tribuals have ruled time and time again, cops are BREAKING the law by taking DNA and storing it in those databases, with no probable cause/convictions, and awarded lots of money to people CAUSE of the cops failing to uphold the courts ruling, BUT THOSE COPS are STILL WORKING, and none have been fired/jailed... THIS IS WHY I don't trust these databases..

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/arr...z&ocid=U221DHP



Supreme Court ruled in 2016 that a blood sample cannot be taken without patient consent or a warrant.



.

The Cop was in the wrong, his superiors think so too, that's all I need. He's under investigation for his actions. This sort of thing happens constantly. Today's cops have no people skills, they've thrown professionalism completely out the window. They aren't even that good at their job, that's why they become news stories so often.

Jim

https://youtu.be/cITA9HcX77I

The Cop was in the wrong, his superiors think so too, that's all I need. He's under investigation for his actions. This sort of thing happens constantly. Today's cops have no people skills, they've thrown professionalism completely out the window. They aren't even that good at their job, that's why they become news stories so often.

Jim

https://youtu.be/cITA9HcX77I Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

All cops? That's a problem with these front page stories of "police brutality" is people end up painting ALL COPS with the same broad brush. Last I recall there was an estimate of about 600,000 law enforcement officers in this country and you, like a lot of people, want to characterize ALL OF THEM.

There are physicians who are quacks and fuck em shit with patients. So don't go to any doctor, MOJO, because a few are "quacks and fuck em shit with patients." Same with any profession ... or business.

It's just it's "fashionable" on a hooker board to be a "bad boy" bashing ALL COPS, since you think ALL COPS get in between you and the pussy slinging going on. Then goofballs and want-a-be cockblockers, like WTF, decide to attempt to tattoo someone like me as a "snitch" or "cop" ... because I say ... NOT ALL COPS ABUSE CITIZENS OR BEAT THEM. That's what this thread is about: Didn't you know that?

Don't you have a good government conspiracy to be concerned about?

Here's one: Hurricane Irma is being created by our government to punish us again.

Is WTF disappointed that no one stood up for cop? That's why he doesn't get conservatives, he doesn't understand that we stand for rule of law and the Constitution. We don't stand for every cop that abusing his authority. The left has stood for abusive cops...if they're going for the right person.

Then goofballs and want-a-be cockblockers, like WTF, decide to attempt to tattoo someone like me as a "snitch" or "cop" ... because I say ... NOT ALL COPS ABUSE CITIZENS OR BEAT THEM. That's what this thread is about: Didn't you know that?

. Originally Posted by LexusLover

No this thread was about one Cop and so far you have been the only poster to defend this officers actions. Why is that LL. Why are you the only one defending the indefensible?

Why do you paint with a broad brush concerning liberals and then get on Mr. Mojo when he paints woth a broad brush regarding cops? Is it because you are a hypocrite?

Is WTF disappointed that no one stood up for cop? That's why he doesn't get conservatives, he doesn't understand that we stand for rule of law and the Constitution. We don't stand for every cop that abusing his authority. The left has stood for abusive cops...if they're going for the right person. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

LexusLover stood up for this Cop.

So no, I'm actually encouraged that most on here find what this Cop did worthy of firing.

All cops? That's a problem with these front page stories of "police brutality" is people end up painting ALL COPS with the same broad brush. Last I recall there was an estimate of about 600,000 law enforcement officers in this country and you, like a lot of people, want to characterize ALL OF THEM.

There are physicians who are quacks and fuck em shit with patients. So don't go to any doctor, MOJO, because a few are "quacks and fuck em shit with patients." Same with any profession ... or business.

It's just it's "fashionable" on a hooker board to be a "bad boy" bashing ALL COPS, since you think ALL COPS get in between you and the pussy slinging going on. Then goofballs and want-a-be cockblockers, like WTF, decide to attempt to tattoo someone like me as a "snitch" or "cop" ... because I say ... NOT ALL COPS ABUSE CITIZENS OR BEAT THEM. That's what this thread is about: Didn't you know that?

Don't you have a good government conspiracy to be concerned about?

Here's one: Hurricane Irma is being created by our government to punish us again. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I didn't say all Cops, but if you want to get technical, I would say most. What you don't seem to get in this case is the Cop doesn't run the hospital and the Nurse doesn't take orders from the Cop in terms of her job. What's more ridiculous than a conspiracy theory is your notion that the Cop reacted in this situation professionally.

Jim

What's more ridiculous than a conspiracy theory is your notion that the Cop reacted in this situation professionally.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Yes, LL is the only poster so far , who yhinks that. Though I'm sure he will try and back track or he may double down like he has on the "all drivers need permits" thread!

He's low on his meds.

LLIarMan has someone else's LexisNexis account number.

That's OK. The WHOLE FUCKING WORLD has his account number.

DESPICABLE. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Just a "heads up" ...

I sent a screen shot of the above post to the LexisNexis internet fraud section supervisor to follow up.

It's my understanding they take breaches of their data bases seriously, since they contract with the Federal government to provide services, as well as other government agencies around the country.

"That's how I roll"!

Just a "heads up" ...

I sent a screen shot of the above post to the LexisNexis internet fraud section supervisor to follow up.

It's my understanding they take breaches of their data bases seriously, since they contract with the Federal government to provide services, as well as other government agencies around the country.

"That's how I roll"! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Snitches gotta snitch...

Police cannot just get physical and arrest people.

If a police officer saw a person being assaulted, wouldn't they step in?

Why didn't the other police officers there, who were standing right there, stop the crazy cop?

They knew the guy wasn't under arrest and that there was no probable cause. What exactly could they have thought was crazy cop's justification for assaulting the woman?

How can they justify their inaction?

Crazy cop wouldn't pull that shit if he knew others would arrest him.