Why Hate, Congradulate!

OK, I'm a little lost here.

An anonymous poster puts up a complete unsubstantiated story on backpage defaming MJ and Nikki. MJ and Nikki post this isn't true. I don't think I read a SINGLE questioning of the story's source, not one. We have a couple of dozen posts belittling members of community, whose reputations have been attacked by what is almost certainly a false story (if it was true, it would include some sort of citation.)

Doesn't seem all that productive if you ask me. I want to know who posted the story, let that little coward come out for this treatment. In the meantime, we have a fallacy going and MJ and Nikki are being asked to prove a negative (prove that you don't is always a difficult argument. It's like, "Oh yeah, prove you're not gay" or "Prove you're really broke" or whatever. Any defense comes off sounding like a lie or cover up.

Personally, I like to check my facts before I speak on a subject.

OK, I'm a little lost here.

An anonymous poster puts up a complete unsubstantiated story on backpage defaming MJ and Nikki. MJ and Nikki post this isn't true. I don't think I read a SINGLE questioning of the story's source, not one. We have a couple of dozen posts belittling members of community, whose reputations have been attacked by what is almost certainly a false story (if it was true, it would include some sort of citation.)

Doesn't seem all that productive if you ask me. I want to know who posted the story, let that little coward come out for this treatment. In the meantime, we have a fallacy going and MJ and Nikki are being asked to prove a negative (prove that you don't is always a difficult argument. It's like, "Oh yeah, prove you're not gay" or "Prove you're really broke" or whatever. Any defense comes off sounding like a lie or cover up.

Personally, I like to check my facts before I speak on a subject. Originally Posted by MisterSir

Where's the rest of the round table?

OK, I'm a little lost here.

An anonymous poster puts up a complete unsubstantiated story on backpage defaming MJ and Nikki. MJ and Nikki post this isn't true. I don't think I read a SINGLE questioning of the story's source, not one. We have a couple of dozen posts belittling members of community, whose reputations have been attacked by what is almost certainly a false story (if it was true, it would include some sort of citation.)

Doesn't seem all that productive if you ask me. I want to know who posted the story, let that little coward come out for this treatment. In the meantime, we have a fallacy going and MJ and Nikki are being asked to prove a negative (prove that you don't is always a difficult argument. It's like, "Oh yeah, prove you're not gay" or "Prove you're really broke" or whatever. Any defense comes off sounding like a lie or cover up.

Personally, I like to check my facts before I speak on a subject. Originally Posted by MisterSir

Actually Mr. Fact checker, no one on this thread claimed that either of these ladies have anything, in fact she brought it up, the vast majority of this thread is discussing AIDs/hiv in porn and AIDS/HIV testing with little a mention of the OP or her "bitch". So your free now to go and try and get your discount or freebie.

Actually Mr. Fact checker, no one on this thread claimed that either of these ladies have anything, in fact she brought it up, the vast majority of this thread is discussing AIDs/hiv in porn and AIDS/HIV testing with little a mention of the OP or her "bitch". So your free now to go and try and get your discount or freebie. Originally Posted by dirty dog

LOL nicely done.

For some reason, every time I see one of these threads, I start hearing the Mighty Dog theme in my head.....

Do you mean Underdog Sin?

Personally, I like to check my facts before I speak on a subject. Originally Posted by MisterSir

Looks like you forgot to check them this time...

I was thinking Mighty Mouse, "Here I Come To Save The Day."

lol or maybe Might Mouse and Underdog needed to fuse together to form Mighty Dog. It was that big of a deal!

Another fallacy, attribution.

It's an indicator of the times I guess.
Anonymous information is given without reference
Information is questioned about legtimacy
Questioner is attacked as being biased, instead of questioning of anonymous source

I'll break the cycle from devolving into a Straw Man argument about me.

You can use that same schema for people who asked "WTF is up with that whole 'Obama's a Muslim terrorist from Kenya and the antichrist too?' thing. Is that for real?" People immediately got attacked as being biased, even though the argument was clearly full of crap. You may or may not like Obama, but he's not a Muslim terrorist from Kenya and if he's the antichrist he's doing a bad job of that too.

All of which means, logically, that I'll be getting a freebie from President Obama. Thank you for your time.

Wow dude...

I'll bet the BP poster was MisterSir himself. Just so he could bide his time, let the controversy build, and then swoop in and save the day.

Was that what you were looking for in terms of speculation? Besides shouldn't you get going on that review of Sweet Polly Purebred...

I was thinking Mighty Mouse, "Here I Come To Save The Day." Originally Posted by MsElena

Dammit, lol that's what I meant. I guess I need to brush up on my cartoon theme songs!!

Heeeeere I come to save the daaaaay! Captain Saveaho is on the waaaaaay!

Hahaha

I watch too many cartoons. I'm addicted to old school cartoons.