Antiquated ideology from a different existence. For me there are still a few leftover concepts we cling to that have also long went past their 'best if used by' date and the electoral college is one of those for sure.
I think by the 2032 Presidential election the process of going to a polling station will be as common as using a cassette tape is today. But so long as we do ballots on paper in person I oppose passive voter registration. The more I think about it the less it makes sense. Today
- DNinja69
- 09-25-2023, 05:41 PM
- eyecu2
- 09-26-2023, 02:27 PM
I’m with the founders, less the racial component. Men who own property can vote, everyone else gtfo. Originally Posted by Jacuzzmewell, in the past that would be called being "rascist"- today it's simply an outdated thought. Who are you to determine the quality of a voter, vs the Bill of Rights, and those pesky 14th, 15th, 19th, 23th, 24th amendments??
When you decide that a property owners rights, especially to voting abilities- are worth more, why is that?
Do their rights seem to be HiGHER than any common born or natural citizens who are of age?
I know that there are some model of economics that suggest that, but the reality is that our democracy is based on one person- one vote. Not one landowner, one vote.