Am I overreacting?

Fair enough. Unfortunately I can't start a thread making fun of that clown because it would be closed ASAP with the new rules, so I guess I'm done with the fun I want to have. Anyway, since you insist that it's on topic, I mentioned copyright laws and how it does not apply to posts or signature lines on a whore board. I believe that's on topic. If the OP doesn't want her catch phrases for tricks out there, keep the shit private and don't make it public. The end.

You don't seem that smart to me, Lucas. I think you're a poser pretending to be highly educated. You don't even have enough reading comprehension skills to understand what "most" means. Either that or you don't understand what absolutes are. Which would be weird, since you're the one that brought that up with no prompting from anyone.

Also, with that big, throbbing, hard, veiny.... brain you've got, I'd have thought you'd come up with something better than "clown." And then you have to reuse it? Your Ivy League schools clearly didn't stress vocabulary.

All I see are empty threats and chest-thumping. You want to prove you're smarter than me, do it. Don't say it. Be it.

B Three: Only because I like you will I stop. But only if Lucas will put his half-inch of limpness back in his pants. I'll allow him one more snide comment about what he could do if he wanted, by golly. Because apparently he needs to save face in front of idiots he's hypnotized into thinking he's smart. But just one.

Go ahead, Lucas. Stun me with your brilliance.

Go ahead, Lucas. Stun me with your brilliance. Originally Posted by dgc92

You're funny. Keep defending your stupidity by any means necessary. What was the handle you ran from? Let's go with that before your long winded ass gets points and I get points. I can't even read your long winded shit because you bore me. What was your former handle? Let's just make this easy.

As far as my education, I care if one firm knows about it - my current employer because that is where my bread is buttered. That's all that matters to me. Some big mouth clown running from handles on a whore board who goes by the the name of dgc92 doesn't mean jack shit to a man like me. You're just comedy to me. Don't take yourself so seriously. I sure the fuck don't. Now that you have lost your shit and turned into a retarded child, it is funny to me though. You were easier than I thought. I love it! Oh well, I have at least 5 points coming my way. How many did you get simpleton?

I think it's pretty safe to say that we are both really off topic right now. Let the points come. LOL

Yeah I’m curious as to what his other handle is/was as well. I imagine from his postings that he is one of those dudes that gets bossed around at home by the wife. She’s a the typical controlling bitchy wife that probably hasn’t given him pussy or a blow job in years. His boss probably doesn’t respect him either. He has zero control in his real life so he likes to come on here so he can feel “in charge”

Clearly whoever the coward is doesn’t know me at all. Just because a lady speaks her mind and isn’t a doormat does not mean she’s dominant with gps. Ask anyone that’s reviewed me my personality is definitely on the more submissive side in session. My rates are actually very standard for a provider with hundreds of good reviews, a clean private incall in a nice and desired area for hobbying, and good service in this market.

I was simply making a suggestion that may help the op and stop the theft of her sig line.

As far as certain providers not responding to references for ladies they “don’t like” that says a whole lot more about them than it does about me. I give references to ladies I don’t necessarily “like” or agree with allllll the time. References are supposed to keep us safe. Not really a popularity contest.

Sorry to get back on topic, but...definitely overreacting!

...no reason to read the reply...it's always the same 7 or 8 respondents every time.

Oh Jesus fuck.

Okay, after what Jules said, I felt like I needed to justify myself and prove she IS a domineering bitch (because I only promised I'd stop with Lucas, Jules is still fair game), so I used search to dig up two threads where she was particularly egregious. And... she wasn't. She didn't even post in one of the threads I was thinking of. I looked through her recent posts, and found zero instances of her being anything other than pleasant.

No way around it. I was wrong.

So I'm not sure what happened there. Did I mix her up with someone else? Did I misremember which threads this happened in? Was I drinking and foruming, which made me take offense at things that a normal person wouldn't take offense at? All distinct possibilities.

Jules.... My bad. I wish I had an explanation, but I don't at all. This has made me reconsider all the people I hate and wonder whether I hallucinated the whole thing with them too. Very sorry about that.

Getting back on topic, short phrases on a whore board or anywhere are NOT eligible for copyright. If it’s a short phase or slogan that specifically identifies something like a business, then one might be able to seek trademark protection.

However, regarding a longer post on a “whore” board, I can claim copyright protection on it. If memory serves, as long as my post contains at least a minimum degree of creativity, I can claim copyright protection wherever I write it. Now, claiming copyright protection doesn’t equate to winning in court should I sue the person who stole my work, but it might, especially if they used it for financial gain.

So, Kaitlyn, come up with something super creative and catchy and trademark it. But make sure you use the (™) until you file paperwork and receive registration, then and only then can you use the (®).

I hope Lucas, KD, and Dg found this post helpful.

© B Three 2018

I say you start posting "Red Rover Red Rover let Kaitlyn come over!" If anyone steals it, we'll know, and I volunteer to kick their asses.

Oh Jesus fuck.

Okay, after what Jules said, I felt like I needed to justify myself and prove she IS a domineering bitch (because I only promised I'd stop with Lucas, Jules is still fair game), so I used search to dig up two threads where she was particularly egregious. And... she wasn't. She didn't even post in one of the threads I was thinking of. I looked through her recent posts, and found zero instances of her being anything other than pleasant.

No way around it. I was wrong.

So I'm not sure what happened there. Did I mix her up with someone else? Did I misremember which threads this happened in? Was I drinking and foruming, which made me take offense at things that a normal person wouldn't take offense at? All distinct possibilities.

Jules.... My bad. I wish I had an explanation, but I don't at all. This has made me reconsider all the people I hate and wonder whether I hallucinated the whole thing with them too. Very sorry about that. Originally Posted by dgc92

It’s all good I really do appreciate the apology. Thank you and happy holidays to you

I hope Lucas, KD, and Dg found this post helpful.

© B Three 2018 Originally Posted by B Three

Unfortunately because of the career path that I chose, I was forced to take too many law classes. I have no business knowing so much about laws for what I do, but I had to learn and know a lot about nothing. Anyway, I digress, this board is about illegal activity here in Texas. There is no copyright infringement or any protection for your acts for that matter when you engage in illegal activity on a board like this. I'm sure there are some attorneys on this board. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

I could use B Three 2018 and what are you going to do? Tell me I stole it from ECCIE and take Lucas McCain to court? There is nothing that is posted on this site that is proprietary. Hell, people don't even use their real names on this site.

You’re wrong. Lol. Plain and simple. But if you studied this subject before 1979, then you might be right in some cases. But, it think you’d agree, Intellectual Property law has changed immensely even in the past few decades.

This board is protected by the first amendment regardless of a nexus to alleged illegal activity and it’s intended purpose. There is nothing illegal about the existence of eccie. There is nothing illegal about the posts, the only blurred line is whether review recommendations constitute some sort of promotion of (alleged) illegal acts. Which in itself, is a weak argument that hasn’t had much weight in court beyond, perhaps, leverage in a plea bargain. Even the advertising is not illegal because it does not constitute a valid offer.

Copyright starts the minute I put something down in writing. It matters not the venue as long as it’s something original and fixed in a tangible medium of expression, it is entitled to copyright protection and it matters not if I put a © next to it. The © and registering it merely prove its existence and when it was written. What makes a copyright is that it is my original thoughts and ideas, not the circumstances or location of its creation. What makes you successful in court is proving you were the first to register it. That’s why they call sending it to yourself in the mail (and leaving it sealed), “the poor man’s copyright.” Of course there are exceptions for “fair use” etc., but just stealing my words for your own purpose or gain, isn’t fair use.

I will agree that the fill in the blank part of a review are probably not eligible for copyright protection, but the ROS should be. At least two circuit courts (5th and 9th) have ruled that illegal works are eligible for copyright protection (e.g., snuff films, illegal pornography, hate speech). Some district courts (in the 2nd circuit) have disagreed to some point and eventually a case will make it to the US Supreme Court. I predict they will uphold copyright protection in the basis that the intention of copyright laws is not to censor, but to protect creative works. Prohibition of the publication of illegal works is something better addressed legislatively not judicially.

This site is no different in the minds of the court than sites with creative writing pieces and those are also worthy of copyright protection. And yes, if you took this very post and posted it elsewhere as your own (or simply without my permission) and I wanted to pursue it legally, damn right I could.

I would first send you an email, asking you to remove. Then if you didn’t, I would send a request to the webmaster. If that did not work, I would send a cease and desist and takedown notice. I could subpoena the website for your IP address, and so on and so on. I could go on with filing a lawsuit using your alias, but let’s face it, by that time, it would be removed. If you made money from my works, there might well be a paper trial, as well. If not, then the best remedy is a simple removal.

Cases, both criminal and civil are filed everyday without real names. Many times to prevent the statute of limitations from tolling. That’s not unusual.

So, In a nutshell, yes, my original, creative, thoughtful words here, in a tangible medium, are copyright-worthy. If Kaitlyn Dior starts a thread in CoEd with flowery prose and/or creative thought, that too is copyright-worthy. Your post above, is copyright-worthy, regardless of the little © or not. The little © just gives people fair warning that you’re serious about protecting your work.

Another fun fact: you can’t copyright your name. Those engaged in the Sovereign Citizen Movement have tried this and it does not work. It’s an interesting topic to read about though. They sue the government for copyright infringement every time the government uses their name.

So, while I can’t copright “B Three,”I could trademark “You can’t spell BBBJ with 3 B’s”

You can’t spell BBBJ without 3 Bs! ™

© B Three 2018

Your name is just ripe for jokes, B Three. I was drinking and foruming once (as I am wont to do) and thought about sending you a PM along the lines of "Does B Three do B Two?" Luckily, even in my drunken haze I knew that was a bad idea.

Also, arguing with Lucas about highbrow topics is pointless. He admitted to me in a PM conversation that he's a high school dropout. Get him to post the convo if you don't believe me. I'm okay with it. No points for Lucas for sharing my PMs, mods.

Xoxo, dg.

I’m not arguing with Lucas, I like him and his take on things. I do know he’s an intelligent guy. That’s why I’m not arguing but rather educating. It just happens to be a topic I know a whole lot about off the top of my head. Plus, it’s definiteoh on topic here on eccie where I get PMs with girls complaining about everything from KD’s concern to girls copying whole websites and stealing pictures or websites stealing content. It happens all the time and we’ve been rather successful with takedown requests when issued.

SO, it’s important to know what is protected and what is not. While I honestly don’t know if eccie TOS gives them superior proprietary rights to what we write here, the solution to that is to have a blog where I post a copy before I post here.

You’re wrong. Lol. Plain and simple. But if you studied this subject before 1979, then you might be right in some cases. Originally Posted by B Three

I wasn't even born in 1979. I don't think my parents even met each other by then

I'll be honest, I didn't read all of your post because I have a really low attention span on the internet. Unless it's about sports, I usually can't get past a few sentences. I save my reading for the 50-70 annoying emails I get at work everyday.

Anyway, unless what anything you wrote is actually actionable, to me it has no merit based on that fact alone because of the nature of this board. I'm not even sure why I'm talking about this shit. This was a threAD. It's hardly worth discussing further. I think I got a little too deep about copyright crap and I doubt the OP is even reading this threAD now.

It happens.

College Fun Girl copied my entire text from my website, verbatim. Even my bio from Twitter then had the audacity to follow me and like my tweets.

And of course I called her out of which she quickly changed, without a response to me.

It wouldn't be a big deal however I actually have put forth the effort into building a website and spent countless hours on the bio, consideration rates etc for someone to copy and paste the work I have done.

Learn to be creative. It's not that damn hard to market yourself.