In 2017, GDP in Austin was 10.8% for Government and 5.6% for education and health services. Those percentages for all large metro areas were 11.8% for government and 8.5 for education and health services.
In other words, Austin gets less of its GDP from the 2 areas you mentioned than the average large metro area.
Since you have no clue why someone from Austin might feel special, you make stuff up.
Because you won't ask.
And naturally you forget why we are even discussing this.
Because another know-nothing claimed Austin is a leach.
The uneducated base never ceases to amaze me.
You've shown you don't know what drives our economy here and you think our average at best strip clubs are noteworthy.
Hmmm.
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
I didn't make up anything and you didn't disprove anything I said.
Since 10.8% + 5.6% = 16.4% using your figures, I maintain it is a substantial contributor to the GDP of the area, and the inhabitants of the area greatly benefit from that.
If the "Forty Acres" were just another neighborhood, the GDP of Austin would be considerably lower - the positive impact of a major university on the economics of an area are incredible.
Being the capital city brings in many private and non profit organizations to do business with the government - that is so obvious that no one with much sense could deny it.
So, no big surprise, you just embarrassed yourself again. (You also demonstrated your poor education with multiple grammatical errors - I hope you didn't attend the University of Texas - that would be a stain upon that great institution to have a person like you associated with it)