Fort Worth/Tarrant County - 115 arrested

If these guys were going after under age girls they deserve to be busted.

Statue of limitations is 10 years. If they want to try they can if your number is found and someone is willing to do the grunt work of getting warrants and stuff .. who knows how long the hunt will go on. Originally Posted by duncantrus

Can you please cite your source for this? Unless otherwise specified in a particular statute, it’s my understanding the SOL for felonies are generally 3 years in Texas. I read this particular bill and do not recall seeing any specific carve out for a 10 year SOL.

How does targeting johns impact sex trafficking. The argument they make is that if there is no demand there will be no supply. There would be no point in forcing girls in to prostitution if there were not men willing to pay.

Now whether that is effective in slowing sex trafficking, especially with Biden's open border is for someone other than myself to say. Originally Posted by ValenTX

There s no "open border." They are still arresting illegals we catch we just are not ignoring our laws about asylum seekers like we were under President Golden Showers. I saw this story on a local news website before linked on another hobby site. You rightwingers are the ones responsible for electing the clowns who made it a felony to solicit sex. Then you come on here complaining about Biden. Sheesh you are your own worst enemy LoL

There s no "open border." They are still arresting illegals we catch we just are not ignoring our laws about asylum seekers like we were under President Golden Showers. I saw this story on a local news website before linked on another hobby site. You rightwingers are the ones responsible for electing the clowns who made it a felony to solicit sex. Then you come on here complaining about Biden. Sheesh you are your own worst enemy LoL Originally Posted by Wristshotte

A Democrat introduced the house bill, and both house and senate bills had zero votes against, Republican or Democrat.

A Democrat introduced the house bill, and both house and senate bills had zero votes against, Republican or Democrat. Originally Posted by TinMan

Of course everyone voted for it could you imagine the political ads in the next election cycle if you voted against it? "My opponent TinMan voted no on an anti-trafficking bill. I Twitch760 will work across the isle and with law enforcement to stop trafficking. Vote Twitch760 for your local representative!"

No doubt. But the point is this isn’t a one-party issue. My understanding is that the Democratic house member was the driving force behind this bill. A Republican introduced it in the Senate.

Holy crap. I've been out of the DFW area for a few months due to work. Sounds like things are going down the toilet.

Holy crap. I've been out of the DFW area for a few months due to work. Sounds like things are going down the toilet. Originally Posted by IamBull

It’s been happening throughout the state. This isn’t the first one.

It is very naive to even imagine or think that only one political party had something to do with this. You have blind hatred that will only hurt you in life with biased opinions, guessing and gossip.

All I know is that I had a lot more money for massages before the last election.

All I know is that I had a lot more money for massages before the last election. Originally Posted by Billogoods

Same. And my paypal account wasnt threatened to be snooped on by the irs.

This was a online sting to arrest child predators. All child crimes. Most were online specific and the “sting” was with a federal agency statewide. News worthy and less said due to public perception on trafficking.

Verified: friend of a friend on the local attorney circuit. #coworker

What was it type of sting was this internet or street level. We getting all kind of comments but real info

What was it type of sting was this internet or street level. We getting all kind of comments but real info Originally Posted by portcity222003

Authorities were cagey about releasing too much information, but based on their public statements it was both online and street. Three different jurisdictions were involved (TC, FW and arlington), so it could be that they each approached it differently.

As far as any online ops, it was never revealed what sites were used, but they did indicate they focused on sites known for non-adult and other forms of sex trafficking. No way to tell if that’s true (particularly for the former) or if they consider any advertising site a potential harbor for that kind of activity.

Send the women my way