Elisabeth, pick up a copy of this month's Popular Science. This issue is discussed in a manner more understandable to the layman. These guys are talking a bit over everyone’s head. But they are doing it so eloquently.
Rakhir, Oshins and Rodram I would like to commend the same issue to the three of you. It evolves through four large articles in this months issue. While it is not focused on fracking it does give a rather interesting picture of the current status of the petroleum industry and how long we have to develop alternative energy sources.
Rakhir, I only hope that we don’t have to face the Lorenz butterfly effect to which chaos theory would lead. But you are right to bring up chaos theory and fracking in the same breath. We will probably shelve fracking until we know what the down side will be, after all someone might get hurt using this dangerous method. Following this logic Hoover Dam would be an abandoned project.
I already make my coffee with bottled water I don’t want to have to shower with it also.
Obviously we need other sources of energy and those are not on the horizon, a blade on a windmill might fall off and hurt someone or a bird could get hurt flying into the thing.
OK FOLKS WARNING THE FOLLOWING IS NOT INTENDED FOR EVERYONE. SPOLIER ……
IF YOU ARE UNDER 50 YEARS OF AGE DON’T READ THE FOLLOWING.
S
T
O
P
Reading
Here
*
*
We don’t have a problem with lack of resources we have a problem with overabundance of people using those resources. If we cannot increase the availability of resources we must decrease the number of people relying on those limited resources.
Dr. Strangelove.
If we lowered Earths population to roughly a quarter of a billion we would have plenty of petroleum to last into the next century.
