Ladies, are some of the reviewers full of shit?

Pfft!! I don't know what you guys are talking about. I am the bomb!! I tear pussy up. My beautiful dick brings women great pleasure, so much so that I they try to sneak the donation back in my pocket when I'm not looking (I sneak it back out when they're not looking).

I should be doing porn, but choose not to, because I want to save myself for you ladies. Yeah. I mean, I even hold back in reviews, to try to sound mortal. I don't want to give guys impossible standards to try to live up to.

Just saying.

Way more relaxed screening ?
No screening at all?
The hunt?
A sense of more anomity ?
Hiding behind a persona?

Those are the first reasons a guy might seek on LC or SA that come to my mind

. Originally Posted by Analeese

Yeah, these are fair reasons, but with reservations. We don't all 'hate' screening, we don't just want to deal with it EEEEEVEEERRRYYYYY TTTIIIIMMMMMEEEE want to get a lil bit. Some screening takes DAYS. Shit, I want some pussy NOW...I wanted some a half hour ago, maybe longer. The urge is there...I mean, here. It's now...not four hours from now. Just saying.

Hell, it takes a day to even get a response from some of you ladies...THEN, we gotta agree to visit, THEN start the process to seeing each other (what time works for who, mile long reference list, ton of info, first born, etc

Maybe I should just spank one off instead, and relish in the joy of saving time, money, and hassle of driving, etc.

Oh, that's right. I want to grab some ass, suck on some tits, and peel some panties.

I know, I know...you gotta screen. I get it. But there should be levels to it. New guy, no board presence, one [half ass] review. Sure...screen the shit out of him. Veteran board guy. Tons of reviews. Million posts. Talks shit all day (good and bad)....ok, maybe we can skip screening steps 2 and 6.

Just saying.

You know, we do it with you ladies. I feel a lot better chasing a provider with 30 reviews and been around a couple years vs a new provider with a couple reviews, been on board for 3-4 months, and only handful of posts.

Maybe I should just spank one off instead, and relish in the joy of saving time, money, and hassle of driving, etc.

I’m teaching my milfy friend this....it’s an urge for most guys and those it isn’t will schedule ahead of time but you gotta stay ready

I know, I know...you gotta screen. I get it. But there should be levels to it. New guy, no board presence, one [half ass] review. Sure...screen the shit out of him. Veteran board guy. Tons of reviews. Million posts. Talks shit all day (good and bad)....ok, maybe we can skip screening steps 2 and 6.

Just saying.

You know, we do it with you ladies. I feel a lot better chasing a provider with 30 reviews and been around a couple years vs a new provider with a couple reviews, been on board for 3-4 months, and only handful of posts. Originally Posted by Randall Creed

I always take into consideration a vents veteran or non veteran status . I e been around for almost decade and pretty familiar with most of the players here so lots of things are taken into consideration during screening . I totally hear what you’re saying !

Really? Read the reviews, take what you want from them as factual and discard the balance as fiction.

One key signal to me that the Bullshit Quotient is high, is when a reviewer says something like "She suited me up with a magnum..." blah, blah blah. That tells me the reviewer is more interested in promoting his purported big dick and skills, than being factual. (He could have simply said, "She had a great assortment of condoms to choose from.")

The other thing to consider is chemistry. One reviewers great chemistry might lead to a fabulous session and subsequent glowing review. Another gent, might have a so-so experience. In fact I saw a gal yesterday, with tons of glowing reviews. Clearly she wasn't into me, I thought her skills were average at best, and it was hurry up and finish so you can leave. WALDT and reviews are very subjective... Originally Posted by Billy Babitt

I completely agree with taking what you can from the reviews. A good connection is definitely key. I personally have only done reviews on Eccie girls that rely on those reviews and gave a great experience, or anyone who was an obvious scam. There have been plenty who just weren’t worth the $, but weren’t necessarily bad people. If they were cool with me, but failed miserably in performance, I usually wouldn’t do a review at all. What sucked for me may knock the next guys socks off and it’s not fair to the girl that she tried and I happen to be picky.
My whole point in starting this thread was simply to see how much BS the girls see in the reviews. I was unaware that their access was limited.

note: when one reads "you" or "yours" below, know that it can mean wile e. or it can mean any eccie user.



obviously, i did not get my points across.

1) reviews are whatever the writer wants them to be.
and since there are not any rules or objective evaluation criteria on how they ARE SUPPOSED to be written, no one can say with 100% certaintity that
a) they ARE supposed to be a true objective recounting of an encounter between one or more guys and one or more providers,
b) they ARE NOT supposed to be truly objective, or
c) they ARE supposed to be a specific or variable mix of both.

2. thus, when i read a review, i realize that it's MOSTLY fiction and SOME reality in there.

so, if i believe what i read, it was "true" for me.
if i think it's fictional (including exaggerated for whatever reason), it was "not completely true" for me.
what you believe is what you believe, not something i decide for you.

take a review for whatever worth you read in a review.
thus, i stand behind my two posts.



regardless if it's a negative or a postive review, each review has some truth and some fiction. a negative one can be true fantasy just as a positive one can.
if you dont know why someone "... in their right mind would post a negative review as his fantasy", i suggest you expand your concepts of what a review can be.

"guess that means how one should take the legitimacy of your reviews then, right?"
yes, by all means - question, laugh at, believe my reviews included. it only slightly matters to me.
my intent is my intent. i own it.
your understanding/reaction is yours. i suggest you own yours.

wrt to why i comment on some reviews, i ask questions to seek clarifications, not cos i want the reviews to be "true".

i love a great story, regardless if true or fictional.

thus, i stand behind my points of view.
and behind a woman when "walking her dog". Originally Posted by pmdelites

Well, for what it’s worth, if I take the time to write a review on ANY provider, you can take it to the bank that it’s exactly what happened. If anything, I leave some events out.

@ PMD
...
The trouble with embellished reviews for acceptance is when multiple guys read it, set an appointment and goes in expecting the same service and not getting it, not only does that leave a bad opinion of the original reviewer, ... So doing a fictitious review might put a provider in danger. Originally Posted by Wile E Coyote

in my hobby opinion...
if a client goes in blindly expecting to receive what he read in some review and then finds out that the provider doesnt provide said service (at all or just for him), that is on the client, not on the reviewer.

hope for the best and plan for the worst!

"In Buddhism, desire and ignorance lie at the root of suffering. By desire, Buddhists refer to craving pleasure, material goods, and immortality, all of which are wants that can never be satisfied. As a result, desiring them can only bring suffering. Ignorance, in comparison, relates to not seeing the world as it actually is. Without the capacity for mental concentration and insight, Buddhism explains, one's mind is left undeveloped, unable to grasp the true nature of things. Vices, such as greed, envy, hatred and anger, derive from this ignorance."
---- https://www.pbs.org/edens/thailand/buddhism.htm

...
All I am saying is a review, while opinionated by the reviewer, needs to be of his actual encounter, not of what he would have like to have happened or what she would like him to say and reporting it as fact. If that means he does not get any accolades for the great read, then so be it.

I will stand behind my points of view as well. Originally Posted by Wile E Coyote

good luck in getting reviewers to follow your requirement.

when reading any review (including mine), ...
take them for what they are worth, nothing more, nothing less.
use critical thinking and grains of salt.


regardless of these reviews, i hope everyone gets to experience some intimate delites this summer and in the future!!!

Well, for what it’s worth, if I take the time to write a review on ANY provider, you can take it to the bank that it’s exactly what happened. If anything, I leave some events out. Originally Posted by Alltugnorub

thanks for your comments. i applaud you for your commitment to posting reliable reviews of the deliteful or not-so-deliteful encounters you've had.

I think a lot of the reviews seem like pornos lol. I try to write as accurately as possible about what stood out to me, based upon my perspective and personal experience.

in my hobby opinion...
if a client goes in blindly expecting to receive what he read in some review and then finds out that the provider doesnt provide said service (at all or just for him), that is on the client, not on the reviewer.

hope for the best and plan for the worst!

"In Buddhism, desire and ignorance lie at the root of suffering. By desire, Buddhists refer to craving pleasure, material goods, and immortality, all of which are wants that can never be satisfied. As a result, desiring them can only bring suffering. Ignorance, in comparison, relates to not seeing the world as it actually is. Without the capacity for mental concentration and insight, Buddhism explains, one's mind is left undeveloped, unable to grasp the true nature of things. Vices, such as greed, envy, hatred and anger, derive from this ignorance."
---- https://www.pbs.org/edens/thailand/buddhism.htm

It is true that going in blindly may or may not yield the best result, but the fact is, a review board is suppose to help you to not go in so blindly that you have to hope for the best and plan for the worst. That is for the RW. In the HW, a hobbyist does not have to hope, he pays in order to get the best effort from the provider.

And from multiple responders in this thread, telling the truth about their experience far outweighs some made up fantasy for a good read and view count.


good luck in getting reviewers to follow your requirement.

when reading any review (including mine), ...
take them for what they are worth, nothing more, nothing less.
use critical thinking and grains of salt.


regardless of these reviews, i hope everyone gets to experience some intimate delites this summer and in the future!!! Originally Posted by pmdelites

It not my requirement. This is suppose to be a board where hobbyists provide other hobbyists with honest intel to make a decision to spend their money wisely. If you posted a poll on what guys would rather see, a review written that tells readers the reviewer's actual experience or a review written that is made up and reads like a romantic novel for reading, you will find that guys would rather have the former.

Sure, the glitz and glamor of a great read, getting the view counts and lots of attaboy comments, aka, dick stroke fest, even getting the designation of one of the best review writers on a SHMB may sound ideal. But I would rather have fellow hobbyists thank me for being honest and helping them make a decision to see a provider, telling me that my review is spot on than getting "great read" comments, just to have a hobbyist go and see her and come back on my review or sends me a PM that I am full of shit. Hence the reason for the OP of this thread to start it in the first place.

I have a question of curiosity for the providers. How often do you look at one of your reviews by a past client and see that he’s full of shit? Good or bad?
I’ll give an example: I often read reviews where guys say they daty a girl and give her 2-3 climaxes while doing so. Now I’m no magic tongue or anything, but I haven’t met a girl yet where I need more than 2-3 mins to get her off orally. I also haven’t met a girl yet that wants me to keep doing it after she hits that first O, at least not right after she hits it. It’s usually followed with something along the lines of “I need you to F me now”.
This and some other things lead me to believe that some of the fellas on here are full of shit and trying to get the other fellas to envy their “abilities”. Am I wrong? Originally Posted by Alltugnorub

I like to Fuck.. Every single word is true down to the last drop... and then some! Just sayin..

As a careful hobbiest, I tend to look at the reviews of someone I'm thinking about. There a few things that I like to have in a session (DFK, DATY, BBBJ). So, if any of those are off the list (LFK, No DATY, CBJ), I'll move on.

Of course, there are reviewers and REVIEWERS. It's good to see one from someone you trust. To date, none of my fellow Reviewers have led me astray and I've had many wonderful times.

I guess I'm like Melannie.

Bang

I like to Fuck.. Every single word is true down to the last drop... and then some! Just sayin.. Originally Posted by melannie_star

best answer yet!

I like to Fuck.. Every single word is true down to the last drop... and then some! Just sayin.. Originally Posted by melannie_star

I think I have to schedule time with Melannie.

Nice to see all the ladies (2 or 3) reply to this ladies' question while all the usual suspects of men blew it up with all their wisdom and "no" it all lol

Nice to see all the ladies (2 or 3) reply to this ladies' question while all the usual suspects of men blew it up with all their wisdom and "no" it all lol Originally Posted by Tsmokies

Awesome self defeating post.