Good Riddance To The Orange Piece Of Shit

His hang pence narrative was a beauty

His hang pence narrative was a beauty Originally Posted by keeponrisin

When did Trump say "hang Pence"?

When did Trump say "hang Pence"? Originally Posted by Willie Wanker

I think it's more about what he didn't say...

So someone in the violence says hang pence, and trump with his magic power is suppose to instantly know this and stop it. Interesting argument.

I think it's more about what he didn't say... Originally Posted by Ed Highlight

Implicate Trump for what he didn't say, yet ignore Harris raising bail money and cheering on rioters while they're looting, murderering business owners, and burning down cities across the country.
Lol, sure.

Implicate Trump for what he didn't say, yet ignore Harris raising bail money and cheering on rioters while they're looting, murderering business owners, and burning down cities across the country.
Lol, sure. Originally Posted by Willie Wanker

willie wanker, the guy who never made a mistake, is perfect and so awesome.

The biggest difference with what your pointing out, versus what happened is.... there was only 1 person who was president at he time they incited a riot. I know Hannity likes running with all the stupid shit that they blame on democrats for BLM, thats great, keep running with it.

The second biggest point, Harris isn't president....

The Third biggest point.... lets impeach the next president for what they did before being elected into office, lets hold everything they say and do accountable, from skipping school to assaulting a random person at some random time before they were ever in politics.....

I know I can't change anyone's opinions, cause Fox News is unbiased, no spin and never misleads in their headlines.

President Trump literally had 1 job to do after being elected... Do what you said when running for president, and be the American President....

His EGO was so large, he thought he could use political rhetoric to seperate the voters from For Trump or Against Trump....

He lost most if not all D's who voted him in and also pushed away moderate R's who could see plain as day, this man was so unprofessional that they would rejoice at putting a career politician back into office.

Trump made the USA a bigger laughing stock than George W Bush, and thats a major accomplishment, I never thought I'd see the day someone would out do dimwit W, Trump took the lead and never looked back........

Trump made the USA a bigger laughing stock than Obama
, and thats a major accomplishment, I never thought I'd see the day someone would out do dimwit O Originally Posted by bf0082

Fify

The Third biggest point.... lets impeach the next president for what they did before being elected into office, lets hold everything they say and do accountable, from skipping school to assaulting a random person at some random time before they were ever in politics..... Originally Posted by bf0082

Why not? All of you "woke" Dems seem to do just that daily!

President Trump literally had 1 job to do after being elected... Do what you said when running for president, and be the American President....

His EGO was so large, he thought he could use political rhetoric to seperate the voters from For Trump or Against Trump....

He lost most if not all D's who voted him in and also pushed away moderate R's who could see plain as day, this man was so unprofessional that they would rejoice at putting a career politician back into office.

Trump made the USA a bigger laughing stock than George W Bush, and thats a major accomplishment, I never thought I'd see the day someone would out do dimwit W, Trump took the lead and never looked back........ Originally Posted by bf0082

Mr Assumption,
I've criticized Trump on mutuple occasions, even on this forum. I support most of his policies, not all. I think he screwed up by not addressing Big Tech Monopoly among other things.
Why don't you stick to expressing your own opinions instead of pretending that you know mine.

The level of office held by a politician has nothing to do with this. It's the degree of criminality.
While BLM rioters destroyed cities, Harris financially supported release of the rioters. Many continuied to commit crimes immediately upon release and were re-arrested. She also made a publicly televised statement that they should continue. That's active. participation.
Trump did attempt to diffuse what happened at the capitol, although he could have done it sooner. He never supported bailing them out or telling them to "keep it up".
As far as Trump's ego, rhetoric, blah blah blah, not a crime.

like talking to a block of wood

like talking to a block of wood Originally Posted by lilylivered

I feel ya!

Implicate Trump for what he didn't say, yet ignore Harris raising bail money and cheering on rioters while they're looting, murderering business owners, and burning down cities across the country.
Lol, sure. Originally Posted by Willie Wanker

Though i don't expect actual facts to penetrate;
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ha...otesters-bail/


I also don't expect you or anyone else in here to be able to differentiate between encouraging peaceful protesters to continue peacefully protesting to speak out against something that actually happened (an unarmed black man being killed over a counterfeit $20 bill) and lying while encouraging an armed mob to get pissed off and "take our country back" over something that didn't happen (stolen election).

On the other hand it does not mean that Harris did not give funds to others to donate so her name would not be connected.

There's too much speculation on both Trump's involvement in the Capitol riots and Harris's (and other's) involvement in bailing out rioters (and other issues) not to think that there is not some truth to each allegation. You would have to be a fool to think otherwise.

On the other hand it does not mean that Harris did not give funds to others to donate so her name would not be connected. Originally Posted by CryptKicker

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the fund itself. Or even the idea of the fund itself. If someone is in jail and bail is set at $250, but they can't afford the $250 themselves, there's nothing wrong or immoral about donating to a fund that provides them the $250.

There's too much speculation on both Trump's involvement in the Capitol riots and Harris's (and other's) involvement in bailing out rioters (and other issues) not to think that there is not some truth to each allegation. You would have to be a fool to think otherwise.

Yeah, ok. Because Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Lin Wood and Don Jr all lie to you about the election being stolen, then the "speculation" that the election was stolen is proof that there must be some truth to it.

That's how it works in Trumpistan, i suppose.