my dad never tried to teach me about how to get into a girl's pants for little effort or money.. lol Do parents really teach their kids that? Originally Posted by still-asleepLOL yea, they did. Or maybe it was just part of the Italian culture *shrug*
Actually, my whole response was in reference to the original post-which was about cheap pussy, was it not? Not sure about you southerners, but up yonder in my days of growing up-you know, back in the dinosaur era-dads taught their sons to get what they can for as little effort and/or money as possible when it came to gettin in a girl's pants. I mean, as a young guy, didn't you go after the easy lay/school slut versus the one you had to wine and dine when you wanted to get off? But ok, you are right, I am wrong. You win. Now go back to sleep.My dad never taught me anything like this. My parents taught me to respect women. I am sure the same is true of many men who see providers. Although I treat the providers I see with respect, I'm sure my parents would be greatly disappointed in me.
p.s. Sorry, the "tone" comment was not meant for "you" it was in reference to whatshisface. Originally Posted by hotlips_houlihan
but please try not to make blanket statements about our parents. Originally Posted by RoDunnYou are right. I guess I should have said "what I grew up around." So my apologies on that. But I figured when I said "my days of growing up" that was understood.
My dad never taught me anything like this. My parents taught me to respect women. I am sure the same is true of many men who see providers. Although I treat the providers I see with respect, I'm sure my parents would be greatly disappointed in me.I respect men like you. Very well said.
All I will say about the larger issue of this tread is that like many other guys, I search for high-quality experiences. Price is secondary. So I see ladies at a wide variety of price points, and have no interest in haggling them. Again, I am sure their are others just like me. We just don't post that often, especially in these types of rate threads.
If I do feel like a lady's rate isn't in line with the overall experience I'm seeking, I just don't see her.
I can imagine that it's frustrating for ladies to see threads like this, but please try not to make blanket statements about our parents. Originally Posted by RoDunn
I showed your quote where you generalized about guys learning that as we grew up. That statement had nothing to do with getting pussy for cheaper. It was just saying guys learn at an early age to try to get what they can for as little as they can. when lazarus responded to that, you changed it back to being about the specific topic from before, when your earlier statement there was clearly NOT.... unless you are trying to say that guys learn from their parents to get pussy as cheap as they can. I don't really care about what "tone" you choose to express. The sentence I quoted from you was clear enough for me. Originally Posted by still-asleepExactly. I don't see the appeal in fucking $80 pussy. I mean really? Well ladies, let this thread be a screening tool. Just saying.
hmmm.....pussy shoes.....now THAT'S a picture stuck in my mind!
Like my Uncle Lee told me many moons ago "if you could make a pair of shoes out of one you could wear them a lifetime."
Originally Posted by trynagetlaid
Really? Hot 19yo to 25yo girls with firm bodies that love the sex, but they only charge $80 to $100?
And they hide that fact from all the rest of us, but they let you in on the good deal because you're ... what? Special?
I've seen this recycled line of bullshit on this and other boards too many times to count.
It gets re-posted from time to time by the more desperate and/or unscrupulous hobbyists to (I guess) panic some of the more gullible providers into thinking they have to slash prices to get more business.
If providers really fell for this scam, it would be great for hobbyists. But the providers would just end up making less money while seeing only slightly more clients.
Some percentage of the male population is not interested in hobbying at all, primarily because they are already getting it for free from wives and girlfriends. They won't be swayed by price, because they just aren't interested, period.
Among the percentage of men that are hobbyists, the major limiting factor for all sessions is not price, but the ability of hobbyists to get away from work and/or the family to see a provider. And in this economy, hobbyists are working harder than ever to avoid getting laid off, to supplement their reduced salaries, etc. In other words, employed hobbyists have even less time to play around than before.
If providers cut their prices in half, that does not mean that hobbyists would suddenly have twice as much free time to sneak out and see the providers, does it?
And unemployed hobbyists don't have any money to spend on the hobby, period.
Hobby money is discretionary spending money, just like spending on basketball tickets, movies, beer. And when times are hard, discretionary spending is the first thing that gets trimmed, both for the employed, the under-employed and the unemployed.
So, in your fantasy scenario, a hot-but-gullible provider cuts her rate from $300 to $100. The likely result is that each regular hobbyist that sees her once a month (i.e., $300/month) may now see her maybe 3 times in a 2 month period (i.e., $150/month) and she gets maybe one new, once-a-month bargain hunter for each regular (i.e., another $100/month). That means she is now doing 2 and a half sessions per month for $250 in place of one session for $300. That's great for the hobbyist. How does that help the provider?
I don't doubt for a second there are $80 hookers out there. But they aren't hot by any reasonable definition of that term. For $80, you get a horrid-looking meth addict that will rob you if you turn your back.
Show me the $80 escort that looks like she could be on the cover of Maxim, then we can talk.
Hell, just show me the Hooters or Twin Peaks waitress that will fuck you for $80, then we can talk.
If the ladies cut their rates to $100 per session, they will find themselves working harder for less total money. And when they complain about it, I guarantee another hobbyist will jump in and say "Well, if you just cut your rate to $40 an hour...." Originally Posted by ExNYer
The other issue you run into posting that here: the quality women that actually READ and keep up just put a black mark by your name and move on. It hurts you as a hobbyist more than it scares any of us. Originally Posted by LovingKaylaReally?
I know that the ladies are allowed to violate Board rules by posting complete real names and complete phone numbers and complete P411 identifiers in the Powder Puff areaUmmm not quite sure where that information came from but that is a false statement.
I think it is a classic case of supply and demand economics. What is something worth? Whatever someone will pay. You see new cars from $20K to over $100K because people will pay. If no one paid $100K for a car there wouldn't be any on the market. In this case if there are people willing to pay $300 then the free market system is working. For me, I have X income minus Y obligations plus Z occasionally watching over me so a $300 session probably just isn't going to happen.My vote for best post in the thread. No attacks on anybody, realistic, no unqualified generalizations, well done BB. Bravo.
Over the years I've had a few high end encounters ($$$) and to be honest most weren't that great. But, same for the low end encounters ($), quite a few left me wanting for more. But certainly not all.
So we just have to let the system work. The ladies can charge what they want and as long as guys pay it everyone wins. If they ask too much the system will let them know. Too little and time to hire a scheduler and install a revolving door. For me I have a range I can be within and that's my economics. Originally Posted by Brass Balls
While it obviously tweaked the feelings of some of the ladies, I'm disappointed to see the slamming of other providers who also have a right to set their prices, and those who see them. Originally Posted by IaintlieinYou know what, you are absolutely right. I guess I really didn't look at it from that point of view. So I offer my apologies to any ladies who fall into this pricing structure that I may have offended. WALDT and we do what fits ourselves best. Although I may not agree with certain things, I know for others it probably works well. But for the record, I was tweaked at the OP for trying to pull a fast one-not the ladies in the fast lane. So I bow down to your level of common sense and thank you for always keeping me grounded.