FIBTAB doing Gods work in Kenosha

well first the suspect is 17 and it is illegal to carry that weapon in the streets of wisconsin,

lets start there,

secondly, he killed and will be charged with murder, i believe the dumb idiot is not from the state let alone the town.

third, i believe you cannot just walk down the streets of a city with a weapon that is illegal and even carry it , he is not defending his house, oh hes 17,


yeah good luck with his defense team, he might as well get used to taking big chocolate cock up his ass because its coming his way

ha ha

dumb idiot

Amen - CT - The racist, marxist DPST paid , enabled "protestors" are for the most part out of town agitators there to stir up trouble and violence.

DPST mayors and governors have fomented and enabled their violence with the 'disband Police' movement - which means the agitators have no deterrence to rioting adn violence. .

I agree - they are not 'Protestors" - I support he right of peaceful assembly and peaceful protest demonstration by all points of View.

what hannah -Jones - calls 'non-violent protest; - has ended in deaths (perhaps justified) - but deaths. That is not peaceful.

kyle is vilified and demonized - jsut as Nickd Sandman was - by the media - Kyle may be somewhat at fault - but there will be a court of law to sort that out over time.

I am content to let our american Justice System take its' course. And support Kyle and contribute to his defense.


Again - I agree - those fomenting violence are not 'protestors' - they are Terrorists. and enabled and fomented by the racist, marxist DPST elected officials who have tolerated and approved of their riots/violence - such as mayor jenny, ted Wheler, mayor Lightfoot, and other, including the Governors who have refused Federal help from Trump to protect the innocent citizens. Originally Posted by oeb11

kyle is at fault


hes not a police officer, the weapon was illegal, hes 17 and theres no self defense there. he wasnt defending his house

add to that intent to kill is on a tv interview the dumb idiot did that he came there to kill his words

intent

50 to life with a strong strong chocalate fudge going up his ass on a daily basis

dumb idiot Originally Posted by Missburger

And what are your preferred pronouns, Dumb idiot?

And what are your preferred pronouns, Dumb idiot? Originally Posted by texassapper

dumb redneck is even better

Self awareness is priceless

With Lynn Wood as his attorney he has a chance of getting off and the media will have a billion dollars of lawsuits filed against them for what they said. Originally Posted by Bestman200600

He's got a great chance at getting off. However-- the lawsuits aren't as forthcoming as you might think. They got in trouble over Sandmann because they played the truncated tapes and didn't vet at all. In this case... its pretty well documented that the kid is 17.. carrying illegally.. not defending his own property.. and did shoot 3 people. He's not going to see the payday that Sandmann saw, even if he gets off 100%

He's got a great chance at getting off. However-- the lawsuits aren't as forthcoming as you might think. They got in trouble over Sandmann because they played the truncated tapes and didn't vet at all. In this case... its pretty well documented that the kid is 17.. carrying illegally.. not defending his own property.. and did shoot 3 people. He's not going to see the payday that Sandmann saw, even if he gets off 100% Originally Posted by Grace Preston

I don't know... I'm pretty sure calling someone a "white supremicist" is slander..

I'm not pro-riot or pro-looting and think all these people should go home. However, he has almost no chance of getting off. I was taught and this is true in most states that you cannot use deadly force to protect property. If someone is stealing your car out of your driveway, you cannot legally run out shoot and kill them.
Castle Doctrine, a different scenario, doesn't apply here.
In order to legally use deadly force, you have to be somewhere that you have a legal right to be, not involved in illegal activity such as carrying around an assault rifle underage and you have to feel that your life is in imminent danger. He's got 1 out of the 3.
Comparing his situation to Sandmann? Nick Sandmann did not commit a crime, was not charged with any crime. It's apples and oranges.

I'm not pro-riot or pro-looting and think all these people should go home. However, he has almost no chance of getting off. I was taught and this is true in most states that you cannot use deadly force to protect property. If someone is stealing your car out of your driveway, you cannot legally run out shoot and kill them.
Castle Doctrine, a different scenario, doesn't apply here.
In order to legally use deadly force, you have to be somewhere that you have a legal right to be, not involved in illegal activity such as carrying around an assault rifle underage and you have to feel that your life is in imminent danger. He's got 1 out of the 3.
Comparing his situation to Sandmann? Nick Sandmann did not commit a crime, was not charged with any crime. It's apples and oranges. Originally Posted by TheWanderer

He wasn't protecting anything... he'd left the lot... the only thing that matters is that he was being pursued by a crowd. All you have to do is show what happens to people when antifa/blm catch them... pretty simple.

You guys keep shitting yourselves over the letter of the law. This is beyond that. This kid will NEVER get convicted of anything because of the optics of every trial. If I sat on his jury I sure as shit wouldn't convict. And if you think I'm alone...you haven't been keeping up with the news.

His lawyers know this and they aren't going to do anything but say put me in front of 12. The DA knows it... hence charged up the ass. Meanwhile the felon with the handgun that he winged is running around scot free. hmmmmmmm

Anyway, this kid is going to walk away a millionaire. It took Sandman a few years but he got his... This kid will get it too.

Why is he walking away a millionaire?

I don't know that it will go to trial, certainly no murder conviction. Probably no conviction on any charge.

Why is he walking away a millionaire?

I don't know that it will go to trial, certainly no murder conviction. Probably no conviction on any charge. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Slander is a thing for private citizens. Cnn will probably get a spanking too.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/...hout-evidence/

For all you outhouse lawyers.

Here’s why Kyle Rittenhouse, the teen shooting suspect in Kenosha killings, is likely to get off

For all you outhouse lawyers.

Here’s why Kyle Rittenhouse, the teen shooting suspect in Kenosha killings, is likely to get off Originally Posted by texassapper

So he'll get off with no charges, no civil lawsuits and will earn millions from being "slandered" by social media? I have not seen any major publications report anything other than the current facts and that is that he is on video firing numerous rounds into a crowd, has been arrested and charged with murder. All this because an op-ed columnist for the Chicago Tribune named Eric Zorn said so?
Okay, good enough for me.

No because even brain dead liberal journalists can see the truth occasionally. Arrested and charged does not a conviction make. but tell yourself whatever you need to to keep from having to acknowledge it was a righteous shoot.

^^ Right DPST just doesn't understand "justified "