Maricopa County Election Judge Speaks Out

eyecu2's Avatar
Votes have to be validated and signatures matched. This silly assertion of mass fraud would mean that ppl know all your details and how to sign your name. Or complicity of buying votes, yet nobody has been taped doing that, and the only one I ever heard of was in California....they were caught. So are these new harvesting felons just really good at hiding and signing or do they intercept the ballots and cross out R and then write in D?

Do they also know who is on the naught and nice list too?
Jacuzzme's Avatar
Why do you keep insisting that it’s fraudulent? Nobody, at least not me, is claiming the way they’re running elections isn’t legal. Retarded? Yes, but at this point not illegal. It should be, because it’s nothing more than elections by street thuggery, but isn’t.

IMO it should be far ~more~ difficult to vote. A civics test, IQ screening, and minimum 35 years old would be a good start. Unfortunately that’ll never happen and we’re stuck with representatives who are, and are elected by, morons. Fetterman is a perfect example, you’ve gotta be as brain dead as the retarded ape himself to have actually given him your vote. Not that Oz was much better, but at least he’s coherent.
eyecu2's Avatar
Why do you keep insisting that it’s fraudulent? Nobody, at least not me, is claiming the way they’re running elections isn’t legal. Retarded? Yes, but at this point not illegal. It should be, because it’s nothing more than elections by street thuggery, but isn’t.


If it's not illegal, then it should be either a state election board issue and solved at the state level. But the folks on the board claim that this is all kinds of illegal, so not pointing this towards you, but those who post that it is.


IMO it should be far ~more~ difficult to vote. A civics test, IQ screening, and minimum 35 years old would be a good start.

Limiting voters by x or y is a terrible idea and while you may agree with the idea, what if someone said we can't let z vote either, and that included you.

Where does voter discrimination stop?


Fetterman is a perfect example, you’ve gotta be as brain dead as the retarded ape himself to have actually given him your vote. Not that Oz was much better, but at least he’s coherent. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
I thought from the get-go that the Fetterman vote was really a "No" vote for Trump. Plus the guy carpetbagged his way in. Fetterman is likely a straw man who will be replaced when he can't do the job. IMHO.
berryberry's Avatar
Votes have to be validated and signatures matched. This silly assertion of mass fraud would mean that ppl know all your details and how to sign your name. Originally Posted by eyecu2
That is bullshit and you know it. There is a thread where a reporter in Nevada proved signature matching is a farce. It simply doesn't work.

And it is quite easy to commit this fraud when mass ballots are sent out to everyone, voter rolls are not updated, etc. So some residences receive half a dozen ballots or more for all the people who lived there in the past.

Add in apartment buildings where the situation with mass ballots just laying around is even worse due to the transient nature of tenants. In one county in Nevada, over 92,000 ballots sent out were undeliverable. Want to wager how many more were sent in illegally by unscrupulous people who they didn't belong to? Many, many more than the margin of victory.

And that is just the blatant fraud aspect with mail in ballots. It doesn't even touch upon the farce upon democracy that is ballot harvesting which some states ridiculously allow (and others don't prosecute when it occurs).

Since I have no doubt you will ignore these facts yet again, I will leave you with this and ask again - are you an election fraud denier? A ballot harvester denier? Both?

berryberry's Avatar
The election in Maricopa County was irreparably flawed.

They DISENFRANCHISED Maricopa voters on Election Day.

After machines malfunctioned, voters went to different locations but they couldn't vote, as they were checked in at first location.

Democrats, including Mark Kelly opposed a modest request to extend voting by few hours to accommodate those turned away.

Go ahead, tell me the left's bullshit about how they care about voter rights and do not try to suppress the vote. Democrats could've allowed these voters to vote, by simply agreeing to a modest request to keep affected polling locations open for a few hours. Mark Kelly and Democrats opposed the court request.

Now many voters in Maricopa who due to the malfunctioning machines and mysterious Drawer 3 where ballots went to die, wanted to check on the status of their ballot before their deadline to "cure" their ballots have received an email from the corrupt election officials working for Katie Hobbs. The email states that "At this time, we cannot provide individual ballot status updates for those voters who voted on election day"

So first they break 30% of the machines, making people wait over 2 hours or become frustrated and leave. Then for those who waited the 2+ hours, and the machines didn't work even after putting their ballot thru multiple times or they want to verify that what they put in "Drawer 3" was actually counted - they tell them tough shit - we can't tell you if your vote was actually counted until after we certify the election which is AFTER the deadline to "cure" their ballots

What a fucking crock of shit. And anyone who doesn't think so is an idiot who supports cheating
IMO it should be far ~more~ difficult to vote. A civics test, IQ screening, and minimum 35 years old would be a good start. Unfortunately that’ll never happen and we’re stuck with representatives who are, and are elected by, morons. Fetterman is a perfect example, you’ve gotta be as brain dead as the retarded ape himself to have actually given him your vote. Not that Oz was much better, but at least he’s coherent. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
I've been calling for this for years. Problem is, Republicans would never win another election. The trump presidency certainly would have never happened either. Now that I think about it, that's not really a problem lol.
berryberry's Avatar
Next time a Democrat screams "Voter Suppression!" just point out to them that a Democrat appointed judge refused to keep the polls open a few more hours in Maricopa County after 20%+ of polling places experienced severe malfunctions that disenfranchised thousands of conservative voters.
Lol. Time waits for no one. Not even MAGA
Jacuzzme's Avatar
Lol. Time waits for no one. Not even MAGA Originally Posted by tommy156
I’d consider fucking people out of voting cheating. Where’s Stacy Abrams when you need her? She’s usually jumping up and down (hopefully on reinforced concrete) about voter suppression.
berryberry's Avatar
Lol. Time waits for no one. Not even MAGA Originally Posted by tommy156
Democrats = Jim Crow 2.0

Disenfranchising voters and engaging in voter suppression in Maricopa County.

Add to that Maricopa County is a mess of partisanship vote counters. They adjust the number of ballots they say are left everyday. It’s immoral. But this is what happens when Katie Hobbs team is fully in charge of her own election.
eyecu2's Avatar
Next time a Democrat screams "Voter Suppression!" just point out to them that a Democrat appointed judge refused to keep the polls open a few more hours in Maricopa County after 20%+ of polling places experienced severe malfunctions that disenfranchised thousands of conservative voters. Originally Posted by berryberry

I do agree they should have kept polls open. Fair is fair, & I'm all about letting all legal votes be cast and counted.
berryberry's Avatar
I do agree they should have kept polls open. Fair is fair, & I'm all about letting all legal votes be cast and counted. Originally Posted by eyecu2
Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging that. The problems with election day machines were widespread in Maricopa County, resulting in over 2 hour lines - and it definitely suppressed the vote

In an election as close as the Arizona ones were, it very likely made a difference in the outcome in some races. It is unfathomable that the Democrats worked to block the polls from staying open 2 more hours due to the election day issues
berryberry's Avatar
The Maricopa fraud continues

Woman poll watcher testifies to Maricopa County Board of Supervisors yesterday about how 200 extra ballots unexplainably ended up in circulation

That is at the end of the day they had 200 more ballots than voters. This is one location

https://twitter.com/i/status/1593273664656523264
Jacuzzme's Avatar
I’ve said it before, maybe in this thread, if the laws don’t change Republicans need to start playing the down and dirty game that dems have done over the last 2 election cycles or start writing their obituaries. It’ll be more difficult, because red voters usually aren’t ganged together in tenements and dormitories, so they better start gathering employees to go door to door in the suburbs soon.
berryberry's Avatar
I’ve said it before, maybe in this thread, if the laws don’t change Republicans need to start playing the down and dirty game that dems have done over the last 2 election cycles or start writing their obituaries. It’ll be more difficult, because red voters usually aren’t ganged together in tenements and dormitories, so they better start gathering employees to go door to door in the suburbs soon. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
I don't disagree with you - and I will start a new thread on that topic so we keep this one focused on Maricopa County and the fraud that has taken place there.

So today, a Democrat heavy county in AZ extends the “BALLOT CURING DEADLINE”. This after voting hours couldn’t be extended after massive voter suppression caused by Maricopa County on Election Day. Unreal.

There are two sets of rules for voting out in Arizona - one for libs who the corrupt criminals running the election bend every rule to help, and another for conservatives who the corrupt criminals running the election actively work to suppress their votes.