"If I knew then, what I know now"

9500- u blew it - the old warner Bros. cartoons - had a message hidden in them - very much as did Rod Serling in Twilight Zone ( see darkness Falls episode).

A meme not quite as foolish as U intended.

LOL Originally Posted by oeb11

Off topic, but it was just announced in the new Warner Brothers shorts that Elmer Fudd will no longer carry a rifle. He wost his wight to bear arms, apparently.

More pandering.

Remember Charlton Heston - "From my cold, Dead Hands"!


How will Bugs be funny without "wabbit hunting"!

Fine, and if Flynn is guilty of a crime in that case, no problem here. I'm only commenting on the mountain of evidence we now see that the FBI sat on for over 3 years that Flynn did not conspire to interfere in the election and that talking to the Russian Amb. was not an illegal act. Nothing has changed on that front.





And the FBI lied to the FISA judge about Carter Page and withheld exculpatory evidence in the Flynn matter neither of which you seem to grasp or do but don't care. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

I am not excusing neither the FBI lying to the judge nor withholding evidence. You're right, I don't care. Both criminal, in my understanding.

I care more about the overall big picture. Flynn's actions after the election are what concern me the most. The Turkish/Russian connection is what I'm commenting on. Was it an underhanded play for power or just resources? And who gets it, or both.

Why did the National Security advisor lie to the Vice President?

9500- "I am not excusing neither the FBI lying to the judge nor withholding evidence. You're right, I don't care."


Made ur point - u r happy with flynn in prison as a political prisoner - not One who committed a crime.

Please post the nuclear head blowing up - it is apropos.

I am not excusing neither the FBI lying to the judge nor withholding evidence. You're right, I don't care. Both criminal, in my understanding.

I care more about the overall big picture. Flynn's actions after the election are what concern me the most. The Turkish/Russian connection is what I'm commenting on. Was it an underhanded play for power or just resources? And who gets it, or both.

Why did the National Security advisor lie to the Vice President?
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

UH! I don't care is excusing it!


Oh! You care about the "big picture"! Not whether Flynn conspired to interfere in the election, the reason for the "investigation". He did not.


Not whether Flynn made a quid pro quo deal with the Russian Amb. on sanctions. He did not but whether he did something illegal concerning Turkey which he hasn't been indicted for much less convicted. That's what you are worried about, something that has not been adjudicated yet. I wonder who else we might prosecute who made a deal with a foreign country for more power and resources what ever that means.


https://sunlightfoundation.com/2009/...gent-lobbying/


Do you care/ worry about any Democrats that lobby for foreign governments or is it just Republicans and specifically anybody associated with the Trump campaign? Do the actions of say Tony Podesta bother you?

Why did the National Security advisor lie to the Vice President?

That's a damn good question. I hope one day Flynn will tell us why he lied about something that was not illegal. That was a good reason for firing Flynn but not a good reason for prosecuting him.


But you've heard the tape of the "damning" phone call. Hear anything illegal in that call? And if so, why wasn't Flynn prosecuted for the content of the call and not whether he admitted to the call when questioned by the FBI which I still have seen no evidence of, only the word of the FBI which I don't believe for one second all things considered.

UH! I don't care is excusing it!

Not caring is acknowledging it exists. It has existed. And will continue to exist. Not excusing it. They are law enforcement. What the hell can I do about it?

Oh! You care about the "big picture"! Not whether Flynn conspired to interfere in the election, the reason for the "investigation". He did not.

Subject to investigation and interpretation.

Not whether Flynn made a quid pro quo deal with the Russian Amb. on sanctions. He did not but whether he did something illegal concerning Turkey which he hasn't been indicted for much less convicted. That's what you are worried about, something that has not been adjudicated yet. I wonder who else we might prosecute who made a deal with a foreign country for more power and resources what ever that means.


Why were the Russians so intent on getting him in the Whitehouse? And hiw is Flynn connected to the Russian/Turkis affair?

https://sunlightfoundation.com/2009/...gent-lobbying/


Do you care/ worry about any Democrats that lobby for foreign governments or is it just Republicans and specifically anybody associated with the Trump campaign? Do the actions of say Tony Podesta bother you?

That's a damn good question. I hope one day Flynn will tell us why he lied about something that was not illegal. That was a good reason for firing Flynn but not a good reason for prosecuting him.


But you've heard the tape of the "damning" phone call. Hear anything illegal in that call? And if so, why wasn't Flynn prosecuted for the content of the call and not whether he admitted to the call when questioned by the FBI which I still have seen no evidence of, only the word of the FBI which I don't believe for one second all things considered. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

My question is "why did the Turks have to use a front to conduct negotiations with our National Security advisor?"

Waste of bandwidth for a useless, irrelevant one-liner.
Puerile !!

My question is "why did the Turks have to use a front to conduct negotiations with our National Security advisor?" Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Sounds like you think you know the answer? What is it?


And if you don't think there is anything you can "do about it" why are you here telling us all what you would like to "do about it"? You want Flynn in jail for "politics as usual" as you have told us multiple times. Oh! you are only concerned when Republicans "do it" and when confronted with the fact that Democrats "do it", the best you can do is trot out "whataboutism", which only confirms you care "about it" when one party is involved and not your chosen party.


Every time you post, you become worse than I previously thought. Seems to be no end to it. I think I'm done with you. I've seen enough of your insufferable meme's.

The Capacity for Denial, Deflection , Obfuscation, and Hypocrisy is unlimited in DPST's!
Thank U - 9500!


u may now respond with a meme of YSL - effete and elitist symbol of the DPST Hypocrisy!

Every time you post, you become worse than I previously thought. Seems to be no end to it. I think I'm done with you. I've seen enough of your insufferable meme's. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

Yeah, right.

Until your thread is dead.

https://redirect.viglink.com/?format...court%20filing

Adviser to U.S. District Judge Argues Against Dismissing Flynn Case

https://www.thedailybeast.com/advise...ael-flynn-case

When federal prosecutors took the extremely unusual step last month of requesting that the court dismiss the case against Flynn—who had already pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI—Sullivan appointed Gleeson to argue against the government’s case.

That's lunch, people!

DPST judiciary lose not One opportunity to legislate from their bench.

Thank Heavens for trumps appointments - if Obama had filled up the slots - we would soon be ruled by the DPST Judiciary - no need for a legislative elected branch.

9500 - carefully consider - do you really want that Orwellian situation???
what does YSL say??