He tried to preserve it. Whatever you read was written by a delusional woke dipshit. Originally Posted by Levianon17You just admitted you never read any of the facts.
You have an agenda and a closed mind. Typical Trumpite. Good luck to you.
Can you believe this guy is in his 60s.....and this is what he comes up with ?
"Who would fardels bear, to grunt and sweat under a weary life..." Originally Posted by VitaMan
You still don't get it
TWK has the answer you are seeking Originally Posted by VitaMan
Oh I've read the facts. The problem is you never post any. Originally Posted by Levianon17Here you go bozo. Not too hard to search. You just don't want to. It's the tip of the iceberg.
Here you go bozo. Not too hard to search. You just don't want to. It's the tip of the iceberg.I am sorry to inform you, but you're chasing a Ghost. Trump won't be indicted or convicted on the basis of this.
Note: more than 60 Trump court cases dismissed.
Federal judge: Trump and lawyer John Eastman likely committed crimes in attempt to overturn election
David Knowles
Summary
In this article:
A federal judge ruled Monday that then-President Donald Trump and lawyer John Eastman "more likely than not" committed crimes in their efforts to obstruct the certification of Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 election.
The extraordinary ruling by U.S. District Court Judge David Carter ordered Eastman to turn over 101 emails to the House's Jan. 6 select committee. Eastman, who had argued that the emails were protected by attorney-client privilege, formulated a legal strategy to keep Trump in office and pressured then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject the Electoral College count showing Trump had lost to Biden.
In a blistering 44-page ruling, Carter laid out a meticulous timeline of Trump's efforts to convince elected officials and the public of his bogus claim that his loss to Biden was attributable to election fraud. The ruling, which can be appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court, will no doubt raise expectations on Attorney General Merrick Garland to launch a Justice Department investigation of the former president that could result in criminal charges.
"President Trump and Dr. Eastman justified the plan with allegations of election fraud — but President Trump likely knew the justification was baseless, and therefore that the entire plan was unlawful," Carter wrote.
Carter was especially critical of the legal justification used by Trump and Eastman to challenge the 2020 election results, and noted the mountain of evidence that showed the election had not been marred by fraud that had any bearing on the outcome.
"In the months following the election, numerous credible sources — from the President’s inner circle to agency leadership to statisticians — informed President Trump and Dr. Eastman that there was no evidence of election fraud," Carter wrote, adding, "An internal Trump Campaign memo concluded in November that fraud claims related to Dominion voting machines were baseless."
Carter continued: "In early December, Attorney General [William] Barr publicly stated there was no evidence of fraud, and on December 27, Deputy Attorney General [Richard] Donoghue privately told President Trump that after 'dozens of investigations, hundreds of interviews,' the Department of Justice had concluded that 'the major allegations [of election fraud] are not supported by the evidence developed.' Still, President Trump repeatedly urged that 'the Department [of Justice] should publicly say that the election is corrupt or suspect or not reliable.' By early January, more than sixty court cases alleging fraud had been dismissed for lack of evidence or lack of standing."
The Jan. 6 select committee, which is investigating the riot at the U.S. Capitol that was carried out in an attempt to disrupt the certification of Biden's win over Trump, had sought the emails Eastman had sent laying out the plan he and Trump knew to be illegal, Carter said.
"Based on the evidence, the Court finds that it is more likely than not that President Trump and Dr. Eastman dishonestly conspired to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021," the judge wrote.
Trump and Eastman, a former clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, have fought to keep their records from being turned over to the Jan. 6 panel. In January, however, the Supreme Court rejected arguments made by Trump's lawyers that the National Archives could withhold hundreds of pages of documents from the committee. Originally Posted by VitaMan
I am sorry to inform you, but you're chasing a Ghost. Trump won't be indicted or convicted on the basis of this. Originally Posted by Levianon17You are such a bozo. It doesn't matter if Trump is convicted of a felony or not. What matters is what you wrote and your state of mind. The last thing Trump did was try and preserve our democracy. And a judge is a delusional woke dipshit ?