I would bet when this is all over that this cameras and mics in the room shit will be found to be overreach.
Originally Posted by Dogface78
What's the number? I like the other side of the bet.
We have what's called a reasonable expectation of privacy, when we go into a dressing room, doctors office, a public bathroom, and yes a massage parlor, and take off our clothes, even if a crimes maybe being committed in those places you are still not permitted to have cameras present even though to store owns the property they still cannot put them in their own dressing rooms, in their own place of business!
Originally Posted by Dogface78
You don't enjoy the enhanced expectation of privacy anywhere but your hotel room or residence and a warrant supersedes it. Without dragging out SCOTUS citations, suffice it to say that in this case:
1. They had credible reports of prostitution on the premises.
2. They set up surveillance.
3. They documented instruments of crime in the trash.
4. They have witnesses who told them what was going on inside.
Despite having all this, they can't put cameras _inside_ yet. They show this to a judge, who issues the warrant for interior surveillance. While Bob Kraft might have some great lawyers they will be like the shit i took this morning: have a lot of sound and fury, but the effort won't go real far.
The blame here is on the dudes pulled over for not using their turn signals who didn't do the "am I free to go" routine and eat a ticket for failure to signal.