It wasn't avoided for the 298,000 in the USA that have died from it so far.That number is B.S. The true number is a fraction of that.
https://covidusa.net/ Originally Posted by adav8s28
It wasn't avoided for the 298,000 in the USA that have died from it so far.That number is B.S. The true number is a fraction of that.
https://covidusa.net/ Originally Posted by adav8s28
Yes, the people who have committed suicide this year are not coming back. The suicide rate is triple this year. OD's have doubled. All to control a virus w a 99.95% recovery rate.You are being lied to about the recovery rate of 99.95%.
Originally Posted by goodman0422
You are being lied to about the recovery rate of 99.95%.Looks like YOUR numbers are WRONG. And goddamn thats an ugly woman you have as an avatar!
.0005 * 330,000,000 = 165,000.
We have 298,000 deaths right now with just 25% of the USA population being infected (symptomatics and asymptomatics).
Your recovery percentage of 99.95% can't possibly right. It's not even close. You would not have anywhere near 298,000 deaths if the recovery rate were as high as you stated.
https://covidusa.net/ Originally Posted by adav8s28
I posted a link in the OP. You are suggesting you know more about lockdowns than Doctors from Harvard, Oxford and Stanford. Sure you do!!!!! Originally Posted by bambinoI did not argue the collateral damage from the lockdowns, other than to say that death caused by CV19 infection is irreversible as well.
I did not argue the collateral damage from the lockdowns, other than to say that death caused by CV19 infection is irreversible as well.So, you’re finally accepting “science” and agree lockdowns are more detrimental than the disease. If you’re over 70, protect yourself. But it’s really common sense. Especially with Covid not being as detrimental to younger populations. Old people don’t usually go out to drink and eat. We have had therapies and now a vaccines. Lockdowns will ruin more life’s than Covid.
This is from your link. They suggest that steps be taken to better protect high risk groups until Herd Immunity kicks in. The problem is the government is not taking any steps to better protect high risk groups.
From your link:
"Herd immunity is not a strategy but a scientifically proven phenomena, just like gravity, and you would not say that an airplane pilot is using a 'gravity strategy' to land a plane. No matter what strategy is used, we will reach herd immunity sooner or later, just as an airplane will reach the ground one way or another," Kulldorff said.
In a Newsweek op-ed published on October 30, Kulldorff, along with the other authors, said that the key to minimizing mortality is avoiding the collateral damage from lockdowns while better protecting the old and other high-risk groups. Originally Posted by adav8s28
Oh my the two biggest frauds were in parallel to defeat your God, DJT. What are the odds of that happening bambino the Greek?🤣 Originally Posted by WTF
Old people don’t usually go out to drink and eat. We have had therapies and now a vaccines. Lockdowns will ruin more life’s than Covid. Originally Posted by bambinoThe therapies before the Regeneron were not working. Regeneron works if given early. However, there is so little Regeneron available it has to be rationed. Trump, Ben Carson and Rudy G got it. The 3 thousand people who died yesterday did not get it. I don't agree with your last sentence at all. Covid will ruin more life's that partial lock downs. The government can reimburse the restaurant owner that has to close down for a short time. It's not that old people go to out to eat. The CV19 virus spreads more readily when groups of 10 or more meet and don't practice social distancing. Not enough is being done to control the spread.
You’re probably 70yrs old. Wear a mask. Stay home. Do your research. But it won’t help. You’re the most immature 70yr old in the country. Originally Posted by bambinoThis from a Jim Jones cultist who has to make fairy tales to understand how his Lord and Saviour got beaten