Clarence Thomas in the Hospital

sure thing, groomer. Originally Posted by texassapper

Someone needs to groom you to wipe your ass

what's worse than dying you goober? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Oh I would think being your wife if your are straight or your husband if you are gay...

Oh I would think being your wife if your are straight or your husband if you are gay... Originally Posted by WTF

if you say so goober pyle

So salty, simple question. Does it look like Clarence tried to cover up his wife’s embarrassment by ruling that the archives didn’t have to turn over documents. Considering he was the only one to rule that way while 8 other justices went the other direction. The only factor being that his wife’s texts would be made public.

Are you going to honestly argue that his ruling had nothing to do with trying to cover for his wife?

If it was one of the liberal judges covering for their spouse would you argue the same way. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

... I don't know if that's what he was doing or not.
It surely may appear to be... But doesn't his wife
get her-own opinion on things?

What's wrong with her agreeing-with someone on seeking
legal avenues to overturn the election??

#### Salty

thomas has been released from the hospital. l

thomas has been released from the hospital. l Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Hopefully Tran will recover from the disappointment.

Thomas knows what is a "woman" .... one tried to ruin his promotion.

... I don't know if that's what he was doing or not.
It surely may appear to be... But doesn't his wife
get her-own opinion on things?

What's wrong with her agreeing-with someone on seeking
legal avenues to overturn the election??

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Quit being an imbecile.

She shares a bed with one of the people Trump needed to “overturn” the election, had it gone that far.

Are you really that dense?

Mate.

Someone needs to groom you to wipe your ass Originally Posted by WTF

Look if you approve of such things, why don't you just own it, Groomer?

... I don't know if that's what he was doing or not.
It surely may appear to be... But doesn't his wife
get her-own opinion on things?

What's wrong with her agreeing-with someone on seeking
legal avenues to overturn the election??

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

So you’re ok with him making a legal decision from the Supreme Court in order to prevent repercussions for his family? That’s not corrupt to you?

Dying may not be the worst of his problems. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Thought that was a cold response...

what's worse than dying you goober? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Making a ruling in order to cover up his wife’s possibly embarrassing or illegal actions would be terrible. Not like he’ll get impeached but his long career would be tarnished for sure. Of course since he’s a conservative this would be par for the course. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

I was of the mindset that whoever holds some office in the seat of government most always have a spouse. If the office holder does his job in accords with law and such, it doesn't matter anything about the spouse. And when it came up with Clarence (I think it was WTF) I thought it one-sided to only bring up just one specific person on a narrow accusation. *I* think other spouses and their actions from present and past should be used to balance the point.

But I didn't know (someone please supply the source) that old Clarence used his position to facilitate actions for use wife, i'd like to hear about it.

Hopefully, gomers like TWK can understand the face of corruption.

We goobers can, eh? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Are you a Goober? Originally Posted by Levianon17

Ima Goober, you're a Goober, she's a Goober
Won't you be a Goober too
Be a Goober, drink the grape koolaid

Apologizes to Dr Pepper.

Thought that was a cold response...





I was of the mindset that whoever holds some office in the seat of government most always have a spouse. If the office holder does his job in accords with law and such, it doesn't matter anything about the spouse. And when it came up with Clarence (I think it was WTF) I thought it one-sided to only bring up just one specific person on a narrow accusation. *I* think other spouses and their actions from present and past should be used to balance the point.

But I didn't know (someone please supply the source) that old Clarence used his position to facilitate actions for use wife, i'd like to hear about it. Originally Posted by Precious_b

... Thank you for the responce there, Preceus.

I was gonna responde with something similar to what
you stated, and you saved me the trouble.

1blackman1 has a good point, but it's Clarence's opinion
that MATTERS - NOT his wife's... And it's HIS decision
how to vote. ... And maybe they DO share the same view.

Are we really to believe that NONE of the other Judges
in history NEVER listened to the opinion of a spouse
on any issue??

Ya know, here in America I was at least hoping that we
could trust the Supreme Justices - for Honesty and Integrity -
MORE than we can trust the corrupt FBI/DOJ lately.

#### Salty

Quit being an imbecile.

She shares a bed with one of the people Trump needed to “overturn” the election, had it gone that far.

Are you really that dense?

Mate. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

... Blimey! ... The R.I. (resident idiot) of the forum here
surely wants to lecture me on FAIRNESS?

When YOU say NOTHING of the "Russian/Collusion" LIES.
Hillary, the fake dossier, and SPYING on a sitting President.
And rigging the election by claiming Hunter's laptop was fake.

... Are YOU too dense to see the UNFAIRNESS there?

Drongo.

#### Salty

... Thank you for the responce there, Preceus.

I was gonna responde with something similar to what
you stated, and you saved me the trouble.

1blackman1 has a good point, but it's Clarence's opinion
that MATTERS - NOT his wife's... And it's HIS decision
how to vote. ... And maybe they DO share the same view.

Are we really to believe that NONE of the other Judges
in history NEVER listened to the opinion of a spouse
on any issue??

Ya know, here in America I was at least hoping that we
could trust the Supreme Justices - for Honesty and Integrity -
MORE than we can trust the corrupt FBI/DOJ lately.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Watch out, Salt lick. People be saying you're drinking the koolaid.

... Blimey! ... The R.I. (resident idiot) of the forum here
surely wants to lecture me on FAIRNESS?

When YOU say NOTHING of the "Russian/Collusion" LIES.
Hillary, the fake dossier, and SPYING on a sitting President.
And rigging the election by claiming Hunter's laptop was fake.

... Are YOU too dense to see the UNFAIRNESS there?

Drongo.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

You conveniently keep ignoring the fact that he was a lone dissent on having Trumps papers turned over by the archives. Partially for what appears to be to keep his wife from being embarrassed by her communications being exposed.

Does he really believe from a legal grounds that the ex president’s papers should not be released from the archives when even Alito believes from a legal standpoint otherwise. Or is his legal decision not based in law at all, but is for personal reasons.

Wouldn’t that be corrupt? Were he a liberal in a similar circumstance wouldn’t you be musing about investigations? Be honest.