Trump net keeps catching U.S. Citizens

More against deporting citizens than separating families

We can't even call it "deporting" when they are U.S. citizens. More like kidnapping and human trafficking.

The trump administration is now engaged in criminal human trafficking.

Attorneys for the families have indicated that the Trump administration account of what happened to those citizens is false and that it wasn't a choice

And in other new NY Mag is catching up to what I've been saying

Interesting
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immig...ion-crackdown/

Don't see much outrage from the folks who claim to want to protect women and U.S. citizens. These folks had their rights trampled on and were terrorized by ICE for no goof reason.

https://kfor.com/news/local/were-cit...rent-suspects/

Don't see much outrage from the folks who claim to want to protect women and U.S. citizens. These folks had their rights trampled on and were terrorized by ICE for no goof reason.

https://kfor.com/news/local/were-cit...rent-suspects/ Originally Posted by HDGristle

You won't see any outrage. It's a cult, and dear leader can do whatever the hell he wants to do - even to them. trump could deport his own voters and many would gladly TOFTT. It's a mental illness.

Oof

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ed-ice-real-id

Oof

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ed-ice-real-id Originally Posted by HDGristle

ICE is now a criminal trafficking organization

Oof

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ed-ice-real-id Originally Posted by HDGristle

ICE is now a criminal trafficking organization Originally Posted by tommy156

amusing. there's always a catch to these "deportation" claims.


Leonardo Garcia Venegas, 25, was at his construction job in Foley, Alabama, when officials arrived to arrest workers there. Garcia Venegas – who was born in Florida to Mexican parents – began filming the arrests with his mobile phone before officials reportedly knocked the device out of his hand and tried to arrest him as well.

he was detained. if he hadn't began filming do you think this would have happened?

breadcrumbs my dude ... breadcrumbs

OOF!

Many more better things will happen eventually BECAUSE he was filming

Correct, Tommy. He had a right to film, and the right ID. Because of that we know what happened and how they violated his rights

Many more better things will happen eventually BECAUSE he was filming Originally Posted by tommy156

Correct, Tommy. He had a right to film, and the right ID. Because of that we know what happened and how they violated his rights Originally Posted by HDGristle

wrong. there is no absolute right to film police arrests.



Limitations on Filming the Police

There may be certain limitations to a person’s ability to video record a police officer, even if it is legal to do so in their state. These limitations can include the following:

1. Interference with an officer’s duties: Recording a police officer may be restricted if it interferes with their ability to perform their duties. For example, suppose a person’s recording prevents an officer from communicating with others, following through on an arrest, or maintaining safety. In that case, the person may be asked to stop recording or to move to a different location.
2. Privacy concerns: Recording a police officer in certain situations, such as inside a private residence, may be restricted if it violates the privacy of others.
3. Sensitive locations: Recording may be restricted in certain sensitive locations, such as courtrooms, schools, or hospitals, to protect the rights of others and maintain order.
4. Equipment restrictions: Some states or municipalities may have laws or policies restricting the use of certain equipment when recording police officers, such as drones or night vision goggles.
5. Harassment: Recording a police officer in a way that constitutes harassment or intimidation may be illegal.

Laws and regulations regarding filming police officers can vary from state to state and even by municipalities. Hence, it is best to consult with local authorities or a lawyer to know the specific laws that apply in your area.




any one of the above will do.

Alabama... do your homework. No one said absolute right, but I do love me a strawman.

Alabama... do your homework. No one said absolute right, but I do love me a strawman. Originally Posted by HDGristle

of course you do. everyone who doesn't agree with you is a straw-man argument to you.


you've already lost. there is no absolute right Alabama included. now that we know that, what exactly is the issue here?



nothing burger

Doesn't need to be an absolute right. He wasn't charged with a filming violation AND they "couldn't" use his RealID to verify him. The right to film wasn't the issue to begin with, hence another Waco strawman falls.

You say nothingburger, I say ICE Gelato Gestapo