- LexusLover
- 09-21-2017, 04:55 AM
SCOTUS ... making American Great Again!
- Yssup Rider
- 09-21-2017, 08:58 AM
Another day, andother FULL PAGE SPAM ATTACK BY LLIARMAN!
All the bitching last week has yielded exactly NOTHING!
LLiarMan was bumping the board crazy then and he's still doing it now.
WE can now see that all the whining, complaining, suggesting that bumpghazi actions be printable offenses, etc., really has only been about ONE poster.
He's turned ECCIE into a SHARTNADO!!!!
All the bitching last week has yielded exactly NOTHING!
LLiarMan was bumping the board crazy then and he's still doing it now.
WE can now see that all the whining, complaining, suggesting that bumpghazi actions be printable offenses, etc., really has only been about ONE poster.
He's turned ECCIE into a SHARTNADO!!!!
- LexusLover
- 09-21-2017, 09:21 AM
^^^ AssUP is another one that needs to grow up!
- SpeedRacerXXX
- 09-22-2017, 07:51 AM
Interesting. You do realize that the travel ban was put into effect on June 26th and the first part runs out this coming Sunday?
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-n...921-story.html
"On March 6, Trump signed a new order that dropped Iraq from the list but kept the ban in place for 90 days for the other six countries. The order instructed Homeland Security to conduct a “worldwide review” of security conditions to determine whether the U.S. could be confident that it could identify which travelers could pose a threat.
The Supreme Court allowed the order to take effect on June 26; the 90-day clock runs out on Sunday."
"The order also stopped all refugee resettlement in the U.S. for 120 days, so that ban would continue in effect for roughly a month more. The Supreme Court in June had allowed the refugee ban to take effect, with exceptions for refugees who could show a “bona fide” connection to the U.S., along with a revised travel ban for 90 days in the six specified nations."
I have no problem with the second EO travel ban. Let's hold up the immigration process from those 6 countries while a team examines the vetting processes in place and determine whether or not they are adequate. The time requested in almost up. What progress has been made? If the request from Trump is that the ban continues, explain what has been done and what still needs to be done. The ban, in my opinion, should NOT continue indefinitely.
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-n...921-story.html
"On March 6, Trump signed a new order that dropped Iraq from the list but kept the ban in place for 90 days for the other six countries. The order instructed Homeland Security to conduct a “worldwide review” of security conditions to determine whether the U.S. could be confident that it could identify which travelers could pose a threat.
The Supreme Court allowed the order to take effect on June 26; the 90-day clock runs out on Sunday."
"The order also stopped all refugee resettlement in the U.S. for 120 days, so that ban would continue in effect for roughly a month more. The Supreme Court in June had allowed the refugee ban to take effect, with exceptions for refugees who could show a “bona fide” connection to the U.S., along with a revised travel ban for 90 days in the six specified nations."
I have no problem with the second EO travel ban. Let's hold up the immigration process from those 6 countries while a team examines the vetting processes in place and determine whether or not they are adequate. The time requested in almost up. What progress has been made? If the request from Trump is that the ban continues, explain what has been done and what still needs to be done. The ban, in my opinion, should NOT continue indefinitely.