Voting is soo Hard.

Except it’s not. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

And I'm tempted to say and Joe Biden knows it isn't illegal to give someone water, it is illegal for a political partisan to give somebody something expecting a vote in return which has always been illegal. It's called tampering with voters. And anybody actually reading the bill knows it isn't, but as Biden has demonstrated on to many occasions now, he looks to the side line were his handler is for the correct answer and he gets the "narrative" answer.


The poor nitwit doesn't even know he is lying and being used by far left operatives.

its not the voting that's so hard

the voting is the easy part, other than the late night bubble in parties that can give you writers cramp


whats hard is the id part....now that can frustrate ya

Tulsi sunk her hard. Kamala's big selling point was that she was "black and underprivileged", but Tulsi pointed out that she's sent more black men and women to jail than any other AG in US history. Originally Posted by GastonGlock

I know. The Liberals have always pushed for gender equality and a Female President. Tulsi was the perfect candidate for that. The only problem with her is she can't be bought and the Media isn't fond of her.

The government that governs best is the one that governs least! Originally Posted by lustylad

So anarchy is the best form of government?

So anarchy is the best form of government? Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

No, Anarchy is the absence of Government or authority. It's absolute freedom without restraint. It wouldn't be the ideal situation in America since this country is so divided it would be constant chaos and violence. With that being said I don't think Liberals would last long under Anarchy.

So anarchy is the best form of government? Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

No, Anarchy is the absence of Government or authority. It's absolute freedom without restraint. It wouldn't be the ideal situation in America since this country is so divided it would be constant chaos and violence. With that being said I don't think Liberals would last long under Anarchy. Originally Posted by Levianon17

And anarchy is merely a transitive state. It never lasts long. People group up, make small communities, they grow, eventually some aspiring warlord unites and/or conquers an area, and you're back at square 1.

I think people are predisposed to tyranny and often in a sort of silly way, sacrifice their own liberty by supplicating to the groupthink because it gives them the ability to be tiny tyrants to others. This is why social media is rife with clout chasing and virtue signaling.

Screw her "resume". List any meaningful accomplishments as Cali AG or Senator. I'll wait.
Originally Posted by lustylad

You do that for Air head Palin and Bush43. One was govenor of a really small state in terms of population, the other a big state. Then I'll do it Harris.

What's hard about voting is not flipping the switch, or using a #2 to fill in a spot on a piece of paper, not registering to vote, nor getting to the polls, nor omg getting a mail in ballot.
What's difficult is figuring out which canidate lies less.

What's hard about voting is not flipping the switch, or using a #2 to fill in a spot on a piece of paper, not registering to vote, nor getting to the polls, nor omg getting a mail in ballot.
What's difficult is figuring out which canidate lies less. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Pro tip: You can tell if a politician is lying if they're breathing or if their heart is beating.

And anarchy is merely a transitive state. It never lasts long. People group up, make small communities, they grow, eventually some aspiring warlord unites and/or conquers an area, and you're back at square 1.

I think people are predisposed to tyranny and often in a sort of silly way, sacrifice their own liberty by supplicating to the groupthink because it gives them the ability to be tiny tyrants to others. This is why social media is rife with clout chasing and virtue signaling. Originally Posted by GastonGlock

These Liberals would be in panic without the Government there to give them false hopes, lol.

These Liberals would be in panic without the Government there to give them false hopes, lol. Originally Posted by Levianon17

the liberals would be the first target of their own constituents in the case of anarchy

^^^ right

These Liberals would be in panic without the Government there to give them false hopes, lol. Originally Posted by Levianon17

the liberals would be the first target of their own constituents in the case of anarchy Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Sounds like time for some white liberal memes!

Voting should be easy by various means. First, be a citizen of USA. Second, reside in your voting district. Third, not be disqualified by law (felon, etc. Controversial, but not relevant here). Fourth used to be not under the influence, hence the laws closing bars until polls closed, etc.

Times change. Not talking covid, since hopefully a one in hundred year event. Absentee ballots, mail in ballots have been ok for years. Suddenly suspect.

If you want security, you have to have ID that you meet criteria to vote. No problem with that personally. Problem is establishing ID. By nature, I think it has to be free and easily obtainable so as to not deter disadvantaged. So no profits for private state license bureaus unless underwritten by government. Like a state non driver ID for free. Partly solved.

But this is the internet age. If you're a doctor, try registering for e-prescribing. It can be done online, but there are required responses no one else would know but you.

Similar logic could "vet" potential voters to qualify and even vote from home.

We bank online, trade stocks online, share secrets online...why not let security gurus
figure out how to allow voting online either at poll site or remotely?