I guess the first question is WOULD the Feds act as agents provocateur? The answer to that is unequivocally, yes. In the Whitmer kidnaping plot 36% of the indicted were Federal resources.
Originally Posted by texassapper
I don't believe that's a good example. There were FBI informants and agents involved in that, but were ANY of them actually indicted for their part in the Whitmer kidnapping? Are you referring to people who ratted on their buddies so they'd get a lighter sentence?
And if you know your history, the Ruby Ridge Fiasco and Waco massacre was similarly instigated by the ATF/FBI. So is it reasonable to assume that the Feds had some hand in directing or participating in J6? Absolutely.
Originally Posted by texassapper
That's just cops being cops. A friend of mine was convicted on bogus charges because the sheriff had a personal vendetta against him and wanted to take away his guns. So they drummed something up and while he never went to jail, he can't get a decent job or travel.
There were no Feds
on the inside that pushed Waco and Ruby Ridge along. Yes the Feds did have a plant at Waco, but he never encouraged Koresh to do what he did.
Paraphrasing what McCain said, does this theory make sense? No it does not. Why would the deep state threaten its very existence and the lives of its enablers on Capitol hill, just in order to put some Proud Boys, Oathkeepers, and nameless Republican demonstrators in jail?
Lets talk about the J6 pipe bombs for a moment. The Feds released video of the person planting the bombs USING THEIR CELL PHONE! Most J6's were out of towners and were traced via cell records... but they can't find this particular person? LOL... I mean a kitchen timer w/ a one hour duration is going to trigger a pipe bomb 17 hours later? The FBI obviously thinks you are stupid..... The secret Service even swept the DNC location and didn't find the pipe bomb there...lol.
Originally Posted by texassapper
Again, does this make sense? Why would the Deep State attack the Deep State? This was the work of one or more anarchists, not federal agents.
Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund requested the National Guard be placed on standby to support his forces 6 times prior to and during the day of J6. His direct boss, Nancy Pelosi denied those requests or outright ignored his calls. Do watch the whole interview as it is very enlightening.
Originally Posted by texassapper
It wasn't Pelosi, it was security officials in the House and Senate, who were senior to the Capitol police Chief and Senate Sergeant at Arms, who wanted the Guard on standby. And the Army wouldn't have granted the request anyway based on what happened on January 6. Please see reply to Dilbert and NPR link above.
Pelosi, AOC and some other Democrats rightly or wrongly (I think wrongly) believed they were at risk of getting killed on January 6. Again, does it make sense for Pelosi to damp down security so she could place her life in danger (at least in her view)? I don't think so.
Anyway, there is enough questionable activity from the days events and the follow up to appear to be a cover up that I could spend days pulling up articles about why it's reasonable to believe that the Feds either provoked, or participated in J6 to focus the publics attention off the election irregularities.
Originally Posted by texassapper;1063355771Perhaps the best reporting being done on J6 is on revolver.news. Is it logical to assume that the Feds had NO agents on the ground on J6? By their own accounts, they lost track of how many they had... The whole Ray Epps tale is interesting... the Feds are putting people in jail that never even entered the Capitol but Ray Epps... meh after realizing how stupid they look they finally charged him... with disorderly conduct. LOL
The whole Epps fantasy was cooked up by Revolver and Tucker Carlson to sell advertisements. It's ridiculous. But we've already beat that horse to death several times. See for example ICU's thread,
https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2943692
Just because a majority of people believe the official narrative doesn't make it so...
Now there is going to be more footage coming out that Politicians didn't want you to see... why not? You paid for it... what are you going to discover that they didn't want you to know?
Maybe you think none of this sounds reasonable because you still trust your government? You don't think they have the resources to pull it off? Or you think people would keep their mouths shut? heh... Tell it to Seth Rich. Did the DNC ever turn over those servers to the FBI fr analysis?
Seriously why WOULD you believe the governments version of events?
Originally Posted by texassapper
I don't trust the government, and I don't trust Swamp Creature Donald Trump.
Julian Assange pointed the finger at Seth Rich to throw people off of the his true source for the leaks, Russian hackers. Rich was walking around late at night in Washington, D.C. and got axed by somebody trying to rob him.