For once, I am willing to JUST WAIT. This won't take long. And then this thread will die from the boredom of the outcome.It already did……
. Originally Posted by rooster
elg…..
- elghund
- 02-06-2026, 01:14 AM
elg…..
- royamcr
- 02-06-2026, 01:29 AM
Remember which party voted to cut funding.
Embassy Security (2011–2012): Prior to the 2012 attack, House Republicans, including Reps. Darrell Issa and Jason Chaffetz, voted for embassy security funding that was $459 million lower than the Obama administration's request.
Sure this happened under Clinton's time as Sec State, but she doesn't control the purse. Half a billion sure would have gone a long way to secure the embassies and prevent what happened.
Embassy Security (2011–2012): Prior to the 2012 attack, House Republicans, including Reps. Darrell Issa and Jason Chaffetz, voted for embassy security funding that was $459 million lower than the Obama administration's request.
Sure this happened under Clinton's time as Sec State, but she doesn't control the purse. Half a billion sure would have gone a long way to secure the embassies and prevent what happened.
Well, Crikey, mate... I don't feel yer statement is all THAT idiotic.
We've all seen over the years how Hillary is... Though you DID
mention Benghazi - what difference does it make NOW?? ...
... 'Course IF you don't fancy the thread topic, you need not post.
... And lemme clear something up - this sitting with The Clintons
is NOT a Hearing... Just depositions - UNDER OATH...
They've NOT been accused of any crime.. ... ... Yet. ...
##### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
- elghund
- 02-06-2026, 05:57 AM
Remember which party voted to cut funding.Facts always get in the way of any good MAGAtard theories.
Embassy Security (2011–2012): Prior to the 2012 attack, House Republicans, including Reps. Darrell Issa and Jason Chaffetz, voted for embassy security funding that was $459 million lower than the Obama administration's request.
Sure this happened under Clinton's time as Sec State, but she doesn't control the purse. Half a billion sure would have gone a long way to secure the embassies and prevent what happened. Originally Posted by royamcr
elg…..
- Yssup Rider
- 02-06-2026, 08:29 AM
There are no good MAGA theories. They are fantasies in the minds of those who worship a lunatic.
- RX792P
- 02-06-2026, 08:43 AM
Will Comer agree to public hearing?
If not...why not...does he feel the Committee needs to 'massage' the info before releasing it to the public?
I would agree with Hillary that's the most transparent.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton challenged Republicans on the House Oversight Committee to take her testimony and that of former President Bill Clinton about sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in public, and not in a closed session as those lawmakers plan.
“So let’s stop the games. If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s have it — in public,” Clinton wrote, naming the panel’s chairman.
“You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on.”
If not...why not...does he feel the Committee needs to 'massage' the info before releasing it to the public?
I would agree with Hillary that's the most transparent.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton challenged Republicans on the House Oversight Committee to take her testimony and that of former President Bill Clinton about sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in public, and not in a closed session as those lawmakers plan.
“So let’s stop the games. If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s have it — in public,” Clinton wrote, naming the panel’s chairman.
“You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on.”
- elghund
- 02-06-2026, 10:15 AM
Will Comer agree to public hearing?Republicans are terrified about open, transparent, public hearings. They cant control the spin in advance.
If not...why not...does he feel the Committee needs to 'massage' the info before releasing it to the public?
I would agree with Hillary that's the most transparent.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton challenged Republicans on the House Oversight Committee to take her testimony and that of former President Bill Clinton about sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in public, and not in a closed session as those lawmakers plan.
“So let’s stop the games. If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s have it — in public,” Clinton wrote, naming the panel’s chairman.
“You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on.” Originally Posted by RX792P
elg…..
- Salty Again
- 02-06-2026, 03:12 PM
Well, Crikey, mate... I don't feel yer statement is all THAT idiotic.... THIS
We've all seen over the years how Hillary is... Though you DID
mention Benghazi - what difference does it make NOW?? ...
... 'Course IF you don't fancy the thread topic, you need not post.
... And lemme clear something up - this sitting with The Clintons
is NOT a Hearing... Just depositions - UNDER OATH...
They've NOT been accused of any crime.. ... ... Yet. ...
##### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
#### Salty
- Salty Again
- 02-06-2026, 03:20 PM
... Ain't it just AMAZING that Bill and Hillary DO NOW want to
come in for a chat with The Congressional Oversight Committee.
They've been stalling for months - and NOW, now that DEMOCRATS
on the Oversight Committee surely sided with the Republicans
and were about to vote the Clintons - in Contempt. ...
... See? ... The Clintons USED to have a lot o' stroke with things.
But THAT was before - NOW things are different... Not just
for Bill and Hillary, but MOST of the Democrat party.
... Blimey! ... Democrats pushing for CONTEMPT charges against
Bill and Hillary Clinton! ...
... 
... Who would
have even thought THAT was possible...
... 
... Maybe the Clintons ARE headed for Prison....
... 
#### Salty
come in for a chat with The Congressional Oversight Committee.
They've been stalling for months - and NOW, now that DEMOCRATS
on the Oversight Committee surely sided with the Republicans
and were about to vote the Clintons - in Contempt. ...
... See? ... The Clintons USED to have a lot o' stroke with things.
But THAT was before - NOW things are different... Not just
for Bill and Hillary, but MOST of the Democrat party.
... Blimey! ... Democrats pushing for CONTEMPT charges against
Bill and Hillary Clinton! ...
... ... Who wouldhave even thought THAT was possible...
... ... Maybe the Clintons ARE headed for Prison....
... #### Salty
- Yssup Rider
- 02-06-2026, 04:48 PM
- RX792P
- 02-07-2026, 06:01 AM
Public testimony will be interesting...or will Comer and Company decide otherwise?
- Salty Again
- 02-07-2026, 09:54 PM
... Won't be public testimony. ... Might be public Hearings, though
- IF the Clintons are indicted for wrong-doings and what-not.
... Won't THAT be GRAND?! ...
... ...
##### Salty
- IF the Clintons are indicted for wrong-doings and what-not.
... Won't THAT be GRAND?! ...
... ... ##### Salty
- Yssup Rider
- 02-08-2026, 09:04 AM
Who’s going to indict them, Salty? On what charge?
Pull your head out of the clouds, dude.
Pull your head out of the clouds, dude.
- Salty Again
- 02-08-2026, 04:35 PM
... They might be indicted by the FBI or DOJ, once they give
answers in their chat with The Oversight Committee.
... Perhaps the Oversight Committee already HAS Evidence
of wrong-doing. ... And just wants the Clintons to confirm it.
... This is all just theory at this point, mates.
Let's allow the Committee there to do their work...
##### Salty
answers in their chat with The Oversight Committee.
... Perhaps the Oversight Committee already HAS Evidence
of wrong-doing. ... And just wants the Clintons to confirm it.
... This is all just theory at this point, mates.
Let's allow the Committee there to do their work...
##### Salty
- rooster
- 02-09-2026, 07:10 PM
... They might be indicted by the FBI or DOJ, once they giveNot theory. Bullshit.
answers in their chat with The Oversight Committee.
... Perhaps the Oversight Committee already HAS Evidence
of wrong-doing. ... And just wants the Clintons to confirm it.
... This is all just theory at this point, mates.
Let's allow the Committee there to do their work.... Originally Posted by Salty Again
.
- Salty Again
- 02-12-2026, 09:13 PM
... Blimey! ... Me political "Insiders" have mentioned that
Hillary Clinton has left the country - maybe for a convention or
to pester Russia or China for MORE Clinton Foundation donations.
... Hmmmm... Could be that she's attending the Olympics.
That might be GRAND - surely for Bill Clinton - as Bill may be having
his-own "Olympics" ... WINNING Gold medals in the "Broad Jump"!!!
... He's surely WON them before! ... ... 
...
... But Hillary had better be back inside of a fortnight - because she
(and Bill - if he aint too tired ) surely got a date with
the House Oversight Committee on 26 and 27 February...
... Just a friendly reminder from Salty! ...
#### Salty
Hillary Clinton has left the country - maybe for a convention or
to pester Russia or China for MORE Clinton Foundation donations.
... Hmmmm... Could be that she's attending the Olympics.
That might be GRAND - surely for Bill Clinton - as Bill may be having
his-own "Olympics" ... WINNING Gold medals in the "Broad Jump"!!!
... He's surely WON them before! ...
... ... ... But Hillary had better be back inside of a fortnight - because she
(and Bill - if he aint too tired
) surely got a date withthe House Oversight Committee on 26 and 27 February...
... Just a friendly reminder from Salty! ...
#### Salty